cd /news/artificial-intelligence/fusioneval-benchmarking-model-fusion… · home › topics › artificial-intelligence › article
[ARTICLE · art-155803] src=arxiv.org ↗ pub= topic=artificial-intelligence verified=true sentiment=· neutral

FusionEval: Benchmarking Model Fusion for Large Language Models

A team of researchers released FusionEval, a benchmark (arXiv:2610.30162v1) for evaluating model fusion across controlled expert pools built from Qwen3 and Llama base models spanning math, code, science, instruction following, and tool use. FusionEval measures capability retention and computational cost on eight public benchmarks, reporting normalized average and worst performance, runtime, and peak GPU memory; experiments found training-free fusion methods preserve reasoning but substantially degrade tool use at both model scales, while MOPD preserves tool use and yields a more balanced capability profile at the cost of additional data preparation, inference, and training. The authors conclude that jointly retaining reasoning, instruction following, and tool use at low computational cost remains a challenge, and released code at github.com/Baicaihaochi/FusionEval_Benchmark.

by read1 min views4 publishedOct 23, 2026

arXiv:2610.30162v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Model fusion aims to integrate the capabilities of multi-expert models into a single model. Existing evaluations offer limited coverage of reasoning with long chains of thought and tool use, while strong average performance can mask substantial losses in individual expert capabilities. We introduce FusionEval, a benchmark that provides controlled expert pools, integrates fusion methods with and without additional training, and offers a unified evaluation suite. The pools contain domain experts independently trained from Qwen3 and Llama base models across math, code, science, instruction following, and tool use. The suite evaluates capability retention and computational cost on eight public benchmarks under comparable data access rules, reporting normalized average and worst performance, runtime, and peak GPU memory usage. Extensive experiments show that training-free methods preserve reasoning performance but substantially degrade tool use at both model scales. In contrast, MOPD preserves tool use and achieves a more balanced capability profile, but requires additional data preparation, inference, and training. Jointly retaining reasoning, instruction following, and tool use at low computational cost remains a challenge. We hope FusionEval supports future research on efficient model fusion that jointly preserves expert capabilities. Our code is available at https://github.com/Baicaihaochi/FusionEval_Benchmark.

── more in #artificial-intelligence 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @fusioneval 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
→ Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host ✓
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/fusioneval-benchmark…] indexed:0 read:1min 2026-10-23 · —