cd /news/machine-learning/a-quadratic-lens-on-muon-s-polar-upd… · home › topics › machine-learning › article
[ARTICLE · art-155786] src=arxiv.org ↗ pub= topic=machine-learning verified=true sentiment=· neutral

A Quadratic Lens on Muon's Polar Update: Benefits, Pitfalls, and the Role of Newton-Schulz

A new arXiv paper (2610.30280v1) analyzes PolarGD, the orthogonalized update at the core of Muon, on matrix quadratics and finds orthogonalization pays off only when the gradient is far from low rank and its largest singular directions see high curvature. The analysis shows PolarGD reaches the minimizer in one step whenever the rows of the error are orthogonal with equal norms, for any Hessian, while gradient descent requires all Hessian eigenvalues to be equal; over many steps PolarGD behaves as gradient descent preconditioned by the current iterate, so its speed depends on the iterate's conditioning rather than the Hessian's, explaining both fast regimes and a slow one caused by tiny singular values. The authors report that the few Newton-Schulz iterations Muon uses treat these tiny singular values as gradient descent does, so fewer iterations can converge faster than exact orthogonalization, and that in a transformer trained with Muon about a quarter of the singular values of the attention matrices fall in this regime.

by read1 min views3 publishedOct 23, 2026

arXiv:2610.30280v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Muon updates matrix-valued parameters along approximately orthogonalized directions and often trains large language models faster than AdamW, yet it remains unclear when and why orthogonalization helps. We study PolarGD, the orthogonalized update at the core of Muon, on matrix quadratics, where optimizers can be analyzed in closed form, and compare update directions under line search to remove the effect of learning-rate tuning. Orthogonalization pays off when the gradient is far from low rank and its largest singular directions see high curvature. PolarGD reaches the minimizer in one step whenever the rows of the error are orthogonal with equal norms, for any Hessian, whereas gradient descent needs all Hessian eigenvalues to be equal; and unlike sign descent, PolarGD is unaffected by rotations of the problem. Over many steps, PolarGD acts as gradient descent preconditioned by the current iterate, so its speed is governed by the conditioning of the iterate rather than of the Hessian. This explains fast regimes as well as a slow one, caused by tiny singular values of the iterate, in which PolarGD is much slower than gradient descent. Finally, the few Newton-Schulz iterations used in Muon treat these tiny singular values as gradient descent does, so fewer iterations can converge faster than exact orthogonalization; in a transformer trained with Muon, about a quarter of the singular values of the attention matrices fall in this regime.

── more in #machine-learning 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @muon 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
→ Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host ✓
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/a-quadratic-lens-on-…] indexed:0 read:1min 2026-10-23 · —