Ad Infinitum Posted 5 days ago by Matthias Ott 382 Webmentions #advertising #AI #google #privacy #search #web At Google I/O this week, the company announced the biggest change to Search in 25 years. The ten blue links? Gone. Instead, you get — first at times? soon always? — “generative UI”, an “intelligent search box” with custom interactive widgets, built on the fly by Gemini. You get “information agents” that monitor the web for you around the clock. You get mini-apps you can build right inside the search box, using natural language. And with Gemini Spark, you get a personal AI agent that runs 24/7, connected to your Gmail, your Drive, your calendar, your photos, and soon your local files and third-party services. It’s ambitious and also impressive at times, no question. It’s also a staggering gamble. Google is dismantling the very product that built its empire – and rebuilding it into something entirely different. Watching the demos, I kept asking myself two questions. First: what if people don’t actually want to use search this way? And second: Where did the ads go? Google made $295 billion in advertising revenue last year, out of $403 billion in total. And yet, across all these announcements – the new search box, the generative UI, Spark, the agents – there wasn’t a single mention of how any of this will be monetized. Not one word about ads. That seemed odd. I mentioned this on Mastodon, and Sijmen replied with a link that sent me down a rabbit hole. It turns out there’s a small but growing body of research – some of it from Google’s own researchers – exploring exactly how ads could work inside LLM-generated output. And the ideas are as fascinating as they are unsettling. One approach, proposed by Google Research, is what you might call a “token auction.” In this model, advertisers don’t buy ad slots on a page. Instead, they bid, token by token, on the actual text the model generates. Each advertiser brings their own LLM, and an auction mechanism decides whose model gets to influence the next word. The output is a weighted blend of competing interests, shaped by who’s willing to pay more. Another approach – also from Google researchers – fits the new “Search” much more precisely. It’s called “prominence allocation.” Here, when a user submits a query with commercial intent, the system runs an auction that doesn’t just decide which ads appear, but how prominently the LLM writes about each one. The auction outputs a prominence score for each advertiser, essentially telling the model: give this product 35 words, that one 20, and this one zero. The ad isn’t next to the answer. The ad is the answer. Or rather, it shapes how much space and enthusiasm each product gets within the answer. Now think about what Google just announced. Generative UI means there are no more discrete ad slots. The search result is a dynamically generated experience – a synthesized narrative, an interactive widget, a curated set of recommendations. In that world, you can’t place a banner ad next to the output. The only thing you can auction is prominence within it. But it’s not just the ads that disappeared from the keynote. The links did, too. For 25 years, Google Search was built on a contract. The web provided the content – billions of pages, freely linked, freely crawled. In return, Google sent people back. The link was the unit of exchange. It’s what made the Web thrive as an information system: you publish, Google indexes, users click through, and value flows back to the source. Win-win. That contract is now broken. Generative UI doesn’t link to your article, necessarily. It absorbs your article, synthesizes it into a widget, and presents it as Google’s own answer. Information agents don’t send users to websites. They deliver “synthesized updates” with maybe a link or two buried at the bottom. The web was the scaffolding Google needed to build its index, to train its models, to accumulate the world’s information, and put ads next to it to get filthy rich. Now that the content is inside the system, the scaffolding is no longer needed. Google is creating its own context. Google thinks it no longer needs the Web to deliver answers. And it no longer needs ad slots to deliver ads. What it needs is you. Your emails, your files, your calendar, your purchase history, your travel plans – all flowing into Spark, all building the richest possible picture of who you are and what you’re likely to click on. That’s exactly the kind of personal context those auction models need to work. The prediction module in the prominence allocation framework doesn’t run on keywords. It runs on knowing you. None of this was mentioned at I/O. The entire keynote was framed as a story about usefulness and possibility and trust. Will you opt in to sharing your data? Will you let Spark read your inbox? The pitch is productivity. But the infrastructure being built – a deeply personalized agent, connected to commercial services, generating natural-language recommendations with no visible boundary between organic and paid content – is a monetization engine. Then, one day later, Google held Marketing Live, its annual keynote for advertisers. Same campus, same week, different audience. And there, the language changed completely. Vidhya Srinivasan, VP of Google Ads, put it plainly: “The best ads must be answers.” Ads are already running inside AI Mode. They’re not banners next to the output. They’re generated by Gemini to read as part of the conversation. And advertisers who want to appear in the new AI search? They must hand over creative and targeting control to Google’s system. “You can’t choose keywords anymore,” Srinivasan said. Edit: Google’s own blog post now spells out exactly what this looks like in practice. When AI Mode gives you a list of recommendations, paid placements can now appear as items on that list. Google calls them “Highlighted Answers.” When you search for a product, Gemini writes a custom explainer for the advertiser, framed as objective advice about why this product “may be the right choice for you.” The language throughout is about being “helpful” and “building trust.” The mechanism is paid content inside AI-generated recommendations, written by the same model that’s supposed to give you neutral answers. So yes, Google didn’t talk about ads in the I/O keynote. Everything they announced is the new ad system. One that, in the eyes of Google, no longer needs the open web as an intermediary. And now, they’re gradually turning it on. But there’s still that first question. The one about whether people actually want any of this. The people building these systems seem so deep inside their own world that they sometimes forget to check. You might have heard that, over the past few days, commencement speakers across the US, including former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, have been booed off stage the moment they mentioned AI. Not just politely ignored. Booed. Google is betting its entire future on a world where people eagerly hand over their emails, their files, their habits, and their trust – to an AI system that will quietly auction off their attention, word by word, to the highest bidder. The ad infrastructure is ready. The question is whether the audience is. ~ 372 Webmentions Jonathan Schofield 20 May 2026 | 20:01 …“Google thinks it no longer needs ad slots to deliver ads. What it needs is you. Your emails, your files, your calendar, your purchase history, your travel plans – all flowing into Spark, all building the richest possible picture of who you are and what you’re likely to click on. That’s exactly the kind of personal context auction models need to work.” — ... pablolarah 21 May 2026 | 02:42 ♾️ Ad Infinitum by @matthiasott At Google I/O this week, the company announced the biggest change to Search in 25 years. #advertising #AI #google #privacy #search #web https://matthiasott.com/notes/ad-infinitum advertising ai google privacy search web Christopher Kirk-Nielsen 21 May 2026 | 03:40 @matthiasott It's mind boggling. It's like blockchain all over again, some person has the idea of "let's use it for everything" except this time it made it to some stakeholder at Google and they're killing their flagship product for… sloppy results which won't drive any traffic to the very sources they slurped up? Eesh, count me out. (well I am already not using Google Search personally, but count me out twice ... Amelia Bellamy-Royds 21 May 2026 | 06:51 @matthiasott This is an excellent write-up Matthias, following the money to find the gotcha under all the gloss. I still suspect they will eventually include conventional advertisements, but covert ads in AI answers are more concerning. Most countries have either regulations or media-industry standards requiring advertising & paid placement content to be identified. Public pressure will be needed to keep that so. ... mantish 21 May 2026 | 07:35 @matthiasott great article! "Google is betting its entire future on a world where people eagerly hand over their emails, their files, their habits, and their trust" They have such a big market share and they know people don't really make this choice consciously. Most people are unaware or don't make a big deal out of this. Rik Schennink 21 May 2026 | 08:22 If ad disclosure is a legal requirement, and ads are so intertwined with the conversation as to be unrecognizable, then would this mean that the entire conversation with Gemini should be clearly marked as an ad? Matthias Ott 21 May 2026 | 08:32 Yes, I thought about that too… Will there be little “sponsored reply” badges everywhere? Probably not. But will the whole product then marked as advertisement? I have no idea. Marcel Haas 🟥 21 May 2026 | 08:31 That could just be three words on top of the page that some users might actually catch on their first use. Within hours, perhaps days, everybody will just ignore it and use the content as if it were genuine. Rik Schennink 21 May 2026 | 08:52 I'm sure they'll put max effort into finding the perfect opacity level and font size for their disclaimer. Sylvain Wallez 21 May 2026 | 08:26 "There’s a small but growing body of research exploring exactly how ads could work inside LLM-generated output. And the ideas are as fascinating as they are unsettling". Google doesn't need the web anymore. It needs your data as context for a token bidding engine. matthiasott.com/notes/ad-inf... Marco 🇪🇺 21 May 2026 | 08:51 @matthiasott another thing is that I can‘t decide anymore to not see ads. Currently we can use content blockers to get a more peaceful and less distracting browsing experience. We are able to decide which sites we support by selectively allowing ads to be visible. This isn’t that easy anymore with the new ad mode (maybe using local ai to rewrite the results to cut out the intrusive content but might be hard ... Matthias Ott 21 May 2026 | 08:57 Oh! Listening to my favorite podcast @shoptalkshow.com reminded me that I forgot to connect the dots to another, probably totally unrelated detail: that Chrome just shipped with the Prompt API and a 4GB Gemini Nano model, despite pushback from other browser makers. matthiasott.com/notes/lazy-a... Bastian Allgeier 21 May 2026 | 09:48 Google's plans from this year's I/O are beyond dystopian. @matthiasott is doing a great job to summarize it all: https://matthiasott.com/notes/ad-infinitum Ad Infinitum · Matthias Ott Caspar Fairhall 21 May 2026 | 10:36 @matthiasott Unsettling, indeed. Terrifying might be an even more apt adjective. Pier #0 21 May 2026 | 11:22 @matthiasott spiega l'ultima scommessa di Google: nell'era dell'AI, la pubblicità diventa invisibile perché diventa il contenuto stesso. https://matthiasott.com/notes/ad-infinitum Ad Infinitum · Matthias Ott Jon Henshaw 21 May 2026 | 13:29 @matthiasott Ahhh, here they are! https://blog.google/products/ads-commerce/google-marketing-live-search-ads/ A new generation of ads for the AI era of Search Ryan Sutter 21 May 2026 | 14:42 How far they have strayed from "don't be evil". KanaMauna 21 May 2026 | 19:10 @matthiasott I am assuming that the ads will include paid political advertisements. Doesn’t this get pretty close to political subliminal messaging propaganda? Andrew Wippler 21 May 2026 | 20:32 @matthiasott Google took the traffic that would cost you bandwidth and decided to pay for it themselves. They will go bankrupt by hogging all the traffic. Down in a blaze of glory. Simplicator 21 May 2026 | 23:19 @matthiasott #Google = #PlatosWindowlessCell google platoswindowlesscell Reilly Spitzfaden (they/them) 22 May 2026 | 01:34 > So yes, Google didn’t talk about ads in the I/O keynote. Everything they announced is the new ad system. One that, in the eyes of Google, no longer needs the open web as an intermediary. And now, they’re gradually turning it on. matthiasott.com/notes/ad-inf... Reilly Spitzfaden (they/them) 22 May 2026 | 01:36 > The language throughout is about being “helpful” and “building trust.” The mechanism is paid content inside AI-generated recommendations, written by the same model that’s supposed to give you neutral answers. Reilly Spitzfaden (they/them) 22 May 2026 | 01:37 > “One approach, proposed by Google Research, is what you might call a “token auction”… Each advertiser brings their own LLM, and an auction mechanism decides whose model gets to influence the next word. The output is a weighted blend of competing interests, shaped by who’s willing to pay more.” Reilly Spitzfaden (they/them) 22 May 2026 | 01:40 If you're as disturbed as I am by Google's pivot to AI in their search, here are a few alternatives: - startpage.com — privacy-preserving, pulls results from Google/Bing's databases. - SearXNG: software anyone can host to pull from many search engines. List of hosted URLs here: searx.space Reilly Spitzfaden (they/them) 22 May 2026 | 01:42 For both Startpage and SearXNG, you can right-click in the Firefox URL bar and there should be an option to add it as a search engine. For the list of SearXNG URLs above, I usually type my country into the “country” box to get one located nearby (for speed reasons). troy_friz_zell 22 May 2026 | 02:41 @matthiasott Motherfuckers are high on their own supply. When I search the web, I don't want a story from a spicy autocomplete. I am trying to find a link to an actual expert. This is exactly the opposite of what I want. I will never use it. That said, good. I hope this brings their entire evil empire crashing to the ground. Tim Severien 22 May 2026 | 05:32 @matthiasott I expect these ad-sprinkled LLM outputs will be really bad for users if they're not clearly presented as ads due to the automation bias. I also wonder how Google plans to combat misinformation and such. Surely some political movements and lobbying industries are happy to spend a big ol' bag o' money to nudge answes to their favour. Pretty sure that there's a financial asymmetry between fossil fuel ... Kevin 22 May 2026 | 05:50 @ambientspace G00gley eyes' ads suck. They are very random and irrelevant for me even though I allow them to track me from site to site. Kevin 22 May 2026 | 05:54 @codecapitano @matthiasott I allow all ads but the problem is the ads are overlapping each other since there are so many. I cannot count the number of ads I see on a webpage because they blink so fast and reload over and over. It is very comical. XD Matej Lexa 22 May 2026 | 08:43 But where are the ads!? Interesting observations from @matthiasott. Especially the two possible models of combining LLMs and ads - go to the blog post to read about them. Meanwhile some excerpts: --- At Google I/O this week, the company announced the biggest change to Search in 25 years. The ten blue links? Gone. Instead, you get “generative UI” – custom interactive widgets, built on the fly by Gemini. You ... Sara Soueidan 22 May 2026 | 11:33 "For 25 years, Google Search was built on a contract. The web provided the content – billions of pages, freely linked, freely crawled. In return, Google sent people back. The link was the unit of exchange. [...] That contract is now broken. Generative UI doesn’t link to your article. It absorbs your article, synthesizes it into a widget, and presents it as Google’s own answer. Information agents don’t ... Bruce Lawson ✅ ♫ ♿ ✌️♂️✊ 22 May 2026 | 11:37 Read this. "Google didn’t talk about ads in the I/O keynote. Everything they announced is the new ad system. One that, in the eyes of Google, no longer needs the open web as an intermediary … Google is betting its entire future on a world where people eagerly hand over their emails, their files, their habits, and their trust – to an AI system that will quietly auction off their attention, word by word, to ... Hidde 22 May 2026 | 11:49 🔗 “Google didn’t talk about ads in the I/O keynote. Everything they announced is the new ad system. One that, in the eyes of Google, no longer needs the open web as an intermediary. And now, they’re gradually turning it on.” — @matthiasott https://matthiasott.com/notes/ad-infinitum Ad Infinitum · Matthias Ott Jeffrey Yasskin 22 May 2026 | 16:27 @hdv @matthiasott So, I'm as horrified as anyone by the prospect of advertisers buying influence over the main search results, and I've already switched to kagi.com over the general AI slop in Google results, but the article misleadingly omits that the actual Google demos still say "Sponsored" over all the advertise-controlled content. Wes Fenlon 22 May 2026 | 16:27 Wow, Google figured it out. They actually figured out how to build Hell and make us live in it matthiasott.com/notes/ad-inf... homembarata.bsky.social 22 May 2026 | 18:16 We used to search things and find exactly what we wanted on the internet, back in my days chunderthicken 22 May 2026 | 17:46 I’m getting accustomed to disappointment Shoalfield 22 May 2026 | 17:01 It is genuinely difficult to describe both how revolutionary google search was as a tool for information handling, and how fucking steep its decline has been. Viviana 22 May 2026 | 16:51 @matthiasott Reading your post I have to think about "The Circle" and shudder ... AutoModerator 22 May 2026 | 16:53 Friendly reminder: if you're looking for a Google service or Google product alternative then feel free to check out our sidebar. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. Azar42 22 May 2026 | 16:54 I found this bit of this article chilling: Another approach – also from Google researchers – fits the new “Search” much more precisely. It’s called “prominence allocation.” Here, when a user submits a query with commercial intent, the system runs an auction that doesn’t just decide which ads appear, but how prominently the LLM writes about each one. The auction outputs a prominence score for each ... lessadessa 22 May 2026 | 22:13 google is an advertising company now. Member9999 23 May 2026 | 05:09 Ewww. Grumpfeljens 23 May 2026 | 14:20 War eine schöne Zeit mit #webseiten . Aber alles Gute findet mal sein Ende. 😬 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xpk7soxvOMY Mit Infos von @matthiasott https://matthiasott.com/notes/ad-infinitum webseiten Google might have just killed websites Trooper_Tales 24 May 2026 | 17:44 This is going to be the misinformation of the century when applied to so many chrome and google search users. Frontend Dogma 24 May 2026 | 22:20 Ad Infinitum, by @matthiasott: https://matthiasott.com/notes/ad-infinitum?ref=frontenddogma.com #google #search #ai #economics ai economics google search Ad Infinitum · Matthias Ott Stefan Grund :eay: 24 May 2026 | 23:49 Ad Infinitum / Zu Googles angekündigter AI-Suche → https://matthiasott.com/notes/ad-infinitum @matthiasott fast zusammen, was Google eigentlich auf seiner AI-durchtränkten I/O-Keynote – hier der 54 Sekunden lange AI-Supercut – angekündigt, aber nicht explizit gesagt hat: Nämlich dass sie ihre bisherigen Quellen – das Open Web – und das eigene Geschäftsmodell – die Werbelinks in den ... Dominik Lasthaus 25 May 2026 | 10:20 Ein Grund mehr für Kagi. 🤗 161 Reposts Beto Dealmeida 21 May 2026 | 04:26 Ad Infinitum Florence Maurice 21 May 2026 | 07:20 Denis 21 May 2026 | 07:45 Nilesh Prajapati 21 May 2026 | 08:15 Andy Bell 21 May 2026 | 08:15 Jake Archibald 21 May 2026 | 08:15 Manuel Matuzović 21 May 2026 | 08:15 fry69 21 May 2026 | 08:45 Luke Hubbard 21 May 2026 | 08:45 Musaceae 21 May 2026 | 09:11 thenew 21 May 2026 | 09:11 Jakub Iwanowski 21 May 2026 | 09:11 PeskyPotato 21 May 2026 | 09:12 Jan 21 May 2026 | 09:12 Jeolen Bruine 21 May 2026 | 09:12 ysbreker 21 May 2026 | 09:12 kopio 21 May 2026 | 09:12 Krijn Hoetmer 21 May 2026 | 09:12 Manuel Matuzović 21 May 2026 | 09:12 Maarten 21 May 2026 | 09:12 Amelia Bellamy-Royds 21 May 2026 | 09:12 Oblomov 21 May 2026 | 09:12 Jason 21 May 2026 | 09:12 Eugenio Monforte 21 May 2026 | 09:12 Nic 21 May 2026 | 09:12 Tracey Jones 21 May 2026 | 09:12 Christopher Kirk-Nielsen 21 May 2026 | 09:12 sudoBash418 21 May 2026 | 09:12 gorsefan 21 May 2026 | 09:13 morganist 21 May 2026 | 09:13 Luke Hansford 21 May 2026 | 09:13 Val Packett 🧉 21 May 2026 | 09:13 Mia (web luddite) 21 May 2026 | 09:13 Strandell 21 May 2026 | 09:35 Carlos Espada 21 May 2026 | 09:35 kaiserkiwi :kiwibird: 21 May 2026 | 09:50 sdussaut 21 May 2026 | 09:50 Björn Odendahl 21 May 2026 | 11:10 André Goldmann 21 May 2026 | 11:27 joosteto 21 May 2026 | 11:27 Thain 21 May 2026 | 11:27 Paul van Buuren 🍉 21 May 2026 | 11:27 Martin 🧀 21 May 2026 | 11:27 Caspar Fairhall 21 May 2026 | 11:27 Jens Bannmann ⁂ 21 May 2026 | 11:27 :mastodon: decio 21 May 2026 | 11:28 Michael Piotrowski 21 May 2026 | 11:28 Ben ☀️shine 21 May 2026 | 11:28 Ana Rodrigues 21 May 2026 | 11:28 Sara Joy ☠️ 21 May 2026 | 11:35 Ana Rodrigues 21 May 2026 | 11:35 Baldur Bjarnason 21 May 2026 | 11:45 Cyprien 21 May 2026 | 11:50 Eystein 21 May 2026 | 11:50 Jennifer Moore 😷 21 May 2026 | 11:50 DansLeRuSH ᴱᶰ 21 May 2026 | 11:50 Brandon Kelly 21 May 2026 | 12:20 Ben Baker 21 May 2026 | 12:20 Christian Alder 21 May 2026 | 12:20 Samy 21 May 2026 | 12:20 Jan-Hendrik 21 May 2026 | 12:20 Pen 21 May 2026 | 12:20 Florian Ziegler 21 May 2026 | 12:20 David Hund 🇳🇱🇪🇺 21 May 2026 | 12:20 HTPC NZ 21 May 2026 | 12:50 Timm Lichte 21 May 2026 | 12:50 Karoline 21 May 2026 | 12:50 clauwn 21 May 2026 | 12:50 Raquel 21 May 2026 | 12:50 Francesco 21 May 2026 | 12:50 Duke 21 May 2026 | 13:15 April 21 May 2026 | 13:15 Post Tenebras Lire 📚 21 May 2026 | 13:15 Columb Duffy 21 May 2026 | 13:45 Martin 21 May 2026 | 13:55 Christian "Schepp" Schaefer 21 May 2026 | 14:30 Henrik Pauli 21 May 2026 | 14:30 reallyzen 21 May 2026 | 14:55 Nils Hörrmann 21 May 2026 | 14:55 Iain Campbell 21 May 2026 | 16:25 +>e 21 May 2026 | 16:35 Laura 21 May 2026 | 16:35 Francesca Bo. 21 May 2026 | 17:05 devolute 21 May 2026 | 17:40 Craig Murdo 21 May 2026 | 17:40 Riku Voipio 21 May 2026 | 18:40 KanaMauna 21 May 2026 | 19:10 Enrico Zini 21 May 2026 | 19:10 Mike-麥-Mai-v1.618 😎 21 May 2026 | 20:40 Anna Maier 21 May 2026 | 20:40 Zach Leatherman 21 May 2026 | 21:10 JaGoTu 🦊🏳️🌈:unverified: 21 May 2026 | 21:35 Elefanten Peter 21 May 2026 | 21:35 Merospit 21 May 2026 | 21:35 Bruce Lawson ✅ ♫ ♿ ✌️♂️✊ 21 May 2026 | 21:35 Ricardo GTS 21 May 2026 | 22:10 Antony 21 May 2026 | 22:10 ironicmoka 21 May 2026 | 22:45 Harald Atteneder 21 May 2026 | 22:45 C++ Wage Slave 21 May 2026 | 23:20 Chris 21 May 2026 | 23:20 pulsation 21 May 2026 | 23:20 nzmathewb 21 May 2026 | 23:20 Nicole Parsons 21 May 2026 | 23:20 RalfMaximus 21 May 2026 | 23:20 Pierre Pezziardi 21 May 2026 | 23:20 ruben 21 May 2026 | 23:50 Xavier 21 May 2026 | 23:50 Solarbird :flag_cascadia: 22 May 2026 | 00:25 Chuso Pérez 22 May 2026 | 00:25 Adon Metcalfe 22 May 2026 | 00:25 Matthew Booth 22 May 2026 | 00:25 Bellycan 22 May 2026 | 00:55 Ross McKay 22 May 2026 | 00:55 Robert 22 May 2026 | 00:55 Daniel 🏳️🌈 Jilg :sondrine: 22 May 2026 | 00:55 eat up hungee boy 22 May 2026 | 00:55 The Halls Careen 22 May 2026 | 02:20 christian mock 22 May 2026 | 02:20 Juankz 22 May 2026 | 02:55 troy_friz_zell 22 May 2026 | 02:55 ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES 22 May 2026 | 02:55 Tim Severien 22 May 2026 | 06:00 atanasoff 22 May 2026 | 06:00 Kluthulhu' XOR 1=1-- 22 May 2026 | 06:30 Furbland's Very Cool Account™ 22 May 2026 | 06:30 patjouk 22 May 2026 | 07:35 Usually* Harmless 22 May 2026 | 07:35 Valentin 22 May 2026 | 09:00 Dorotheater 22 May 2026 | 09:35 John 22 May 2026 | 09:35 glsk 22 May 2026 | 10:30 Daniele 22 May 2026 | 10:55 Robert 22 May 2026 | 12:05 Aslak Raanes 22 May 2026 | 12:05 Hidde 22 May 2026 | 12:05 Pascal MARTIN 😶🌫️ 22 May 2026 | 12:15 hanno 22 May 2026 | 12:30 Guillaume Darmont 22 May 2026 | 12:50 (((Klefstadmyr))) 22 May 2026 | 15:10 Jens Tangermann 22 May 2026 | 15:10 Theozilla 22 May 2026 | 16:50 called upon to Swerve 😝 22 May 2026 | 18:44 Curioso 🍉 🇺🇦 (jgg) 22 May 2026 | 20:45 Fabian Michael 22 May 2026 | 21:50 Wes Fenlon 22 May 2026 | 22:35 Dancho 22 May 2026 | 22:55 Evil Jim O’Donnell 23 May 2026 | 11:35 Florian Scholz 23 May 2026 | 12:45 meek cynics 23 May 2026 | 14:50 Ralf Göke 24 May 2026 | 09:20 aœ 24 May 2026 | 09:20 Christoph Koeberlin 24 May 2026 | 09:20 Daniel Utz 24 May 2026 | 09:50 Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦 24 May 2026 | 10:20 toco 24 May 2026 | 11:15 Julian :rainbow_heart: 24 May 2026 | 11:45 Lukas Bestle 24 May 2026 | 11:45 Thomas Müller 24 May 2026 | 15:55 Oskar im Keller 24 May 2026 | 19:25 Raphael Fetzer 26 May 2026 | 08:30 173 Likes sylvia 21 May 2026 | 03:25 scottjp.bsky.social 21 May 2026 | 03:25 Jacque Schrag 21 May 2026 | 03:25 Nic Chan 21 May 2026 | 03:25 Jürgen Šuvalov 21 May 2026 | 03:25 Vale 21 May 2026 | 03:25 Ovi Demetrian Jr 21 May 2026 | 05:55 Matías Juarez 🦋 21 May 2026 | 06:55 blokche 21 May 2026 | 06:55 Florian Sanders 21 May 2026 | 07:20 Gus 21 May 2026 | 07:20 Jordi Sánchez 21 May 2026 | 07:45 Andy Bell 21 May 2026 | 08:15 Manuel Matuzović 21 May 2026 | 08:15 Adrian Marius Popa 21 May 2026 | 08:15 Nilesh Prajapati 21 May 2026 | 08:15 Quinten Coret 21 May 2026 | 08:45 Rik Schennink 21 May 2026 | 08:45 fry69 21 May 2026 | 08:45 Jonathan 21 May 2026 | 09:05 Armand 21 May 2026 | 09:05 Dominik Dröscher 21 May 2026 | 09:10 Flo 21 May 2026 | 09:10 felix (grayscale) 🐺 21 May 2026 | 09:10 szeneviertel 21 May 2026 | 09:11 David Bushell 🪿 21 May 2026 | 09:11 Manuel Matuzović 21 May 2026 | 09:11 phil 21 May 2026 | 09:11 Fipp 21 May 2026 | 09:11 Oblomov 21 May 2026 | 09:11 Reinhard - wissen Sie 21 May 2026 | 09:11 Eugenio Monforte 21 May 2026 | 09:11 Ovi Demetrian Jr 21 May 2026 | 09:11 Tracey Jones 21 May 2026 | 09:11 Christopher Kirk-Nielsen 21 May 2026 | 09:11 sudoBash418 21 May 2026 | 09:11 camera 21 May 2026 | 09:11 Jonathan Yu 21 May 2026 | 09:11 Val Packett 🧉 21 May 2026 | 09:11 Mia (web luddite) 21 May 2026 | 09:11 Vale 21 May 2026 | 09:15 finxol 21 May 2026 | 09:35 Carlos Espada 21 May 2026 | 09:35 sdussaut 21 May 2026 | 09:50 Jonathan Schofield 21 May 2026 | 09:50 Ashley Claymore 21 May 2026 | 10:05 Björn Odendahl 21 May 2026 | 11:10 acd02.bsky.social 21 May 2026 | 11:10 Johanna Hörrmann 21 May 2026 | 11:27 Wenzel Massag 21 May 2026 | 11:27 Señor Rolando 21 May 2026 | 11:27 Bit Regurgitator 21 May 2026 | 11:27 Caspar Fairhall 21 May 2026 | 11:27 Jens Bannmann ⁂ 21 May 2026 | 11:27 :mastodon: decio 21 May 2026 | 11:27 clinis 21 May 2026 | 11:27 The Fulcrum 🏴☠️ ⛓️💥 🛠️ 21 May 2026 | 11:28 henning 21 May 2026 | 11:35 Ana Rodrigues 21 May 2026 | 11:35 Andy 21 May 2026 | 11:45 Ben Walker 21 May 2026 | 11:45 Ben Baker 21 May 2026 | 12:20 Emanuel "herschel_r" Kluge 🐿️ 21 May 2026 | 12:20 Brandon Kelly 21 May 2026 | 12:20 Koen Klaren 21 May 2026 | 12:20 Christian Alder 21 May 2026 | 12:20 Andy Beer 21 May 2026 | 12:20 Vika - Tori 21 May 2026 | 12:20 J. J. Zepfanman @disc... 21 May 2026 | 12:20 Jan-Hendrik 21 May 2026 | 12:20 Ruth Salter 21 May 2026 | 12:20 Florian Ziegler 21 May 2026 | 12:20 Bret Mogilefsky 21 May 2026 | 12:50 Raquel 21 May 2026 | 12:50 Misja van Laatum 21 May 2026 | 13:15 walter 21 May 2026 | 13:15 April 21 May 2026 | 13:15 Post Tenebras Lire 📚 21 May 2026 | 13:15 Columb Duffy 21 May 2026 | 13:45 Benedikt Groß 21 May 2026 | 13:45 Martin 21 May 2026 | 13:55 Boris 21 May 2026 | 14:25 Sam #1 21 May 2026 | 14:25 Václav Volhejn 21 May 2026 | 14:30 Mintptitza 21 May 2026 | 14:30 :solaris: Hex ⸳ Alice ΘΔ& 21 May 2026 | 14:30 Jim Jones 21 May 2026 | 14:30 Marcus Herrmann 21 May 2026 | 14:30 Christian "Schepp" Schaefer 21 May 2026 | 14:30 Henry 21 May 2026 | 14:30 Henrik Pauli 21 May 2026 | 14:30 Ryan Sutter 21 May 2026 | 14:45 Dana 21 May 2026 | 14:55 Nils Hörrmann 21 May 2026 | 14:55 twifkak 21 May 2026 | 16:00 Iain Campbell 21 May 2026 | 16:25 Nathan Vander Wilt 21 May 2026 | 16:35 Troels Thomsen 21 May 2026 | 17:05 armornick 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️ 21 May 2026 | 17:30 Steve Woodson, CPACC 21 May 2026 | 17:30 Craig Murdo 21 May 2026 | 17:40 cfd90 21 May 2026 | 17:40 Nick F 21 May 2026 | 18:15 Kate Nyhan 21 May 2026 | 19:10 psi 21 May 2026 | 19:35 cailleach 21 May 2026 | 20:40 Mike-麥-Mai-v1.618 😎 21 May 2026 | 20:40 fedetibaldo 21 May 2026 | 21:10 uncapybarable 21 May 2026 | 21:10 Triple ⁂ 21 May 2026 | 21:35 Zach Leatherman 21 May 2026 | 21:35 Mike @ Misaligned Markets 21 May 2026 | 22:10 ironicmoka 21 May 2026 | 22:45 Stefan Walter 21 May 2026 | 22:45 C++ Wage Slave 21 May 2026 | 23:20 Bob LeFridge :tinoflag: 21 May 2026 | 23:20 RalfMaximus 21 May 2026 | 23:20 Jonas Voss 21 May 2026 | 23:20 Pierre Pezziardi 21 May 2026 | 23:20 The Casual Critic 21 May 2026 | 23:50 ruben 21 May 2026 | 23:50 David Gerard 21 May 2026 | 23:50 Mark Croxton 22 May 2026 | 00:00 TriploidTree 22 May 2026 | 00:25 Athena 22 May 2026 | 00:25 Adon Metcalfe 22 May 2026 | 00:25 Matthew Booth 22 May 2026 | 00:25 Bellycan 22 May 2026 | 00:55 Ross McKay 22 May 2026 | 00:55 Daniel 🏳️🌈 Jilg :sondrine: 22 May 2026 | 00:55 Nelson 22 May 2026 | 02:20 Stephen Shankland 22 May 2026 | 02:20 Aeryn is sort of a Fern 22 May 2026 | 02:55 ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES 22 May 2026 | 02:55 🇪🇺 Paul Schoonhoven 🍋🍉 22 May 2026 | 03:30 Dennis Frank 22 May 2026 | 04:00 Kluthulhu' XOR 1=1-- 22 May 2026 | 06:30 Ryan Brooks 22 May 2026 | 07:05 Eckes :mastodon: 22 May 2026 | 07:05 Ondřej Pokorný 22 May 2026 | 08:00 Rémi Forte 22 May 2026 | 08:25 Fiona 22 May 2026 | 08:35 Jørn 22 May 2026 | 08:35 Valentin 22 May 2026 | 09:00 John 22 May 2026 | 09:35 Kevin Renskers 🇺🇦🇪🇺 22 May 2026 | 10:00 Pablo Iriarte 22 May 2026 | 10:30 Daniele 22 May 2026 | 10:55 Bart Coppens 22 May 2026 | 11:30 Michelle Barker 22 May 2026 | 12:05 Pascal MARTIN 😶🌫️ 22 May 2026 | 12:15 Jonathan Jenne 22 May 2026 | 14:43 Jens Tangermann 22 May 2026 | 15:10 Jason Heppler 22 May 2026 | 15:10 Greg Lloyd 22 May 2026 | 16:05 Carl Vuorinen 22 May 2026 | 17:40 Dancho 22 May 2026 | 22:55 Alex Hedges 23 May 2026 | 02:10 meek cynics 23 May 2026 | 14:50 NoYearZero 23 May 2026 | 16:00 autumnstuff 23 May 2026 | 18:10 Ben Hutchings 23 May 2026 | 22:50 Udo Meisen 23 May 2026 | 22:50 Luke Dorny :CameraPolaroid: 24 May 2026 | 09:20 Ralf Göke 24 May 2026 | 09:20 Marcin Wichary 24 May 2026 | 09:20 Christoph Koeberlin 24 May 2026 | 09:20 Karol Wąsowski 24 May 2026 | 09:20 Matt 24 May 2026 | 10:20 toco 24 May 2026 | 11:15 Thomas Müller 24 May 2026 | 15:55 René Henrich 24 May 2026 | 17:00 Oskar im Keller 24 May 2026 | 19:25 ⓘ Webmentions are a way to notify other websites when you link to them, and to receive notifications when others link to you. Learn more about Webmentions. Have you published a response to this? Send me a webmention by letting me know the URL. Ping! More Notes Lazy and Prompt Buckle Up At Machine Speed Hello Again, World
Jonathan Schofield 20 May 2026 | 20:01 …“Google thinks it no longer needs ad slots to deliver ads. What it needs is you. Your emails, your files, your calendar, your purchase history, your travel plans – all flowing into Spark, all building the richest possible picture of who you are and what you’re likely to click on. That’s exactly the kind of personal context auction models need to work.” — ...
pablolarah 21 May 2026 | 02:42 ♾️ Ad Infinitum by @matthiasott At Google I/O this week, the company announced the biggest change to Search in 25 years. #advertising #AI #google #privacy #search #web https://matthiasott.com/notes/ad-infinitum advertising ai google privacy search web
Christopher Kirk-Nielsen 21 May 2026 | 03:40 @matthiasott It's mind boggling. It's like blockchain all over again, some person has the idea of "let's use it for everything" except this time it made it to some stakeholder at Google and they're killing their flagship product for… sloppy results which won't drive any traffic to the very sources they slurped up? Eesh, count me out. (well I am already not using Google Search personally, but count me out twice ...
Amelia Bellamy-Royds 21 May 2026 | 06:51 @matthiasott This is an excellent write-up Matthias, following the money to find the gotcha under all the gloss. I still suspect they will eventually include conventional advertisements, but covert ads in AI answers are more concerning. Most countries have either regulations or media-industry standards requiring advertising & paid placement content to be identified. Public pressure will be needed to keep that so. ...
mantish 21 May 2026 | 07:35 @matthiasott great article! "Google is betting its entire future on a world where people eagerly hand over their emails, their files, their habits, and their trust" They have such a big market share and they know people don't really make this choice consciously. Most people are unaware or don't make a big deal out of this.
Rik Schennink 21 May 2026 | 08:22 If ad disclosure is a legal requirement, and ads are so intertwined with the conversation as to be unrecognizable, then would this mean that the entire conversation with Gemini should be clearly marked as an ad?
Matthias Ott 21 May 2026 | 08:32 Yes, I thought about that too… Will there be little “sponsored reply” badges everywhere? Probably not. But will the whole product then marked as advertisement? I have no idea.
Marcel Haas 🟥 21 May 2026 | 08:31 That could just be three words on top of the page that some users might actually catch on their first use. Within hours, perhaps days, everybody will just ignore it and use the content as if it were genuine.
Rik Schennink 21 May 2026 | 08:52 I'm sure they'll put max effort into finding the perfect opacity level and font size for their disclaimer.
Sylvain Wallez 21 May 2026 | 08:26 "There’s a small but growing body of research exploring exactly how ads could work inside LLM-generated output. And the ideas are as fascinating as they are unsettling". Google doesn't need the web anymore. It needs your data as context for a token bidding engine. matthiasott.com/notes/ad-inf...
Marco 🇪🇺 21 May 2026 | 08:51 @matthiasott another thing is that I can‘t decide anymore to not see ads. Currently we can use content blockers to get a more peaceful and less distracting browsing experience. We are able to decide which sites we support by selectively allowing ads to be visible. This isn’t that easy anymore with the new ad mode (maybe using local ai to rewrite the results to cut out the intrusive content but might be hard ...
Matthias Ott 21 May 2026 | 08:57 Oh! Listening to my favorite podcast @shoptalkshow.com reminded me that I forgot to connect the dots to another, probably totally unrelated detail: that Chrome just shipped with the Prompt API and a 4GB Gemini Nano model, despite pushback from other browser makers. matthiasott.com/notes/lazy-a...
Bastian Allgeier 21 May 2026 | 09:48 Google's plans from this year's I/O are beyond dystopian. @matthiasott is doing a great job to summarize it all: https://matthiasott.com/notes/ad-infinitum Ad Infinitum · Matthias Ott
Caspar Fairhall 21 May 2026 | 10:36 @matthiasott Unsettling, indeed. Terrifying might be an even more apt adjective.
Pier #0 21 May 2026 | 11:22 @matthiasott spiega l'ultima scommessa di Google: nell'era dell'AI, la pubblicità diventa invisibile perché diventa il contenuto stesso. https://matthiasott.com/notes/ad-infinitum Ad Infinitum · Matthias Ott
Jon Henshaw 21 May 2026 | 13:29 @matthiasott Ahhh, here they are! https://blog.google/products/ads-commerce/google-marketing-live-search-ads/ A new generation of ads for the AI era of Search
KanaMauna 21 May 2026 | 19:10 @matthiasott I am assuming that the ads will include paid political advertisements. Doesn’t this get pretty close to political subliminal messaging propaganda?
Andrew Wippler 21 May 2026 | 20:32 @matthiasott Google took the traffic that would cost you bandwidth and decided to pay for it themselves. They will go bankrupt by hogging all the traffic. Down in a blaze of glory.
Simplicator 21 May 2026 | 23:19 @matthiasott #Google = #PlatosWindowlessCell google platoswindowlesscell
Reilly Spitzfaden (they/them) 22 May 2026 | 01:34 > So yes, Google didn’t talk about ads in the I/O keynote. Everything they announced is the new ad system. One that, in the eyes of Google, no longer needs the open web as an intermediary. And now, they’re gradually turning it on. matthiasott.com/notes/ad-inf...
Reilly Spitzfaden (they/them) 22 May 2026 | 01:36 > The language throughout is about being “helpful” and “building trust.” The mechanism is paid content inside AI-generated recommendations, written by the same model that’s supposed to give you neutral answers.
Reilly Spitzfaden (they/them) 22 May 2026 | 01:37 > “One approach, proposed by Google Research, is what you might call a “token auction”… Each advertiser brings their own LLM, and an auction mechanism decides whose model gets to influence the next word. The output is a weighted blend of competing interests, shaped by who’s willing to pay more.”
Reilly Spitzfaden (they/them) 22 May 2026 | 01:40 If you're as disturbed as I am by Google's pivot to AI in their search, here are a few alternatives: - startpage.com — privacy-preserving, pulls results from Google/Bing's databases. - SearXNG: software anyone can host to pull from many search engines. List of hosted URLs here: searx.space
Reilly Spitzfaden (they/them) 22 May 2026 | 01:42 For both Startpage and SearXNG, you can right-click in the Firefox URL bar and there should be an option to add it as a search engine. For the list of SearXNG URLs above, I usually type my country into the “country” box to get one located nearby (for speed reasons).
troy_friz_zell 22 May 2026 | 02:41 @matthiasott Motherfuckers are high on their own supply. When I search the web, I don't want a story from a spicy autocomplete. I am trying to find a link to an actual expert. This is exactly the opposite of what I want. I will never use it. That said, good. I hope this brings their entire evil empire crashing to the ground.
Tim Severien 22 May 2026 | 05:32 @matthiasott I expect these ad-sprinkled LLM outputs will be really bad for users if they're not clearly presented as ads due to the automation bias. I also wonder how Google plans to combat misinformation and such. Surely some political movements and lobbying industries are happy to spend a big ol' bag o' money to nudge answes to their favour. Pretty sure that there's a financial asymmetry between fossil fuel ...
Kevin 22 May 2026 | 05:50 @ambientspace G00gley eyes' ads suck. They are very random and irrelevant for me even though I allow them to track me from site to site.
Kevin 22 May 2026 | 05:54 @codecapitano @matthiasott I allow all ads but the problem is the ads are overlapping each other since there are so many. I cannot count the number of ads I see on a webpage because they blink so fast and reload over and over. It is very comical. XD
Matej Lexa 22 May 2026 | 08:43 But where are the ads!? Interesting observations from @matthiasott. Especially the two possible models of combining LLMs and ads - go to the blog post to read about them. Meanwhile some excerpts: --- At Google I/O this week, the company announced the biggest change to Search in 25 years. The ten blue links? Gone. Instead, you get “generative UI” – custom interactive widgets, built on the fly by Gemini. You ...
Sara Soueidan 22 May 2026 | 11:33 "For 25 years, Google Search was built on a contract. The web provided the content – billions of pages, freely linked, freely crawled. In return, Google sent people back. The link was the unit of exchange. [...] That contract is now broken. Generative UI doesn’t link to your article. It absorbs your article, synthesizes it into a widget, and presents it as Google’s own answer. Information agents don’t ...
Bruce Lawson ✅ ♫ ♿ ✌️♂️✊ 22 May 2026 | 11:37 Read this. "Google didn’t talk about ads in the I/O keynote. Everything they announced is the new ad system. One that, in the eyes of Google, no longer needs the open web as an intermediary … Google is betting its entire future on a world where people eagerly hand over their emails, their files, their habits, and their trust – to an AI system that will quietly auction off their attention, word by word, to ...
Hidde 22 May 2026 | 11:49 🔗 “Google didn’t talk about ads in the I/O keynote. Everything they announced is the new ad system. One that, in the eyes of Google, no longer needs the open web as an intermediary. And now, they’re gradually turning it on.” — @matthiasott https://matthiasott.com/notes/ad-infinitum Ad Infinitum · Matthias Ott
Jeffrey Yasskin 22 May 2026 | 16:27 @hdv @matthiasott So, I'm as horrified as anyone by the prospect of advertisers buying influence over the main search results, and I've already switched to kagi.com over the general AI slop in Google results, but the article misleadingly omits that the actual Google demos still say "Sponsored" over all the advertise-controlled content.
Wes Fenlon 22 May 2026 | 16:27 Wow, Google figured it out. They actually figured out how to build Hell and make us live in it matthiasott.com/notes/ad-inf...
homembarata.bsky.social 22 May 2026 | 18:16 We used to search things and find exactly what we wanted on the internet, back in my days
Shoalfield 22 May 2026 | 17:01 It is genuinely difficult to describe both how revolutionary google search was as a tool for information handling, and how fucking steep its decline has been.
Viviana 22 May 2026 | 16:51 @matthiasott Reading your post I have to think about "The Circle" and shudder ...
AutoModerator 22 May 2026 | 16:53 Friendly reminder: if you're looking for a Google service or Google product alternative then feel free to check out our sidebar. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
Azar42 22 May 2026 | 16:54 I found this bit of this article chilling: Another approach – also from Google researchers – fits the new “Search” much more precisely. It’s called “prominence allocation.” Here, when a user submits a query with commercial intent, the system runs an auction that doesn’t just decide which ads appear, but how prominently the LLM writes about each one. The auction outputs a prominence score for each ...
Grumpfeljens 23 May 2026 | 14:20 War eine schöne Zeit mit #webseiten . Aber alles Gute findet mal sein Ende. 😬 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xpk7soxvOMY Mit Infos von @matthiasott https://matthiasott.com/notes/ad-infinitum webseiten Google might have just killed websites
Trooper_Tales 24 May 2026 | 17:44 This is going to be the misinformation of the century when applied to so many chrome and google search users.
Frontend Dogma 24 May 2026 | 22:20 Ad Infinitum, by @matthiasott: https://matthiasott.com/notes/ad-infinitum?ref=frontenddogma.com #google #search #ai #economics ai economics google search Ad Infinitum · Matthias Ott
Stefan Grund :eay: 24 May 2026 | 23:49 Ad Infinitum / Zu Googles angekündigter AI-Suche → https://matthiasott.com/notes/ad-infinitum @matthiasott fast zusammen, was Google eigentlich auf seiner AI-durchtränkten I/O-Keynote – hier der 54 Sekunden lange AI-Supercut – angekündigt, aber nicht explizit gesagt hat: Nämlich dass sie ihre bisherigen Quellen – das Open Web – und das eigene Geschäftsmodell – die Werbelinks in den ...