cd /news/ai-policy/u-s-appeals-court-blocks-minnesota-l… · home › topics › ai-policy › article
[ARTICLE · art-144177] src=mprnews.org ↗ pub= topic=ai-policy verified=true sentiment=· neutral

U.S. appeals court blocks Minnesota law barring 'nudified' photos in XAI lawsuit

The St. Louis-based 8th US Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday granted Elon Musk's xAI an injunction halting Minnesota's first-in-the-nation ban on AI-generated fake nude images while the company's lawsuit alleging the law is unconstitutional proceeds. The Minnesota anti-"nudification" law, which took effect on August 1, bars website operators and software developers from letting users create realistic images depicting an intimate body part not shown in an original photo of an identifiable individual; US District Judge Donovan Frank had ruled last month that xAI failed to show irreparable harm and waited too long to seek emergency relief. Minnesota has said it adopted the measure to combat what it called a "staggering amount (of) child sexual abuse material that AI products like Grok Imagine generate.

read2 min views1 publishedOct 2, 2026
U.S. appeals court blocks Minnesota law barring 'nudified' photos in XAI lawsuit
Image: Mprnews (auto-discovered)

Go Deeper.

Create an account or log in to save stories.

Like this?

Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.

Elon Musk's xAI on Friday persuaded a US federal appeals court to halt Minnesota's first-in-the-nation ban on AI-generated fake nude images as the technology and social media company pursues a lawsuit alleging that the law is unconstitutional.

The St. Louis-based 8th US Circuit Court of Appeals in its order put the law on hold for now, granting a request for an injunction by xAI. A lower court judge last month had rejected Musk’s bid for an order stopping the law.

The state's anti-"nudification" law, which took effect on August 1, prohibits website operators, software developers and others from allowing users to create realistic images depicting an intimate body part that is not shown in an original photo of an identifiable individual.

xAI alleges the measure restricts free speech protected by the US Constitution.

Turn Up Your Support #

MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all.

Minnesota and xAI did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

US District Judge Donovan Frank ruled last month that xAI had not shown it would suffer irreparable harm while challenging the law and said the company had waited too long to seek emergency relief.

In its appeal, xAI disputed the judge's finding that it delayed bringing suit. The company also said its Grok Imagine tool includes "rigorous protections" against creating nudified or sexualized images of real people.

xAI has begun suing users whom it alleges are evading Grok’s technological blockers to create sexual images of people without their consent.

Minnesota had urged the appeals court not to block the law. The state has said it adopted the measure this year to combat the spread of what it called a “staggering amount (of) child sexual abuse material that AI products like Grok Imagine generate.”

── more in #ai-policy 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @xai 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
→ Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host ✓
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/u-s-appeals-court-bl…] indexed:0 read:2min 2026-10-02 · —