Ninety-five percent of organizations believe they have visibility into their AI and machine identity exposures, yet only 36% are actually monitoring them.
SpyCloud, the leader in identity threat protection, today released its annual SpyCloud Identity Threat Report, a survey-based study finding that non-human identities (NHIs) – the AI agents, service accounts, API keys, and authentication tokens that connect to internal systems – have become the most common route attackers take into the enterprise.
SpyCloud 2026 Identity Threat Report, Source: SpyCloud
The survey found that compromised NHIs (31%) are nearly 2x as likely to be the primary entry point compared to phishing and social engineering (17%), the second-ranked answer. NHI-related misuse was also the most commonly reported identity-based event type at 42%, yet the vast majority of organizations aren’t watching for them. While 95% of organizations believe they have adequate visibility into AI- and NHI-related exposures, only 36% monitor them, making machine identities the least-watched category of identity risk in the report. Further amplifying the problem, 68% of organizations experienced an identity-based event in the same period, with those affected averaging eight events each.
Organizations typically maintain a clear inventory of their human workforce, but few extend that same visibility to the service accounts, API keys, and AI agents authenticating into their systems every day. These identities are provisioned for convenience and often hold real privilege, yet in most environments nobody owns them: a service account doesn’t get off-boarded, doesn’t rotate its own credentials, and doesn’t fail an MFA challenge, so once one is exposed it can stay usable for months.
“That asymmetry is what attackers are exploiting,” said Trevor Hilligoss, SpyCloud’s Chief Intelligence Officer. “Every one of these identities is a standing invitation that renews itself until someone notices.”
This year’s report is based on a survey of 750 cybersecurity leaders and practitioners at organizations with 500+ employees across North America (US and Canada), the United Kingdom, and select European markets – Spain, Germany, the Netherlands, Austria, and Switzerland. It benchmarks how organizations detect, remediate, and govern identity threats across human and non-human identities.
Additional key findings include:
Non-human identities and third-party exposures are creating new paths into the enterprise, while stolen sessions give attackers ways around controls designed to protect authenticated users.
“Every control that works pushes attackers toward what it doesn’t cover – we hardened passwords, so they targeted sessions; we tightened employee accounts, so they looked to service accounts and vendor connections,” added Hilligoss. “SpyCloud continues to track threat actor behavior closely to understand where attackers are moving, what data they value, and how those patterns evolve over time.”
Continuous monitoring & automation separate the most resilient identity programs
Identity exposure creates an ongoing operational burden that extends well beyond the initial incident, and how quickly organizations respond has a direct impact on business outcomes. Those relying on manual, case-by-case remediation reported higher incident response costs than organizations with high levels of automation (39% versus 32%) and greater loss of customer or partner trust (47% versus 36%).
The report also introduces SpyCloud’s Identity Threat Protection Maturity Model, which groups respondents into four maturity tiers – Reactive, Building, Operational, and Optimized – across identity exposure visibility, monitoring, governance, automation, and remediation. The findings reflect that the more mature an identity program gets, the more it relies on continuous identity exposure monitoring and automated remediation – and that combination is what actually drives incident rates down.
At enterprise scale, some share of an organization’s employees, vendors, and machine accounts will be exposed in the near future regardless of how strong its controls are. What changes business outcomes is how long that exposure stays usable.
“Most identity programs are still measured on whether an exposure happened. That’s the wrong scoreboard,” said Damon Fleury, Chief Product Officer at SpyCloud. “Organizations that pair continuous identity monitoring with automated remediation of workforce exposures create the greatest friction for criminals and gain the biggest edge in preventing follow-on attacks.”
Users can access the full, no form-fill 2026 SpyCloud Identity Threat Report and benchmark their organization against the Identity Threat Protection Maturity Model by taking the free assessment here.
About SpyCloud
SpyCloud transforms recaptured darknet data to disrupt cybercrime. Its automated identity threat protection solutions use advanced analytics and AI to accelerate investigations and protect workforce, consumer, and supplier identities from the threats that matter most: authentication bypass, session hijacking, malicious insiders, account takeover, ransomware, and fraud. Its data from malware-infected devices, successful phishes, combolists, and third-party breaches also powers many popular dark web monitoring and identity theft protection offerings. Customers include 7 of the Fortune 10, along with hundreds of global enterprises, mid-sized companies, and government agencies worldwide. Headquartered in Austin, TX, SpyCloud is home to more than 250 cybersecurity experts whose mission is to protect businesses and consumers from the stolen identity data criminals are using to target them now.
To learn more and see insights on your company’s exposed data, visit spycloud.com.
Account Director
Emily Brown
REQ on behalf of SpyCloud
spycloud@req.co