StoreReady launched as a Show HN comparison tool that scores AI app builders on their ability to clear Apple App Store review, publishing head-to-head verdicts on six pairs including Rork vs Vibecode, Rork vs a0.dev, Vibecode vs Replit Mobile, Bolt.new vs Rork, Lovable vs Rork, and FlutterFlow vs Rork. The corpus found no published record of App Store review outcomes for Rork, Vibecode, a0.dev, or Replit Mobile, and concluded Lovable does not generate React Native at all, meaning a wrapped web app would fall under guideline 4.2. StoreReady's stated finding is that a0.dev has no evidence establishing what happens at submission, while FlutterFlow carries years of App Store history and Bolt.new documents that it stops at source code, requiring users to run `eas build --platform ios --auto-submit` themselves.
The docket
Every builder, its answer to the same five questions, and the sources behind it. Open a row to read them. The last row is a hand-written Expo and EAS baseline, carried as a control so the rest can be read against what the builders are automating.
Head to head
The six pairs the corpus resolves, each one a verdict written against both records.
EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.