cd /news/ai-infrastructure/quota-increase-request-academic-data… · home topics ai-infrastructure article
[ARTICLE · art-91707] src=discuss.huggingface.co ↗ pub= topic=ai-infrastructure verified=true sentiment=· neutral

[Quota Increase Request] Academic Dataset Storage for [TUTTI]

Hugging Face's storage limits documentation directs research and non-profit projects seeking dataset storage grants to email datasets@huggingface.co with a detailed proposal, but grants are case-by-case and not guaranteed for academic projects. The dataset page currently reports a total file size of about 8.61 TB, while the original request cited 8.3 TB needed with 7.83 TB quota reached, suggesting the situation may have changed.

read2 min views1 publishedAug 11, 2026

Hmm… I don’t know whether 8.3 TB would be approved, but I think making the request by email (datasets@huggingface.co

) would be the more reliable route:

If this is still unresolved, the current Hugging Face [Storage Limits documentation](https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/storage-limits) explicitly points dataset storage-grant requests from research/non-profit projects to ** datasets@huggingface.co**, with a detailed proposal.

So I would probably use that as the primary route rather than relying on the forum post alone.

I would include at least:

The main thing I would be cautious about is the grant itself. The public documentation describes these grants as case-by-case, rather than as an automatic academic entitlement. So I don’t think we can infer from the public docs that an academic project will necessarily receive ~8.3 TB, or that a Free account will automatically be allowed that amount under a grant.

In other words, I think the part we can answer fairly confidently is where to ask; the part only HF can really answer is what storage arrangement they would approve for this project.

There is also a small wrinkle: the dataset page currently appears to report a total file size of about 8.61 TB, even though the original post says 8.3TB needed (7.83TB quota reached)

. So it is quite possible that the situation has already changed since this post was made — perhaps the upload continued, the quota changed, or some other arrangement was made. I wouldn’t try to infer which from the public page alone.

So if you have already solved the immediate problem, this may be moot. But if you still need a formal quota/grant arrangement — especially if model weights or additional artifacts are still to come — the email route still seems like the clearest documented next step.

How I would interpret Free vs. academic vs. storage grantSo, short version: if you still need the increase, I would email datasets@huggingface.co with the repository, current/expected total size, academic/public-release context, and whatever concrete impact/reuse information you have. The public docs give a fairly clear route for making the request; they just don’t give us enough information to predict whether ~8.3 TB will actually be granted.

── more in #ai-infrastructure 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @hugging face 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/quota-increase-reque…] indexed:0 read:2min 2026-08-11 ·