A plaintiff in Connecticut embedded invisible prompt injections in court filings, formatted in 3-point white text on a white background, to manipulate a potential AI review system. Judge Spader compared the attempt to secretly tampering with a jury and revoked the plaintiff's electronic filing privileges. The court stressed that Connecticut doesn't use AI to review filings, but the intent alone was enough to warrant sanctions.
The article Plaintiff hid invisible AI instructions in court filings to secretly influence automated review appeared first on The Decoder.
source & further reading
the-decoder.com — original article
World Labs turns one real-world robot task into thousands of simulated variations for training
The "tragedy of the cognitive commons" explains how rational AI adoption could destroy entire professions' expertise
New benchmark confirms AI models still perform poorly at visual perception