cd /news/ai-products/codex-users-debate-the-new-pet-featu… · home topics ai-products article
[ARTICLE · art-117634] src=community.openai.com ↗ pub= topic=ai-products verified=true sentiment=· neutral

Codex users debate the new Pet feature

OpenAI's Codex coding agent introduced a new 'Pet' feature, which has sparked debate among users on the OpenAI community forum, with some praising it as a creative task tracker and others criticizing it as a pointless gimmick. A new joiner on the Codex team revealed that the feature was shipped within a week of their start, created in free time using image generation, and was not expected to ship. The team remains focused on core issues and encourages users to report problems on GitHub.

read4 min views3 publishedSep 1, 2026
Codex users debate the new Pet feature
Image: source

What the heck is “Pet,” and why is OpenAI turning Codex into Windows by introducing junk features likey clippy with zero practical value?

Why are highly paid engineers being asked to spend time on features like this when Codex still has so many serious problems? OpenAI should focus its resources on improving performance, preventing intermittent crashes, and fixing the freezing that occurs when users start typing. I have noticed significant performance problems since the latest update.

What problem is Pet supposed to solve? It appears to do absolutely nothing useful. Honestly, it feels as though Codex is being managed by someone with MBA who prioritizes engagement gimmicks but has no understanding of how developers actually use the product.

Please focus on stability, performance, and the core developer experience before introducing pointless features like this.

I personally like the pet feature and feel like it adds some creativity to my day and is actually useful. It’s a nice way to keep track of active and recent status updates on tasks while I am working on something else. It’s okay to have a little fun while you work.

Meet Patch:

Patch is a little rascal, but at least he will dig up files for you… Be nice to Patch…

I guess I was wrong. It looks like this feature has a lot of fans, and many people are speaking highly of it. So I guess it’s just not for me.

jureka 7 The actual plushy is irrelevant. It’s a creative, smart way to keep track of your ongoing tasks without constantly switching attention to a full separate screen. That is, if you work on multiple spaces. Personally, I have like 8 virtual screens and 2 physical ones, minimum, at all times. So I find the pet pretty great, although I am relatively immune to bloatware. AI is fuelling feature overload, lol

I told Codex to edit/create a local version of the “Hatch Pet” skill that supports higher frame rate, starting new sessions, replying to plan and subagent spawning. In my case, I made different characters so I remember which pet does what (review, plan, code, read, etc.)

Why are highly paid engineers being asked to spend time on features like this when Codex still has so many serious problems?

Stumbled across this and thought I’d give some clarity. The Codex pet feature was a week 1 ship from a new joiner, I saw the feature and created the initial /hatch-pet skill (originally called codex-avatar-create) in my free time because I thought it would be cool to use imagegen to do so. Didn’t expect it to ship, and didn’t expect so many people to love it - very happy with the outcome though!

The Codex team is very focussed on problems, please open issues or upvote existing issues in Github so they can see them! GitHub - openai/codex: Lightweight coding agent that runs in your terminal · GitHub

I really like the new Pet feature, especially because ChatGPT creates multiple animations/poses for the Pet — such as waving, blinking, jumping, running, and resting.

However, on Android, the Pet currently seems to appear mainly while ChatGPT is Thinking. I would love to be able to interact with my Pet more directly during a conversation.

For example:

  • If I tell ChatGPT, “I’m really tired today,” my Pet could curl up or appear sleepy.
  • If I say, “I’m going to exercise,” my Pet could jump or run.
  • If I say, “I finished my project!”, my Pet could wave or jump excitedly.
  • If I ask, “Can my Pet say hello?”, it could wave.
  • If I say, “Show me my Pet,” the Pet could appear on demand.

This seems especially appropriate because ChatGPT has already created multiple visual states for the Pet. It would be wonderful if the AI could select those existing animations based on the context of the conversation.

I understand that some Pet animations may currently be tied to system states such as Thinking, waiting, or completing a task. I’m suggesting an additional capability: allow the conversational AI to invoke the existing Pet states when appropriate, or allow the user to explicitly request a particular animation.

For Android users in particular, this would make the Pet feel much more like a companion and much less like an indicator that only appears while ChatGPT is processing a response. Even a simple command system would be great, such as:

“Show my Pet.”

“Make my Pet wave.”

“Make my Pet jump.”

“Make my Pet run.”

“Make my Pet sleep.”

The animation assets already seem to exist. What appears to be missing is a way for the conversation/user to trigger them.

I’d love to see this functionality added to the Android ChatGPT app.

bears0 11 Another user mentioned using Codex to create their own local version of the “Hatch Pet” skill with custom features, so that may be an option, but you’d have to try it yourself.

── more in #ai-products 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @openai 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/codex-users-debate-t…] indexed:0 read:4min 2026-09-01 ·