The user believes a Daybreak warning may have preceded the closure; OpenAI's published guidance says a safety-check notice alone does not establish a policy violation.
By [Ryan Merket](https://runtimewire.com/author/ryan-merket)
· Published
· Updated
Primary source: [X](https://x.com/log4j/status/2113647464154857840)
Why it matters #
Daybreak permits approved reverse engineering in authorized environments.
OpenAI Codex user @log4j says OpenAI closed their account after they used the coding tool while doing local reverse-engineering work. In a four-post thread on X posted October 23rd, the user denied using OpenAI services to find vulnerabilities or exploit systems. The closure and its reason are reported by the user.…
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
source & further reading
runtimewire.com — original article
Kimi Code lists a faster K3.1 Pro tier that uses twice the quota
Moonshot AI makes Kimi Code ask before trusting project folders
Ai2 releases satellite embeddings that let mapping teams skip repeat model runs