cd /news/ai-safety/circuit-oracle-automating-attributio… · home › topics › ai-safety › article
[ARTICLE · art-163612] src=arxiv.org ↗ pub= topic=ai-safety verified=true sentiment=· neutral

Circuit Oracle: Automating Attribution Graph Analysis via Natural-Language Queries

A new arXiv paper (2611.00420v1) introduces Circuit Oracle, an off-the-shelf LLM with a multi-agent harness and task-specific authored skills that answers natural-language questions about a target model by reading its attribution graph through tool calls. Circuit Oracle reached 78.2 ± 2.4% accuracy on detecting spurious features in probe circuits, beating single-layer feature-ranking baselines, but on secret elicitation trained self-explainers such as Activation Oracles remained the stronger baseline, and on refusal suppression over 50 prompts its single committed intervention fell slightly below a diff-in-means baseline, exceeding it only when allowed the best of five attempts. The authors report results stable across five runs and across agent model choices, and release pruned subgraphs and context-specific feature readings that revise existing global labels.

by read1 min views1 publishedNov 4, 2026

arXiv:2611.00420v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Attribution graphs, an emerging tool in mechanistic interpretability, use transcoders to decompose language model computations into sparse interpretable features connected by causal edges. However, turning a graph into a safety-relevant insight requires hours of manual analysis by experts. We introduce Circuit Oracle, an off-the-shelf LLM equipped with a multi-agent harness and task-specific authored skills, which answers natural-language questions about a target model by reading the attribution graph through tool calls. We evaluate it on three safety-relevant proxy tasks: detecting spurious features in probe circuits, eliciting hidden knowledge from taboo-finetuned models, and suppression jailbreaking via feature-level interventions. Beyond task scores, the oracle produces pruned subgraphs and context-specific feature explanations that we assess qualitatively. Results are mixed. On spurious-feature detection, Circuit Oracle reaches 78.2 $\pm$ 2.4% accuracy, outperforming single-layer feature-ranking baselines. On secret elicitation, trained self-explainers like Activation Oracles remain the stronger baseline. On refusal suppression over 50 prompts, its single committed intervention is slightly below a diff-in-means baseline, and only exceeds it when allowed the best of five attempts. Results are stable across five runs and across model choices for the agents. We also release the pruned subgraphs and context-specific feature readings that revise existing global labels, and invite future work to develop evaluations that can measure their usefulness directly.

── more in #ai-safety 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @circuit oracle 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
→ Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host ✓
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/circuit-oracle-autom…] indexed:0 read:1min 2026-11-04 · —