cd /news/ai-tools/authors-guild-test-finds-some-ai-det… · home topics ai-tools article
[ARTICLE · art-39233] src=the-decoder.com ↗ pub= topic=ai-tools verified=true sentiment=· neutral

Authors Guild test finds some AI detectors perfectly identify human writing while others fail on every single text

The Authors Guild tested five AI detectors on human-written texts, finding that Pangram and Grammarly correctly identified all of them, while Sidekicker and ZeroGPT falsely flagged human-written articles as AI-generated. The Guild warned that professionally written texts statistically resemble AI output because language models were trained on such writing.

read1 min views1 publishedJun 25, 2026

The Authors Guild tested five AI detectors on human-written texts. Pangram and Grammarly correctly identified all of them, while Sidekicker and ZeroGPT flagged human-written articles as AI-generated. But the Guild also warns of a paradox: professionally written texts look statistically similar to AI output because language models were trained on exactly that kind of writing.

The article Authors Guild test finds some AI detectors perfectly identify human writing while others fail on every single text appeared first on The Decoder.

── more in #ai-tools 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @authors guild 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/authors-guild-test-f…] indexed:0 read:1min 2026-06-25 ·