arXiv:2611.09178v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While machine learning hiring tools are ubiquitous, the need for privacy regulations and commercial sensitivity makes public benchmarking legally complex. We address this challenge by introducing a taxonomy-driven, fully synthetic HR dataset and benchmark to simultaneously evaluate retrieval effectiveness and algorithmic fairness. Grounded in 660K real freelancer profiles, our multilingual corpus features candidate profiles, project briefs, and counterfactual demographic twins. Auditing state-of-the-art embedding models reveals performance divergence from general MTEB scores, alongside fairness disparities in grammatically gendered languages. This demonstrates that general benchmarks are insufficient for HR, requiring tailored evaluations to identify Pareto-optimal models that balance semantic accuracy and fairness.
A Taxonomy-Driven Synthetic Dataset for Retrieval Effectiveness and Fairness Evaluation in Hiring
A new arXiv paper (2611.09178v1) introduces a taxonomy-driven, fully synthetic HR dataset and benchmark built from 660K real freelancer profiles to evaluate retrieval effectiveness and algorithmic fairness simultaneously. Auditing state-of-the-art embedding models found performance diverging from general MTEB scores, plus fairness disparities in grammatically gendered languages, leading the authors to conclude general benchmarks are insufficient for hiring and that tailored evaluations are needed to identify Pareto-optimal models balancing semantic accuracy and fairness.
Run your AI side-project on zahid.host
EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.