cd /news/developer-tools/agentsview-vs-fast-resume Β· home β€Ί topics β€Ί developer-tools β€Ί article
[ARTICLE Β· art-119630] src=perrotta.dev β†— pub= topic=developer-tools verified=true sentiment=Β· neutral

AgentsView vs fast-resume

A developer's comparison of AgentsView v0.41.1 and fast-resume 2.11.2 concludes that fast-resume is preferable due to its simplicity, despite AgentsView offering broader session source support and advanced search features. AgentsView supports 59 session sources and nine agent types, while fast-resume supports 12 sources and 12 agents, with fast-resume's footprint being 14MB versus AgentsView's 116MB app and 28MB data directory.

read2 min views3 publishedSep 1, 2026

β™  Previously.

Problem statement: does AgentsView replace fast-resume, or do they solve different problems?

I installed both and compared their current releases:

% agentsview --version
agentsview v0.41.1 (commit a902515a, built 2026-08-18T13:34:56Z)
% fr --version
fr 2.11.2

fr

has one job: search local agent sessions and resume one in its native agent. Search is typo-tolerant. Enter

replaces fr

with the original agent process and restores its working directory:

Agent stores ──► adapters ──► normalized sessions ──► Tantivy index
                                                        β”‚
Terminal ◄──── resume handoff ◄──── TUI/search β—„β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜

AgentsView is a persistent SQLite archive with a desktop app, local web UI, CLI, REST API, MCP server, cost reports, and session health signals. Its search surface is correspondingly larger:

% agentsview session search --help | grep -E -- '--(fts|hybrid|regex|semantic|in )'
      --fts                      Fast tokenized FTS over messages only
      --hybrid                   Hybrid semantic + full-text search (reciprocal rank fusion)
      --in string                Comma-separated sources: messages,tool_input,tool_result (default all)
      --regex                    Treat pattern as an RE2 regex
      --semantic                 Semantic (vector) search over user/assistant messages

AgentsView documents 59 session sources against fr

’s 12. Resume support is the opposite: AgentsView maps nine agent types, while fr

has handoff commands for all twelve, including Pi:

Pi β†’ pi --session <id>

claude, codex, traex, copilot, cursor, gemini, opencode, amp, kiro

The local footprint shows the difference in scope:

% du -sh /opt/homebrew/Cellar/fast-resume/2.11.2 \
    /Applications/AgentsView.app ~/.cache/fast-resume ~/.agentsview
14M     /opt/homebrew/Cellar/fast-resume/2.11.2
116M    /Applications/AgentsView.app
772K    /Users/tperrotta/.cache/fast-resume
28M     /Users/tperrotta/.agentsview

fr

treats its index as a disposable cache. AgentsView keeps sessions until agentsview prune

removes them. It also sends an anonymous daily liveness ping and checks for updates; fr

2.11.2 has neither mechanism.

Given the aforementioned trade-offs: I am happier with fr

. KISS.

πŸ€– *Drafted with * ∎

/bloggify

.β€” Β§ β€”

Reply via [email](mailto:serendipity@perrotta.dev?subject=Reply to: AgentsView vs fast-resume)

── more in #developer-tools 4 stories Β· sorted by recency
── more on @agentsview 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain β€” perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
β†’ Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host βœ“
Get free account β†’ Pricing
from €0/mo Β· no card required
LIVE [news/agentsview-vs-fast-r…] indexed:0 read:2min 2026-09-01 Β· β€”