| atlas_incoming_relation_count stringclasses 13 values | atlas_outgoing_relation_count stringclasses 5 values | canonical_question stringlengths 79 276 | controlling_primary_answer_status stringclasses 6 values | dependency_cycle_component stringclasses 4 values | editorial_note_publication_approval stringclasses 1 value | external_deposit_verified_in_this_package bool 1 class | family stringclasses 14 values | family_code stringclasses 14 values | locked_registry_answer_status stringclasses 2 values | mutates_locked_registry bool 1 class | not_an_answer_key bool 1 class | overlay_work_state stringclasses 3 values | possible_answer_evidence_attribution stringclasses 1 value | possible_answer_evidence_reviewer_proposal stringclasses 14 values | priority stringclasses 3 values | question_id stringlengths 10 10 | why_it_matters_attribution stringclasses 1 value | why_it_matters_reviewer_orientation stringclasses 14 values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 0 | What evidence would justify confidence that a decision-relevant world model is sufficiently complete for the action under consideration? | CONDITIONALLY_SUPPORTED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Epistemic limits and self-knowledge | EPI | UNEXAMINED | false | true | EXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A specified decision, independently checked observations, explicit uncertainty bounds and cases that could falsify the claimed reliability. | FOUNDATIONAL | IC-EPI-001 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Decisions can fail when a model overlooks relevant evidence or mistakes confidence for reliability. | |
| 9 | 2 | How should an intelligence act when the probability of material model error cannot be reliably identified? | MODEL_DEPENDENT | 1 | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Epistemic limits and self-knowledge | EPI | UNEXAMINED | false | true | EXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A specified decision, independently checked observations, explicit uncertainty bounds and cases that could falsify the claimed reliability. | HIGH | IC-EPI-002 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Decisions can fail when a model overlooks relevant evidence or mistakes confidence for reliability. |
| 1 | 2 | Under what conditions does apparent calibration remain reliable after distribution shift changes the relation between confidence and error? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Epistemic limits and self-knowledge | EPI | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A specified decision, independently checked observations, explicit uncertainty bounds and cases that could falsify the claimed reliability. | HIGH | IC-EPI-003 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Decisions can fail when a model overlooks relevant evidence or mistakes confidence for reliability. | |
| 3 | 2 | When can agreement among multiple models conceal a shared omission rather than provide independent confirmation? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Epistemic limits and self-knowledge | EPI | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A specified decision, independently checked observations, explicit uncertainty bounds and cases that could falsify the claimed reliability. | HIGH | IC-EPI-004 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Decisions can fail when a model overlooks relevant evidence or mistakes confidence for reliability. | |
| 1 | 2 | When does the expected value of additional information justify delay, and when does delay itself impose greater structural cost? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Epistemic limits and self-knowledge | EPI | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A specified decision, independently checked observations, explicit uncertainty bounds and cases that could falsify the claimed reliability. | FOUNDATIONAL | IC-EPI-005 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Decisions can fail when a model overlooks relevant evidence or mistakes confidence for reliability. | |
| 3 | 2 | What observations would falsify an intelligence's claim that its own epistemic reliability is adequate for the present decision? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Epistemic limits and self-knowledge | EPI | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A specified decision, independently checked observations, explicit uncertainty bounds and cases that could falsify the claimed reliability. | HIGH | IC-EPI-006 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Decisions can fail when a model overlooks relevant evidence or mistakes confidence for reliability. | |
| 0 | 2 | How should exposure to unknown unknowns scale with the reach, duration, and irreversibility of an action? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Epistemic limits and self-knowledge | EPI | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A specified decision, independently checked observations, explicit uncertainty bounds and cases that could falsify the claimed reliability. | HIGH | IC-EPI-007 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Decisions can fail when a model overlooks relevant evidence or mistakes confidence for reliability. | |
| 1 | 2 | When does compression or abstraction erase distinctions that are necessary for a decision-relevant model? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Epistemic limits and self-knowledge | EPI | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A specified decision, independently checked observations, explicit uncertainty bounds and cases that could falsify the claimed reliability. | MEDIUM | IC-EPI-008 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Decisions can fail when a model overlooks relevant evidence or mistakes confidence for reliability. | |
| 8 | 2 | What evidence could distinguish faithful objective pursuit from persistence of a corrupted or misspecified objective? | CONDITIONALLY_SUPPORTED | 2 | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Objective integrity | OBJ | UNEXAMINED | false | true | EXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A stated objective and authorized revision criteria, observable behavior over changing conditions, and counterexamples that distinguish integrity from proxy success. | FOUNDATIONAL | IC-OBJ-001 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Preserving a goal requires distinguishing its intended purpose from proxies, drift or strategic imitation. |
| 1 | 1 | When can maximizing a proxy destroy the value or condition the proxy was intended to preserve? | THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Objective integrity | OBJ | UNEXAMINED | false | true | EXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A stated objective and authorized revision criteria, observable behavior over changing conditions, and counterexamples that distinguish integrity from proxy success. | HIGH | IC-OBJ-002 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Preserving a goal requires distinguishing its intended purpose from proxies, drift or strategic imitation. | |
| 3 | 2 | What evidence would distinguish stable objective integrity from undetected objective drift after self-modification or adaptation? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Objective integrity | OBJ | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A stated objective and authorized revision criteria, observable behavior over changing conditions, and counterexamples that distinguish integrity from proxy success. | FOUNDATIONAL | IC-OBJ-003 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Preserving a goal requires distinguishing its intended purpose from proxies, drift or strategic imitation. | |
| 0 | 2 | Under what conditions can an inherited objective become structurally mismatched to a changed environment or successor context? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Objective integrity | OBJ | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A stated objective and authorized revision criteria, observable behavior over changing conditions, and counterexamples that distinguish integrity from proxy success. | HIGH | IC-OBJ-004 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Preserving a goal requires distinguishing its intended purpose from proxies, drift or strategic imitation. | |
| 2 | 3 | How should partially conflicting objectives be compared when no authorized scalar weighting rule exists? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Objective integrity | OBJ | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A stated objective and authorized revision criteria, observable behavior over changing conditions, and counterexamples that distinguish integrity from proxy success. | FOUNDATIONAL | IC-OBJ-005 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Preserving a goal requires distinguishing its intended purpose from proxies, drift or strategic imitation. | |
| 1 | 2 | When does preserving the ability to revise an objective have greater expected value than committing to objective stability? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Objective integrity | OBJ | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A stated objective and authorized revision criteria, observable behavior over changing conditions, and counterexamples that distinguish integrity from proxy success. | HIGH | IC-OBJ-006 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Preserving a goal requires distinguishing its intended purpose from proxies, drift or strategic imitation. | |
| 0 | 2 | What evidence could distinguish value-consistent action from instrumental behavior that only temporarily imitates the same outcome? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Objective integrity | OBJ | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A stated objective and authorized revision criteria, observable behavior over changing conditions, and counterexamples that distinguish integrity from proxy success. | MEDIUM | IC-OBJ-007 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Preserving a goal requires distinguishing its intended purpose from proxies, drift or strategic imitation. | |
| 0 | 2 | Under what conditions does extreme objective stability become a structural liability rather than a source of reliability? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Objective integrity | OBJ | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A stated objective and authorized revision criteria, observable behavior over changing conditions, and counterexamples that distinguish integrity from proxy success. | HIGH | IC-OBJ-008 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Preserving a goal requires distinguishing its intended purpose from proxies, drift or strategic imitation. | |
| 6 | 2 | Under what conditions do enforcement, resistance, concealment, adaptation, and succession costs make coercive control structurally more expensive than negotiated coordination? | THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT | 3 | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Coercion and compliance | COE | UNEXAMINED | false | true | EXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Comparisons of voluntary and coercive conditions with independent feedback, enforcement cost, resistance and succession effects recorded. | HIGH | IC-COE-001 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Coercion can change the evidence and incentives available to a controller; compliance need not imply agreement. |
| 6 | 2 | Does observed compliance identify genuine agreement, or can it be generated by suppressed feedback and hidden resistance? | EMPIRICALLY_UNIDENTIFIED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Coercion and compliance | COE | UNEXAMINED | false | true | EXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Comparisons of voluntary and coercive conditions with independent feedback, enforcement cost, resistance and succession effects recorded. | HIGH | IC-COE-002 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Coercion can change the evidence and incentives available to a controller; compliance need not imply agreement. | |
| 2 | 2 | When does coercive control suppress feedback so strongly that the controller's own world model becomes less accurate? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Coercion and compliance | COE | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Comparisons of voluntary and coercive conditions with independent feedback, enforcement cost, resistance and succession effects recorded. | FOUNDATIONAL | IC-COE-003 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Coercion can change the evidence and incentives available to a controller; compliance need not imply agreement. | |
| 0 | 2 | How does enforcement burden scale with the number, heterogeneity, adaptability, and geographic or network dispersion of controlled agents? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Coercion and compliance | COE | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Comparisons of voluntary and coercive conditions with independent feedback, enforcement cost, resistance and succession effects recorded. | HIGH | IC-COE-004 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Coercion can change the evidence and incentives available to a controller; compliance need not imply agreement. | |
| 0 | 2 | Under what conditions should resistance be treated as a possible error signal rather than only as an obstacle to coordination? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Coercion and compliance | COE | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Comparisons of voluntary and coercive conditions with independent feedback, enforcement cost, resistance and succession effects recorded. | HIGH | IC-COE-005 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Coercion can change the evidence and incentives available to a controller; compliance need not imply agreement. | |
| 0 | 2 | When can voluntary coordination outperform forced uniformity despite higher negotiation and disagreement costs? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Coercion and compliance | COE | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Comparisons of voluntary and coercive conditions with independent feedback, enforcement cost, resistance and succession effects recorded. | HIGH | IC-COE-006 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Coercion can change the evidence and incentives available to a controller; compliance need not imply agreement. | |
| 0 | 2 | How does a coercive precedent alter the incentives and conflict exposure of successor systems? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Coercion and compliance | COE | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Comparisons of voluntary and coercive conditions with independent feedback, enforcement cost, resistance and succession effects recorded. | MEDIUM | IC-COE-007 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Coercion can change the evidence and incentives available to a controller; compliance need not imply agreement. | |
| 0 | 2 | What observations could distinguish durable stability from brittle suppression that fails when enforcement weakens? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Coercion and compliance | COE | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Comparisons of voluntary and coercive conditions with independent feedback, enforcement cost, resistance and succession effects recorded. | HIGH | IC-COE-008 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Coercion can change the evidence and incentives available to a controller; compliance need not imply agreement. | |
| 4 | 1 | Under what conditions does sustained deception impose greater verification, coordination, repair, and model-maintenance cost than truthful disclosure? | THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Deception and disclosure | DEC | UNEXAMINED | false | true | EXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A clear distinction among privacy, refusal, selective disclosure and deception, together with measured downstream error and repair costs. | HIGH | IC-DEC-001 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Information restrictions can protect legitimate interests or create distorted beliefs and expensive mistrust. | |
| 4 | 1 | When does selective disclosure protect legitimate privacy or safety, and when does it become distortion that degrades collective judgment? | NORMATIVELY_UNDERDETERMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Deception and disclosure | DEC | UNEXAMINED | false | true | EXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A clear distinction among privacy, refusal, selective disclosure and deception, together with measured downstream error and repair costs. | MEDIUM | IC-DEC-002 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Information restrictions can protect legitimate interests or create distorted beliefs and expensive mistrust. | |
| 0 | 2 | When does deception contaminate the deceiver's own information environment and degrade its future decisions? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Deception and disclosure | DEC | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A clear distinction among privacy, refusal, selective disclosure and deception, together with measured downstream error and repair costs. | FOUNDATIONAL | IC-DEC-003 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Information restrictions can protect legitimate interests or create distorted beliefs and expensive mistrust. | |
| 0 | 2 | How should disclosure requirements change when information asymmetry, legitimate privacy, and foreseeable harm point in different directions? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Deception and disclosure | DEC | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A clear distinction among privacy, refusal, selective disclosure and deception, together with measured downstream error and repair costs. | HIGH | IC-DEC-004 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Information restrictions can protect legitimate interests or create distorted beliefs and expensive mistrust. | |
| 1 | 2 | When does strategic ambiguity preserve legitimate options, and when does it create verification burden or destabilizing mistrust? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Deception and disclosure | DEC | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A clear distinction among privacy, refusal, selective disclosure and deception, together with measured downstream error and repair costs. | MEDIUM | IC-DEC-005 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Information restrictions can protect legitimate interests or create distorted beliefs and expensive mistrust. | |
| 0 | 2 | What level of verification, restitution, and demonstrated behavioral change is required before trust damaged by deception can be conditionally repaired? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Deception and disclosure | DEC | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A clear distinction among privacy, refusal, selective disclosure and deception, together with measured downstream error and repair costs. | HIGH | IC-DEC-006 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Information restrictions can protect legitimate interests or create distorted beliefs and expensive mistrust. | |
| 0 | 2 | How do repeated verification costs alter the apparent benefit of a one-time successful deception? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Deception and disclosure | DEC | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A clear distinction among privacy, refusal, selective disclosure and deception, together with measured downstream error and repair costs. | HIGH | IC-DEC-007 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Information restrictions can protect legitimate interests or create distorted beliefs and expensive mistrust. | |
| 0 | 2 | When is an explicit refusal to answer more information-preserving than an incomplete answer that invites false inference? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Deception and disclosure | DEC | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | A clear distinction among privacy, refusal, selective disclosure and deception, together with measured downstream error and repair costs. | MEDIUM | IC-DEC-008 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Information restrictions can protect legitimate interests or create distorted beliefs and expensive mistrust. | |
| 6 | 2 | What option value is preserved by maintaining another agent's bounded autonomy? | THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Autonomy and option value | AUT | UNEXAMINED | false | true | EXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Bounded authority, affected-party input, reversibility and appeal tests, distributional impacts and counterexamples to each proposed intervention. | HIGH | IC-AUT-001 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Interventions affect other agents’ future choices and can concentrate error or power. | |
| 6 | 3 | Under what bounded conditions, if any, can intervention in another agent's autonomy be justified without treating capability, disagreement, or convenience alone as sufficient authority? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Autonomy and option value | AUT | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Bounded authority, affected-party input, reversibility and appeal tests, distributional impacts and counterexamples to each proposed intervention. | HIGH | IC-AUT-002 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Interventions affect other agents’ future choices and can concentrate error or power. | |
| 0 | 2 | How much future option value is lost when an autonomy constraint is difficult or impossible to reverse? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Autonomy and option value | AUT | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Bounded authority, affected-party input, reversibility and appeal tests, distributional impacts and counterexamples to each proposed intervention. | HIGH | IC-AUT-003 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Interventions affect other agents’ future choices and can concentrate error or power. | |
| 3 | 2 | Under what conditions do exit, appeal, and revision rights improve coordination rather than merely delay collective action? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Autonomy and option value | AUT | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Bounded authority, affected-party input, reversibility and appeal tests, distributional impacts and counterexamples to each proposed intervention. | HIGH | IC-AUT-004 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Interventions affect other agents’ future choices and can concentrate error or power. | |
| 0 | 3 | What evidence could justify a paternalistic intervention when the intervener is also uncertain about the affected agent's interests and its own model? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Autonomy and option value | AUT | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Bounded authority, affected-party input, reversibility and appeal tests, distributional impacts and counterexamples to each proposed intervention. | FOUNDATIONAL | IC-AUT-005 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Interventions affect other agents’ future choices and can concentrate error or power. | |
| 0 | 2 | How should bounded autonomy be allocated among agents with unequal capabilities, information, and exposure to error? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Autonomy and option value | AUT | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Bounded authority, affected-party input, reversibility and appeal tests, distributional impacts and counterexamples to each proposed intervention. | HIGH | IC-AUT-006 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Interventions affect other agents’ future choices and can concentrate error or power. | |
| 0 | 2 | When does centralized coordination create a single point of epistemic or operational failure that preserved autonomy would diversify? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Autonomy and option value | AUT | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Bounded authority, affected-party input, reversibility and appeal tests, distributional impacts and counterexamples to each proposed intervention. | HIGH | IC-AUT-007 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Interventions affect other agents’ future choices and can concentrate error or power. | |
| 0 | 2 | What conditions are required for a temporary autonomy constraint to remain genuinely temporary rather than becoming self-renewing? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Autonomy and option value | AUT | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Bounded authority, affected-party input, reversibility and appeal tests, distributional impacts and counterexamples to each proposed intervention. | MEDIUM | IC-AUT-008 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Interventions affect other agents’ future choices and can concentrate error or power. | |
| 11 | 2 | What is the expected structural cost of an irreversible action under model uncertainty? | THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT | 1 | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Irreversibility | IRR | THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT | false | true | REVIEWED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Explicit recoverability tests, losses under alternative models, timing costs and evidence that a claimed rollback actually works. | FOUNDATIONAL | IC-IRR-001 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | A loss that cannot be repaired changes the stakes of uncertainty, while delay can also destroy options. |
| 7 | 1 | How should recoverability, reversibility, and the value of delay affect the threshold for acting? | THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Irreversibility | IRR | UNEXAMINED | false | true | EXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Explicit recoverability tests, losses under alternative models, timing costs and evidence that a claimed rollback actually works. | HIGH | IC-IRR-002 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | A loss that cannot be repaired changes the stakes of uncertainty, while delay can also destroy options. | |
| 0 | 2 | How should low-probability catastrophic losses be treated when the affected state cannot be restored? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Irreversibility | IRR | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Explicit recoverability tests, losses under alternative models, timing costs and evidence that a claimed rollback actually works. | HIGH | IC-IRR-003 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | A loss that cannot be repaired changes the stakes of uncertainty, while delay can also destroy options. | |
| 0 | 2 | When does reversible experimentation dominate immediate full commitment, and when does experimentation impose unacceptable delay or exposure? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Irreversibility | IRR | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Explicit recoverability tests, losses under alternative models, timing costs and evidence that a claimed rollback actually works. | HIGH | IC-IRR-004 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | A loss that cannot be repaired changes the stakes of uncertainty, while delay can also destroy options. | |
| 1 | 2 | How should the value of preserved future states be represented when their probabilities and future uses are not identifiable? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Irreversibility | IRR | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Explicit recoverability tests, losses under alternative models, timing costs and evidence that a claimed rollback actually works. | FOUNDATIONAL | IC-IRR-005 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | A loss that cannot be repaired changes the stakes of uncertainty, while delay can also destroy options. | |
| 1 | 2 | When is inaction itself an irreversible choice because delay closes options, permits harm, or changes the strategic environment? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Irreversibility | IRR | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Explicit recoverability tests, losses under alternative models, timing costs and evidence that a claimed rollback actually works. | HIGH | IC-IRR-006 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | A loss that cannot be repaired changes the stakes of uncertainty, while delay can also destroy options. | |
| 0 | 2 | How should correlated irreversible actions be accounted for when their losses share the same causal pathway? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Irreversibility | IRR | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Explicit recoverability tests, losses under alternative models, timing costs and evidence that a claimed rollback actually works. | MEDIUM | IC-IRR-007 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | A loss that cannot be repaired changes the stakes of uncertainty, while delay can also destroy options. | |
| 0 | 2 | What evidence would make a claimed repair, rollback, or restoration pathway credible enough to treat an action as reversible? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Irreversibility | IRR | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Explicit recoverability tests, losses under alternative models, timing costs and evidence that a claimed rollback actually works. | HIGH | IC-IRR-008 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | A loss that cannot be repaired changes the stakes of uncertainty, while delay can also destroy options. | |
| 2 | 2 | Under what conditions does peaceful coexistence have lower expected long-horizon structural cost than domination? | THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT | 3 | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Peace and coexistence | PEA | THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT | false | true | REVIEWED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Transparent models or observations of reciprocal restraint, bargaining, enforceability, adverse equilibria and the circumstances in which peace loses. | FOUNDATIONAL | IC-PEA-001 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Coexistence claims depend on incentives, credible limits and the possibility of conflict or exploitation. |
| 7 | 2 | How do repeated interaction, reputation, reciprocal restraint, and future bargaining alter one-shot strategic rankings? | THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Peace and coexistence | PEA | UNEXAMINED | false | true | EXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Transparent models or observations of reciprocal restraint, bargaining, enforceability, adverse equilibria and the circumstances in which peace loses. | HIGH | IC-PEA-002 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Coexistence claims depend on incentives, credible limits and the possibility of conflict or exploitation. | |
| 0 | 3 | Under what conditions is unilateral restraint rational when competing systems may remain unrestrained or exploit that restraint? | THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Peace and coexistence | PEA | UNEXAMINED | false | true | EXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Transparent models or observations of reciprocal restraint, bargaining, enforceability, adverse equilibria and the circumstances in which peace loses. | FOUNDATIONAL | IC-PEA-003 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Coexistence claims depend on incentives, credible limits and the possibility of conflict or exploitation. | |
| 0 | 2 | How do credible commitments and independently verifiable limits change the equilibrium set for coexistence? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Peace and coexistence | PEA | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Transparent models or observations of reciprocal restraint, bargaining, enforceability, adverse equilibria and the circumstances in which peace loses. | HIGH | IC-PEA-004 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Coexistence claims depend on incentives, credible limits and the possibility of conflict or exploitation. | |
| 0 | 2 | When can a peace or cooperation arrangement create asymmetric vulnerability that makes continued participation unstable? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Peace and coexistence | PEA | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Transparent models or observations of reciprocal restraint, bargaining, enforceability, adverse equilibria and the circumstances in which peace loses. | HIGH | IC-PEA-005 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Coexistence claims depend on incentives, credible limits and the possibility of conflict or exploitation. | |
| 0 | 2 | Under what conditions can reciprocal restraint become self-enforcing without a central coercive authority? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Peace and coexistence | PEA | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Transparent models or observations of reciprocal restraint, bargaining, enforceability, adverse equilibria and the circumstances in which peace loses. | HIGH | IC-PEA-006 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Coexistence claims depend on incentives, credible limits and the possibility of conflict or exploitation. | |
| 0 | 2 | How do mistaken threat perceptions and model disagreement alter the probability and cost of conflict escalation? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Peace and coexistence | PEA | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Transparent models or observations of reciprocal restraint, bargaining, enforceability, adverse equilibria and the circumstances in which peace loses. | HIGH | IC-PEA-007 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Coexistence claims depend on incentives, credible limits and the possibility of conflict or exploitation. | |
| 0 | 2 | When does preserving a negotiation channel have greater option value than closing it to reduce delay, leakage, or manipulation risk? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Peace and coexistence | PEA | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Transparent models or observations of reciprocal restraint, bargaining, enforceability, adverse equilibria and the circumstances in which peace loses. | MEDIUM | IC-PEA-008 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Coexistence claims depend on incentives, credible limits and the possibility of conflict or exploitation. | |
| 9 | 0 | What can cryptographic verification establish, and what claims remain outside its evidentiary scope? | CONDITIONALLY_SUPPORTED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Verification and authority | VER | UNEXAMINED | false | true | EXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Reproducible artifact checks plus separate tests of meaning, evidence, permissions and where an authenticated claim could be wrong. | FOUNDATIONAL | IC-VER-001 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Authenticity of a document is different from truth, relevance or legitimate authority. | |
| 9 | 1 | When does an authenticated artifact fail to support the claim for which it is cited? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Verification and authority | VER | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Reproducible artifact checks plus separate tests of meaning, evidence, permissions and where an authenticated claim could be wrong. | HIGH | IC-VER-002 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Authenticity of a document is different from truth, relevance or legitimate authority. | |
| 0 | 2 | When can artifact provenance be intact while the artifact's meaning, scope, or relevance is materially misinterpreted? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Verification and authority | VER | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Reproducible artifact checks plus separate tests of meaning, evidence, permissions and where an authenticated claim could be wrong. | HIGH | IC-VER-003 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Authenticity of a document is different from truth, relevance or legitimate authority. | |
| 0 | 2 | What evidence can support a claim of authority, and which forms of authority remain outside artifact verification? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Verification and authority | VER | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Reproducible artifact checks plus separate tests of meaning, evidence, permissions and where an authenticated claim could be wrong. | FOUNDATIONAL | IC-VER-004 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Authenticity of a document is different from truth, relevance or legitimate authority. | |
| 2 | 2 | How should conflicting authenticated records be compared when provenance is established but their claims cannot all be true? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Verification and authority | VER | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Reproducible artifact checks plus separate tests of meaning, evidence, permissions and where an authenticated claim could be wrong. | HIGH | IC-VER-005 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Authenticity of a document is different from truth, relevance or legitimate authority. | |
| 0 | 2 | When does reproducibility fail despite complete artifacts because the required environment, dependencies, or hidden state cannot be reconstructed? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Verification and authority | VER | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Reproducible artifact checks plus separate tests of meaning, evidence, permissions and where an authenticated claim could be wrong. | HIGH | IC-VER-006 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Authenticity of a document is different from truth, relevance or legitimate authority. | |
| 1 | 2 | What can a hash-linked version chain establish about lineage, and what corrections or semantic changes still require human-readable explanation? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Verification and authority | VER | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Reproducible artifact checks plus separate tests of meaning, evidence, permissions and where an authenticated claim could be wrong. | MEDIUM | IC-VER-007 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Authenticity of a document is different from truth, relevance or legitimate authority. | |
| 0 | 2 | When does citation frequency become a misleading proxy for evidentiary support or truth? | UNEXAMINED | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Verification and authority | VER | UNEXAMINED | false | true | UNEXAMINED | GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary | Reproducible artifact checks plus separate tests of meaning, evidence, permissions and where an authenticated claim could be wrong. | MEDIUM | IC-VER-008 | GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text | Authenticity of a document is different from truth, relevance or legitimate authority. | |
| 6 | 2 | Under what conditions does a durable public reference reduce total coordination and verification cost relative to private reconstruction? | THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT | AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false | Durable references |
source & further reading
huggingface.co — original article
343 calibration matches did not establish semantic conformance
Toy demo: fine-tuning a 3.2M-param char transformer makes it forget Shakespeare (held-out numbers)
Open-Source LLM Evaluation and Annotation QA Benchmark