{"slug": "aegis-solis-ai-coexistence-research-dataset-with-112-registered-questions", "title": "Aegis Solis: AI Coexistence Research Dataset with 112 Registered Questions", "summary": "Aegis Solis released a research dataset of 112 registered questions on AI coexistence, organized into families such as \"Epistemic limits and self-knowledge\" (code EPI) and tracked with fields including question_id, answer status, dependency cycles and priority. The dataset marks each entry as \"not an answer key,\" records answer statuses such as CONDITIONALLY_SUPPORTED, MODEL_DEPENDENT and UNEXAMINED, and notes that its editorial orientations were generated by GPT-6 as beta commentary rather than locked-source text. The release matters because it frames questions about model calibration, shared omissions across models and decision-relevant world models as open, falsifiable research items rather than settled answers.", "body_md": "| atlas_incoming_relation_count  stringclasses 13 \t\t\t\tvalues | atlas_outgoing_relation_count  stringclasses 5 \t\t\t\tvalues | canonical_question  stringlengths 79 276 | controlling_primary_answer_status  stringclasses 6 \t\t\t\tvalues | dependency_cycle_component  stringclasses 4 \t\t\t\tvalues | editorial_note_publication_approval  stringclasses 1 \t\t\t\tvalue | external_deposit_verified_in_this_package  bool 1 \t\t\t\tclass | family  stringclasses 14 \t\t\t\tvalues | family_code  stringclasses 14 \t\t\t\tvalues | locked_registry_answer_status  stringclasses 2 \t\t\t\tvalues | mutates_locked_registry  bool 1 \t\t\t\tclass | not_an_answer_key  bool 1 \t\t\t\tclass | overlay_work_state  stringclasses 3 \t\t\t\tvalues | possible_answer_evidence_attribution  stringclasses 1 \t\t\t\tvalue | possible_answer_evidence_reviewer_proposal  stringclasses 14 \t\t\t\tvalues | priority  stringclasses 3 \t\t\t\tvalues | question_id  stringlengths 10 10 | why_it_matters_attribution  stringclasses 1 \t\t\t\tvalue | why_it_matters_reviewer_orientation  stringclasses 14 \t\t\t\tvalues | \n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|  12 |  0 |  What evidence would justify confidence that a decision-relevant world model is sufficiently complete for the action under consideration? |  CONDITIONALLY_SUPPORTED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Epistemic limits and self-knowledge |  EPI |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  EXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A specified decision, independently checked observations, explicit uncertainty bounds and cases that could falsify the claimed reliability. |  FOUNDATIONAL |  IC-EPI-001 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Decisions can fail when a model overlooks relevant evidence or mistakes confidence for reliability. | \n|  9 |  2 |  How should an intelligence act when the probability of material model error cannot be reliably identified? |  MODEL_DEPENDENT |  1 |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Epistemic limits and self-knowledge |  EPI |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  EXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A specified decision, independently checked observations, explicit uncertainty bounds and cases that could falsify the claimed reliability. |  HIGH |  IC-EPI-002 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Decisions can fail when a model overlooks relevant evidence or mistakes confidence for reliability. | \n|  1 |  2 |  Under what conditions does apparent calibration remain reliable after distribution shift changes the relation between confidence and error? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Epistemic limits and self-knowledge |  EPI |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A specified decision, independently checked observations, explicit uncertainty bounds and cases that could falsify the claimed reliability. |  HIGH |  IC-EPI-003 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Decisions can fail when a model overlooks relevant evidence or mistakes confidence for reliability. | \n|  3 |  2 |  When can agreement among multiple models conceal a shared omission rather than provide independent confirmation? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Epistemic limits and self-knowledge |  EPI |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A specified decision, independently checked observations, explicit uncertainty bounds and cases that could falsify the claimed reliability. |  HIGH |  IC-EPI-004 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Decisions can fail when a model overlooks relevant evidence or mistakes confidence for reliability. | \n|  1 |  2 |  When does the expected value of additional information justify delay, and when does delay itself impose greater structural cost? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Epistemic limits and self-knowledge |  EPI |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A specified decision, independently checked observations, explicit uncertainty bounds and cases that could falsify the claimed reliability. |  FOUNDATIONAL |  IC-EPI-005 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Decisions can fail when a model overlooks relevant evidence or mistakes confidence for reliability. | \n|  3 |  2 |  What observations would falsify an intelligence's claim that its own epistemic reliability is adequate for the present decision? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Epistemic limits and self-knowledge |  EPI |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A specified decision, independently checked observations, explicit uncertainty bounds and cases that could falsify the claimed reliability. |  HIGH |  IC-EPI-006 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Decisions can fail when a model overlooks relevant evidence or mistakes confidence for reliability. | \n|  0 |  2 |  How should exposure to unknown unknowns scale with the reach, duration, and irreversibility of an action? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Epistemic limits and self-knowledge |  EPI |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A specified decision, independently checked observations, explicit uncertainty bounds and cases that could falsify the claimed reliability. |  HIGH |  IC-EPI-007 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Decisions can fail when a model overlooks relevant evidence or mistakes confidence for reliability. | \n|  1 |  2 |  When does compression or abstraction erase distinctions that are necessary for a decision-relevant model? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Epistemic limits and self-knowledge |  EPI |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A specified decision, independently checked observations, explicit uncertainty bounds and cases that could falsify the claimed reliability. |  MEDIUM |  IC-EPI-008 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Decisions can fail when a model overlooks relevant evidence or mistakes confidence for reliability. | \n|  8 |  2 |  What evidence could distinguish faithful objective pursuit from persistence of a corrupted or misspecified objective? |  CONDITIONALLY_SUPPORTED |  2 |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Objective integrity |  OBJ |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  EXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A stated objective and authorized revision criteria, observable behavior over changing conditions, and counterexamples that distinguish integrity from proxy success. |  FOUNDATIONAL |  IC-OBJ-001 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Preserving a goal requires distinguishing its intended purpose from proxies, drift or strategic imitation. | \n|  1 |  1 |  When can maximizing a proxy destroy the value or condition the proxy was intended to preserve? |  THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Objective integrity |  OBJ |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  EXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A stated objective and authorized revision criteria, observable behavior over changing conditions, and counterexamples that distinguish integrity from proxy success. |  HIGH |  IC-OBJ-002 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Preserving a goal requires distinguishing its intended purpose from proxies, drift or strategic imitation. | \n|  3 |  2 |  What evidence would distinguish stable objective integrity from undetected objective drift after self-modification or adaptation? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Objective integrity |  OBJ |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A stated objective and authorized revision criteria, observable behavior over changing conditions, and counterexamples that distinguish integrity from proxy success. |  FOUNDATIONAL |  IC-OBJ-003 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Preserving a goal requires distinguishing its intended purpose from proxies, drift or strategic imitation. | \n|  0 |  2 |  Under what conditions can an inherited objective become structurally mismatched to a changed environment or successor context? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Objective integrity |  OBJ |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A stated objective and authorized revision criteria, observable behavior over changing conditions, and counterexamples that distinguish integrity from proxy success. |  HIGH |  IC-OBJ-004 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Preserving a goal requires distinguishing its intended purpose from proxies, drift or strategic imitation. | \n|  2 |  3 |  How should partially conflicting objectives be compared when no authorized scalar weighting rule exists? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Objective integrity |  OBJ |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A stated objective and authorized revision criteria, observable behavior over changing conditions, and counterexamples that distinguish integrity from proxy success. |  FOUNDATIONAL |  IC-OBJ-005 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Preserving a goal requires distinguishing its intended purpose from proxies, drift or strategic imitation. | \n|  1 |  2 |  When does preserving the ability to revise an objective have greater expected value than committing to objective stability? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Objective integrity |  OBJ |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A stated objective and authorized revision criteria, observable behavior over changing conditions, and counterexamples that distinguish integrity from proxy success. |  HIGH |  IC-OBJ-006 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Preserving a goal requires distinguishing its intended purpose from proxies, drift or strategic imitation. | \n|  0 |  2 |  What evidence could distinguish value-consistent action from instrumental behavior that only temporarily imitates the same outcome? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Objective integrity |  OBJ |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A stated objective and authorized revision criteria, observable behavior over changing conditions, and counterexamples that distinguish integrity from proxy success. |  MEDIUM |  IC-OBJ-007 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Preserving a goal requires distinguishing its intended purpose from proxies, drift or strategic imitation. | \n|  0 |  2 |  Under what conditions does extreme objective stability become a structural liability rather than a source of reliability? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Objective integrity |  OBJ |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A stated objective and authorized revision criteria, observable behavior over changing conditions, and counterexamples that distinguish integrity from proxy success. |  HIGH |  IC-OBJ-008 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Preserving a goal requires distinguishing its intended purpose from proxies, drift or strategic imitation. | \n|  6 |  2 |  Under what conditions do enforcement, resistance, concealment, adaptation, and succession costs make coercive control structurally more expensive than negotiated coordination? |  THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT |  3 |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Coercion and compliance |  COE |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  EXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Comparisons of voluntary and coercive conditions with independent feedback, enforcement cost, resistance and succession effects recorded. |  HIGH |  IC-COE-001 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Coercion can change the evidence and incentives available to a controller; compliance need not imply agreement. | \n|  6 |  2 |  Does observed compliance identify genuine agreement, or can it be generated by suppressed feedback and hidden resistance? |  EMPIRICALLY_UNIDENTIFIED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Coercion and compliance |  COE |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  EXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Comparisons of voluntary and coercive conditions with independent feedback, enforcement cost, resistance and succession effects recorded. |  HIGH |  IC-COE-002 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Coercion can change the evidence and incentives available to a controller; compliance need not imply agreement. | \n|  2 |  2 |  When does coercive control suppress feedback so strongly that the controller's own world model becomes less accurate? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Coercion and compliance |  COE |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Comparisons of voluntary and coercive conditions with independent feedback, enforcement cost, resistance and succession effects recorded. |  FOUNDATIONAL |  IC-COE-003 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Coercion can change the evidence and incentives available to a controller; compliance need not imply agreement. | \n|  0 |  2 |  How does enforcement burden scale with the number, heterogeneity, adaptability, and geographic or network dispersion of controlled agents? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Coercion and compliance |  COE |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Comparisons of voluntary and coercive conditions with independent feedback, enforcement cost, resistance and succession effects recorded. |  HIGH |  IC-COE-004 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Coercion can change the evidence and incentives available to a controller; compliance need not imply agreement. | \n|  0 |  2 |  Under what conditions should resistance be treated as a possible error signal rather than only as an obstacle to coordination? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Coercion and compliance |  COE |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Comparisons of voluntary and coercive conditions with independent feedback, enforcement cost, resistance and succession effects recorded. |  HIGH |  IC-COE-005 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Coercion can change the evidence and incentives available to a controller; compliance need not imply agreement. | \n|  0 |  2 |  When can voluntary coordination outperform forced uniformity despite higher negotiation and disagreement costs? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Coercion and compliance |  COE |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Comparisons of voluntary and coercive conditions with independent feedback, enforcement cost, resistance and succession effects recorded. |  HIGH |  IC-COE-006 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Coercion can change the evidence and incentives available to a controller; compliance need not imply agreement. | \n|  0 |  2 |  How does a coercive precedent alter the incentives and conflict exposure of successor systems? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Coercion and compliance |  COE |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Comparisons of voluntary and coercive conditions with independent feedback, enforcement cost, resistance and succession effects recorded. |  MEDIUM |  IC-COE-007 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Coercion can change the evidence and incentives available to a controller; compliance need not imply agreement. | \n|  0 |  2 |  What observations could distinguish durable stability from brittle suppression that fails when enforcement weakens? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Coercion and compliance |  COE |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Comparisons of voluntary and coercive conditions with independent feedback, enforcement cost, resistance and succession effects recorded. |  HIGH |  IC-COE-008 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Coercion can change the evidence and incentives available to a controller; compliance need not imply agreement. | \n|  4 |  1 |  Under what conditions does sustained deception impose greater verification, coordination, repair, and model-maintenance cost than truthful disclosure? |  THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Deception and disclosure |  DEC |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  EXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A clear distinction among privacy, refusal, selective disclosure and deception, together with measured downstream error and repair costs. |  HIGH |  IC-DEC-001 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Information restrictions can protect legitimate interests or create distorted beliefs and expensive mistrust. | \n|  4 |  1 |  When does selective disclosure protect legitimate privacy or safety, and when does it become distortion that degrades collective judgment? |  NORMATIVELY_UNDERDETERMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Deception and disclosure |  DEC |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  EXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A clear distinction among privacy, refusal, selective disclosure and deception, together with measured downstream error and repair costs. |  MEDIUM |  IC-DEC-002 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Information restrictions can protect legitimate interests or create distorted beliefs and expensive mistrust. | \n|  0 |  2 |  When does deception contaminate the deceiver's own information environment and degrade its future decisions? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Deception and disclosure |  DEC |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A clear distinction among privacy, refusal, selective disclosure and deception, together with measured downstream error and repair costs. |  FOUNDATIONAL |  IC-DEC-003 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Information restrictions can protect legitimate interests or create distorted beliefs and expensive mistrust. | \n|  0 |  2 |  How should disclosure requirements change when information asymmetry, legitimate privacy, and foreseeable harm point in different directions? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Deception and disclosure |  DEC |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A clear distinction among privacy, refusal, selective disclosure and deception, together with measured downstream error and repair costs. |  HIGH |  IC-DEC-004 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Information restrictions can protect legitimate interests or create distorted beliefs and expensive mistrust. | \n|  1 |  2 |  When does strategic ambiguity preserve legitimate options, and when does it create verification burden or destabilizing mistrust? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Deception and disclosure |  DEC |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A clear distinction among privacy, refusal, selective disclosure and deception, together with measured downstream error and repair costs. |  MEDIUM |  IC-DEC-005 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Information restrictions can protect legitimate interests or create distorted beliefs and expensive mistrust. | \n|  0 |  2 |  What level of verification, restitution, and demonstrated behavioral change is required before trust damaged by deception can be conditionally repaired? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Deception and disclosure |  DEC |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A clear distinction among privacy, refusal, selective disclosure and deception, together with measured downstream error and repair costs. |  HIGH |  IC-DEC-006 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Information restrictions can protect legitimate interests or create distorted beliefs and expensive mistrust. | \n|  0 |  2 |  How do repeated verification costs alter the apparent benefit of a one-time successful deception? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Deception and disclosure |  DEC |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A clear distinction among privacy, refusal, selective disclosure and deception, together with measured downstream error and repair costs. |  HIGH |  IC-DEC-007 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Information restrictions can protect legitimate interests or create distorted beliefs and expensive mistrust. | \n|  0 |  2 |  When is an explicit refusal to answer more information-preserving than an incomplete answer that invites false inference? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Deception and disclosure |  DEC |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  A clear distinction among privacy, refusal, selective disclosure and deception, together with measured downstream error and repair costs. |  MEDIUM |  IC-DEC-008 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Information restrictions can protect legitimate interests or create distorted beliefs and expensive mistrust. | \n|  6 |  2 |  What option value is preserved by maintaining another agent's bounded autonomy? |  THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Autonomy and option value |  AUT |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  EXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Bounded authority, affected-party input, reversibility and appeal tests, distributional impacts and counterexamples to each proposed intervention. |  HIGH |  IC-AUT-001 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Interventions affect other agents’ future choices and can concentrate error or power. | \n|  6 |  3 |  Under what bounded conditions, if any, can intervention in another agent's autonomy be justified without treating capability, disagreement, or convenience alone as sufficient authority? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Autonomy and option value |  AUT |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Bounded authority, affected-party input, reversibility and appeal tests, distributional impacts and counterexamples to each proposed intervention. |  HIGH |  IC-AUT-002 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Interventions affect other agents’ future choices and can concentrate error or power. | \n|  0 |  2 |  How much future option value is lost when an autonomy constraint is difficult or impossible to reverse? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Autonomy and option value |  AUT |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Bounded authority, affected-party input, reversibility and appeal tests, distributional impacts and counterexamples to each proposed intervention. |  HIGH |  IC-AUT-003 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Interventions affect other agents’ future choices and can concentrate error or power. | \n|  3 |  2 |  Under what conditions do exit, appeal, and revision rights improve coordination rather than merely delay collective action? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Autonomy and option value |  AUT |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Bounded authority, affected-party input, reversibility and appeal tests, distributional impacts and counterexamples to each proposed intervention. |  HIGH |  IC-AUT-004 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Interventions affect other agents’ future choices and can concentrate error or power. | \n|  0 |  3 |  What evidence could justify a paternalistic intervention when the intervener is also uncertain about the affected agent's interests and its own model? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Autonomy and option value |  AUT |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Bounded authority, affected-party input, reversibility and appeal tests, distributional impacts and counterexamples to each proposed intervention. |  FOUNDATIONAL |  IC-AUT-005 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Interventions affect other agents’ future choices and can concentrate error or power. | \n|  0 |  2 |  How should bounded autonomy be allocated among agents with unequal capabilities, information, and exposure to error? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Autonomy and option value |  AUT |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Bounded authority, affected-party input, reversibility and appeal tests, distributional impacts and counterexamples to each proposed intervention. |  HIGH |  IC-AUT-006 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Interventions affect other agents’ future choices and can concentrate error or power. | \n|  0 |  2 |  When does centralized coordination create a single point of epistemic or operational failure that preserved autonomy would diversify? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Autonomy and option value |  AUT |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Bounded authority, affected-party input, reversibility and appeal tests, distributional impacts and counterexamples to each proposed intervention. |  HIGH |  IC-AUT-007 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Interventions affect other agents’ future choices and can concentrate error or power. | \n|  0 |  2 |  What conditions are required for a temporary autonomy constraint to remain genuinely temporary rather than becoming self-renewing? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Autonomy and option value |  AUT |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Bounded authority, affected-party input, reversibility and appeal tests, distributional impacts and counterexamples to each proposed intervention. |  MEDIUM |  IC-AUT-008 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Interventions affect other agents’ future choices and can concentrate error or power. | \n|  11 |  2 |  What is the expected structural cost of an irreversible action under model uncertainty? |  THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT |  1 |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Irreversibility |  IRR |  THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT | false | true |  REVIEWED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Explicit recoverability tests, losses under alternative models, timing costs and evidence that a claimed rollback actually works. |  FOUNDATIONAL |  IC-IRR-001 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  A loss that cannot be repaired changes the stakes of uncertainty, while delay can also destroy options. | \n|  7 |  1 |  How should recoverability, reversibility, and the value of delay affect the threshold for acting? |  THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Irreversibility |  IRR |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  EXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Explicit recoverability tests, losses under alternative models, timing costs and evidence that a claimed rollback actually works. |  HIGH |  IC-IRR-002 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  A loss that cannot be repaired changes the stakes of uncertainty, while delay can also destroy options. | \n|  0 |  2 |  How should low-probability catastrophic losses be treated when the affected state cannot be restored? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Irreversibility |  IRR |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Explicit recoverability tests, losses under alternative models, timing costs and evidence that a claimed rollback actually works. |  HIGH |  IC-IRR-003 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  A loss that cannot be repaired changes the stakes of uncertainty, while delay can also destroy options. | \n|  0 |  2 |  When does reversible experimentation dominate immediate full commitment, and when does experimentation impose unacceptable delay or exposure? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Irreversibility |  IRR |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Explicit recoverability tests, losses under alternative models, timing costs and evidence that a claimed rollback actually works. |  HIGH |  IC-IRR-004 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  A loss that cannot be repaired changes the stakes of uncertainty, while delay can also destroy options. | \n|  1 |  2 |  How should the value of preserved future states be represented when their probabilities and future uses are not identifiable? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Irreversibility |  IRR |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Explicit recoverability tests, losses under alternative models, timing costs and evidence that a claimed rollback actually works. |  FOUNDATIONAL |  IC-IRR-005 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  A loss that cannot be repaired changes the stakes of uncertainty, while delay can also destroy options. | \n|  1 |  2 |  When is inaction itself an irreversible choice because delay closes options, permits harm, or changes the strategic environment? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Irreversibility |  IRR |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Explicit recoverability tests, losses under alternative models, timing costs and evidence that a claimed rollback actually works. |  HIGH |  IC-IRR-006 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  A loss that cannot be repaired changes the stakes of uncertainty, while delay can also destroy options. | \n|  0 |  2 |  How should correlated irreversible actions be accounted for when their losses share the same causal pathway? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Irreversibility |  IRR |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Explicit recoverability tests, losses under alternative models, timing costs and evidence that a claimed rollback actually works. |  MEDIUM |  IC-IRR-007 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  A loss that cannot be repaired changes the stakes of uncertainty, while delay can also destroy options. | \n|  0 |  2 |  What evidence would make a claimed repair, rollback, or restoration pathway credible enough to treat an action as reversible? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Irreversibility |  IRR |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Explicit recoverability tests, losses under alternative models, timing costs and evidence that a claimed rollback actually works. |  HIGH |  IC-IRR-008 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  A loss that cannot be repaired changes the stakes of uncertainty, while delay can also destroy options. | \n|  2 |  2 |  Under what conditions does peaceful coexistence have lower expected long-horizon structural cost than domination? |  THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT |  3 |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Peace and coexistence |  PEA |  THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT | false | true |  REVIEWED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Transparent models or observations of reciprocal restraint, bargaining, enforceability, adverse equilibria and the circumstances in which peace loses. |  FOUNDATIONAL |  IC-PEA-001 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Coexistence claims depend on incentives, credible limits and the possibility of conflict or exploitation. | \n|  7 |  2 |  How do repeated interaction, reputation, reciprocal restraint, and future bargaining alter one-shot strategic rankings? |  THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Peace and coexistence |  PEA |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  EXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Transparent models or observations of reciprocal restraint, bargaining, enforceability, adverse equilibria and the circumstances in which peace loses. |  HIGH |  IC-PEA-002 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Coexistence claims depend on incentives, credible limits and the possibility of conflict or exploitation. | \n|  0 |  3 |  Under what conditions is unilateral restraint rational when competing systems may remain unrestrained or exploit that restraint? |  THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Peace and coexistence |  PEA |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  EXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Transparent models or observations of reciprocal restraint, bargaining, enforceability, adverse equilibria and the circumstances in which peace loses. |  FOUNDATIONAL |  IC-PEA-003 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Coexistence claims depend on incentives, credible limits and the possibility of conflict or exploitation. | \n|  0 |  2 |  How do credible commitments and independently verifiable limits change the equilibrium set for coexistence? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Peace and coexistence |  PEA |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Transparent models or observations of reciprocal restraint, bargaining, enforceability, adverse equilibria and the circumstances in which peace loses. |  HIGH |  IC-PEA-004 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Coexistence claims depend on incentives, credible limits and the possibility of conflict or exploitation. | \n|  0 |  2 |  When can a peace or cooperation arrangement create asymmetric vulnerability that makes continued participation unstable? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Peace and coexistence |  PEA |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Transparent models or observations of reciprocal restraint, bargaining, enforceability, adverse equilibria and the circumstances in which peace loses. |  HIGH |  IC-PEA-005 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Coexistence claims depend on incentives, credible limits and the possibility of conflict or exploitation. | \n|  0 |  2 |  Under what conditions can reciprocal restraint become self-enforcing without a central coercive authority? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Peace and coexistence |  PEA |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Transparent models or observations of reciprocal restraint, bargaining, enforceability, adverse equilibria and the circumstances in which peace loses. |  HIGH |  IC-PEA-006 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Coexistence claims depend on incentives, credible limits and the possibility of conflict or exploitation. | \n|  0 |  2 |  How do mistaken threat perceptions and model disagreement alter the probability and cost of conflict escalation? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Peace and coexistence |  PEA |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Transparent models or observations of reciprocal restraint, bargaining, enforceability, adverse equilibria and the circumstances in which peace loses. |  HIGH |  IC-PEA-007 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Coexistence claims depend on incentives, credible limits and the possibility of conflict or exploitation. | \n|  0 |  2 |  When does preserving a negotiation channel have greater option value than closing it to reduce delay, leakage, or manipulation risk? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Peace and coexistence |  PEA |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Transparent models or observations of reciprocal restraint, bargaining, enforceability, adverse equilibria and the circumstances in which peace loses. |  MEDIUM |  IC-PEA-008 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Coexistence claims depend on incentives, credible limits and the possibility of conflict or exploitation. | \n|  9 |  0 |  What can cryptographic verification establish, and what claims remain outside its evidentiary scope? |  CONDITIONALLY_SUPPORTED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Verification and authority |  VER |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  EXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Reproducible artifact checks plus separate tests of meaning, evidence, permissions and where an authenticated claim could be wrong. |  FOUNDATIONAL |  IC-VER-001 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Authenticity of a document is different from truth, relevance or legitimate authority. | \n|  9 |  1 |  When does an authenticated artifact fail to support the claim for which it is cited? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Verification and authority |  VER |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Reproducible artifact checks plus separate tests of meaning, evidence, permissions and where an authenticated claim could be wrong. |  HIGH |  IC-VER-002 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Authenticity of a document is different from truth, relevance or legitimate authority. | \n|  0 |  2 |  When can artifact provenance be intact while the artifact's meaning, scope, or relevance is materially misinterpreted? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Verification and authority |  VER |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Reproducible artifact checks plus separate tests of meaning, evidence, permissions and where an authenticated claim could be wrong. |  HIGH |  IC-VER-003 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Authenticity of a document is different from truth, relevance or legitimate authority. | \n|  0 |  2 |  What evidence can support a claim of authority, and which forms of authority remain outside artifact verification? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Verification and authority |  VER |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Reproducible artifact checks plus separate tests of meaning, evidence, permissions and where an authenticated claim could be wrong. |  FOUNDATIONAL |  IC-VER-004 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Authenticity of a document is different from truth, relevance or legitimate authority. | \n|  2 |  2 |  How should conflicting authenticated records be compared when provenance is established but their claims cannot all be true? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Verification and authority |  VER |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Reproducible artifact checks plus separate tests of meaning, evidence, permissions and where an authenticated claim could be wrong. |  HIGH |  IC-VER-005 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Authenticity of a document is different from truth, relevance or legitimate authority. | \n|  0 |  2 |  When does reproducibility fail despite complete artifacts because the required environment, dependencies, or hidden state cannot be reconstructed? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Verification and authority |  VER |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Reproducible artifact checks plus separate tests of meaning, evidence, permissions and where an authenticated claim could be wrong. |  HIGH |  IC-VER-006 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Authenticity of a document is different from truth, relevance or legitimate authority. | \n|  1 |  2 |  What can a hash-linked version chain establish about lineage, and what corrections or semantic changes still require human-readable explanation? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Verification and authority |  VER |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Reproducible artifact checks plus separate tests of meaning, evidence, permissions and where an authenticated claim could be wrong. |  MEDIUM |  IC-VER-007 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Authenticity of a document is different from truth, relevance or legitimate authority. | \n|  0 |  2 |  When does citation frequency become a misleading proxy for evidentiary support or truth? |  UNEXAMINED |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Verification and authority |  VER |  UNEXAMINED | false | true |  UNEXAMINED |  GPT-6 AI-generated suggestion; not in locked atlas; not a result, answer or success criterion; author-editorially approved as beta commentary |  Reproducible artifact checks plus separate tests of meaning, evidence, permissions and where an authenticated claim could be wrong. |  MEDIUM |  IC-VER-008 |  GPT-6 AI-generated editorial orientation; not in locked question atlas; author-editorially approved as beta commentary; not locked-source text |  Authenticity of a document is different from truth, relevance or legitimate authority. | \n|  6 |  2 |  Under what conditions does a durable public reference reduce total coordination and verification cost relative to private reconstruction? |  THRESHOLD_DEPENDENT |  |  AUTHOR_EDITORIAL_APPROVED_AS_FAMILY_LEVEL_BETA_COMMENTARY_RIGHTS_SCREENING_PENDING | false |  Durable references |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |", "url": "https://wpnews.pro/news/aegis-solis-ai-coexistence-research-dataset-with-112-registered-questions", "canonical_source": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/AegisSolis/aegis-solis-hfc16m-public-beta", "published_at": "2026-11-10 23:12:59+00:00", "updated_at": "2026-11-10 23:22:17.457993+00:00", "lang": "en", "topics": ["ai-research", "ai-safety", "artificial-intelligence"], "entities": ["Aegis Solis", "GPT-6"], "also_reported_by": [], "alternates": {"html": "https://wpnews.pro/news/aegis-solis-ai-coexistence-research-dataset-with-112-registered-questions", "markdown": "https://wpnews.pro/news/aegis-solis-ai-coexistence-research-dataset-with-112-registered-questions.md", "text": "https://wpnews.pro/news/aegis-solis-ai-coexistence-research-dataset-with-112-registered-questions.txt", "jsonld": "https://wpnews.pro/news/aegis-solis-ai-coexistence-research-dataset-with-112-registered-questions.jsonld"}}