You shouldn't review coding agents output without AI itself

A developer built Magic Diff, an open-source tool that uses AI to summarize code changes across committed or uncommitted files, aiming to improve the review of AI-generated code. Written in Go/Wails/React, the tool is available on GitHub and integrates with coding agents like Claude Code and Codex.

Raw human-in-the-loop review is overrated. AI has already proven useful enough that I started wondering: why are we still reviewing AI-generated code manually when AI itself can help review it? When using Claude Code or Codex , I’d first rely on specialized subagents for deeper reviews. But for a quick overview of what actually changed, opening a basic Git diff viewer wasn’t enough for me. So I built Magic Diff , a tool that uses AI to summarize changes across one or more committed or uncommitted files. It’s open source, written in Go/Wails/React. Repository: https://github.com/gsscoder/magik-diff https://github.com/gsscoder/magik-diff