Why My Apple Watch Site Gets More Traffic From AI Than Google

A developer behind watchwalls.pro, an Apple Watch wallpaper site, reports that ChatGPT drove more traffic than Google Search in September 2026, with AI sessions growing from 42 to 96 in a month after adding an llms.txt file and other AI-oriented optimizations. The developer says Google has indexed only 23 of the site's 300+ pages after six months, while AI assistants cite new pages within days.

My site about Apple Watch wallpapers gets more visitors from ChatGPT than from Google Search. Here's why that matters and what I'm doing about it. In September 2026, my site watchwalls.pro received: ChatGPT is my 1 real traffic source. Google, with its 90%+ market share, sends almost nothing. ChatGPT doesn't use PageRank. It cites sources that: These are the same things that make content useful for humans. The difference is that ChatGPT rewards them immediately, while Google takes months to trust a new domain. After realising AI was my main traffic source, I optimised for it: llms.txt at the site root The result: AI traffic grew from 42 to 96 sessions in one month. Google has indexed only 23 of my 300+ pages after 6 months. The site ranks well on DuckDuckGo and Bing for the same content. This isn't a content quality issue — it's a domain trust issue that takes time to build. Meanwhile, Apple Watch wallpaper guides on WatchWalls https://watchwalls.pro/apple-watch-wallpaper-ideas/ get cited by AI assistants within days of publication, no domain authority required. If you're building a new content site in 2026: The web is no longer Google-or-nothing. Build for the reader, structure for AI, and let Google catch up when it's ready.