Why I Use Uruky, a Private Search Engine

A user review praises Uruky, a private search engine, for its simple interface, lack of AI, and Spanish language support, but criticizes its comparisons with other engines, vague privacy terms, and missing date/time in search results.

@brn https://discuss.privacyguides.net/u/brn Very well. Here’s a brief analysis: What I liked: - Basic interface, straight to the point. No overwhelming UI resembling sci-fi movies or AAA games, neither professional nor flashy colors. - Well-organized menus in settings. - Useful FAQ section for those looking for relevant info, but the phrase “Can I pay with cash for 100% anonymity?” is extremely exaggerated—I’d recommend updating it to be more honest. 100% anonymity doesn’t exist. - Terms of service and privacy policy are standard, but they hurt the quality and coherence of the service with the following words: “You are solely responsible for your use of the service.” For example: If the CEO gets bribed and does shady work behind the scenes, the service is responsible—not the legitimate users they wouldn’t know what’s hidden unless they detect suspicious activity . A correction is recommended. - No AI. That’s a step forward in not being infected by what every other company is doing—it’s something I like and I hope they never integrate it. - Available in my language, Spanish. Easy to understand. What I didn’t like: - On the main page there are two things: The phrase that reads along with its context: “What do people say about Uruky?” → it breaks the quality of the interface. I recommend integrating it into the rest of the menus between “Why Uruky” and “Threat models.” Where it says “Company, Information,” etc. → merge what’s currently floating around into collapsible submenus. This reduces the amount of scrolling on mobile devices. - Making comparisons with other engines significantly lowers the quality of the service, and I’ll explain why: being based in the EU or similar doesn’t automatically make a service high quality. I’m not accusing you of being malicious, but you should let the company’s actions speak for themselves. If you claim: “Search privately and without ads.” → let people find that out based on actions, not words. This is fundamental. If you make comparisons, it feels like I’m watching a “services” war and competition just for being based in the EU at minimum. What’s missing: - In search results, it would be great to integrate the date and time of a link if available. This is fundamental because it helps you know when something happened, what it is by reading the title , what it’s about topic info , issues spotting inconsistencies, duplication, or other basic problems , and quality? whether it’s worth clicking based on visible info without opening the link . End. For now. Observation: I did this with a default test account provided by the website. There you go, free of charge.