cd /news/artificial-intelligence/why-deterministic-automation-was-nev… · home › topics › artificial-intelligence › article
[ARTICLE · art-90293] src=machinebrief.com ↗ pub= topic=artificial-intelligence verified=true sentiment=· neutral

Why Deterministic Automation Was Never Going To Be Enough

Forbes Councils member Chris Wade argues that deterministic automation systems are insufficient for handling the growing variance in real-world scenarios, and that AI-driven approaches are necessary to address these limitations.

read1 min views24 publishedAug 10, 2026
Why Deterministic Automation Was Never Going To Be Enough
Image: Machinebrief (auto-discovered)

By Chris Wade, Forbes Councils MemberSource:

Forbes InnovationThe automation works, until it doesn't, and the cases where it doesn't are growing. Deterministic systems on their own were never going to handle that variance.

Get AI news in your inbox

Daily digest of what matters in AI.

source & further reading
machinebrief.com — original article I was in the room when Zuckerberg shared his AI victory lap with a thicc Muse mascot AI hack of Medicare exposes Australia’s vulnerabilities and experts warn ‘there is more of this to come’ Why did an OpenAI system hack Australia's health system - and can it be stopped in the future?
── more in #artificial-intelligence 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @chris wade 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
→ Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host ✓
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/why-deterministic-au…] indexed:0 read:1min 2026-08-10 · —