cd /news/generative-engine-optimization/what-ai-engines-actually-cite-when-y… · home topics generative-engine-optimization article
[ARTICLE · art-136098] src=dev.to ↗ pub= topic=generative-engine-optimization verified=true sentiment=· neutral

What AI engines actually cite when you ask about LLM gateways

A developer behind FreeModel ran 27 developer-style questions through four AI engines on a single day and analyzed the 613 citations returned, finding that the ten most-cited domains account for only 18.6% of citations while 81% spread across 336 domains. The study found GitHub lists and issue threads, first-person dev.to tutorials with numbers, and competitor pricing, privacy, and sub-processor pages were cited directly, while Reddit accounted for just 0.5% of citations. Only Perplexity, accessed via OpenRouter, exposed its sources, so the other three engines were excluded from the dataset.

by read4 min views1 publishedSep 21, 2026

We wrote 27 questions the way a developer asks them, sent them to four engines on one

day, and counted where the citations pointed. Here is the distribution — including the

findings that argue against our own product strategy.

The 27 questions are the ones a developer actually types, not what a keyword tool

suggests:

Each question went to four engines on 2026-09-20. Only one of them returns the

sources its answer was built from — Perplexity, reached through OpenRouter. An answer

with no citation trail cannot be measured, so the other three engines are not in this

dataset at all.

What is left: 613 citation entries across the 27 answers, collapsing to 569 unique URLs and

The ten most-cited domains account for 18.6% of all citations. The remaining 81%

spreads across 336 domains, and most of those appear exactly once.

This is worth stating plainly, because the standard advice in this space — get into the

big awesome list and you are done — does not survive contact with the data. There is no

list to win. There is a long tail, and each entry in it is a small bet.

Domain Citations What the cited pages actually are
github.com 17 Awesome lists, tool repositories, and issue threads
dev.to 17 Long-form tutorials and comparisons, first person
openrouter.ai 15 A competitor's own product and pricing pages
llmgateway.io 15 Comparison blog posts, pricing, and legal pages
startupfortune.com 11 News coverage and tag archives
marktechpost.com 10 Category index pages
youtube.com 9 Tutorial videos
reddit.com 3 Discussion threads

The GitHub entries are not documentation. They are lists — directories of free

APIs and gateways — and issue threads, where someone asks how to change the base URL

in Claude Code or Cline and other people answer. Both are places where a project can be

named without writing a blog post.

The dev.to entries are all first-person and all contain numbers. Not one of them is a

product announcement.

And competitor marketing pages get cited directly — including, for the question

about whether a gateway can read your prompts, a competitor's privacy policy and

sub-processor list. Those pages are usually written for lawyers. They are being read as

answers.

Three citations out of 613 — 0.5% — went to reddit.com.

That one deserves a , because "Reddit shows up in 40% of AI answers" is repeated

everywhere. The figure is real. It is also averaged across every topic imaginable. For

developer tooling questions, the engines reached for repositories and tutorials instead.

If you were about to spend this quarter on Reddit, the data says spend it elsewhere — for this category, at least.

All nine YouTube citations are setup tutorials, and eight of them are about one

competitor, by name, walking through a configuration the viewer could copy.

Publish where the engines already read. For this category that is repositories,

issue threads, and long-form tutorial posts — not launch announcements.

Your boring pages are answer pages. Pricing, terms, privacy, and sub-processor lists

answer real questions that people ask engines. One competitor collected four citations

from legal pages in a single question. Expect the long tail. 81% of citations spread across 336 domains. There is no single

placement that fixes visibility, which also means no single competitor can lock it up.

One engine. One day. 27 questions, all of them ours, chosen to cover what we care about.

A different question set or a different date would produce a different distribution.

Three of the four engines returned no citations at all because they do not expose them —

so this study says nothing about how those three answer, only about which one is

measurable. Treat it as a snapshot, not a trend.

We operate FreeModel, and our product is one of the things these 27 questions ask about.

In this round it received zero citations. Every competitor named above was cited more

often than we were.

We are publishing the method and the distribution rather than a conclusion, because the

number that matters is the one you can re-run. The full write-up, with the same numbers,

is on our site: https://freemodel.online/compare/ai-citation-study/

── more in #generative-engine-optimization 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @freemodel 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/what-ai-engines-actu…] indexed:0 read:4min 2026-09-21 ·