A lot of frontend tooling discussions focus on speed. Faster startup. Faster HMR. Faster builds. Those things matter — but at scale, they aren’t where most of the cost comes from. The real problem shows up as work amnesia. Most build tools treat every run as a fresh start: dependency graphs are rediscovered transformations are repeated valid work is forgotten That behaviour was fine when frontend apps were small and isolated. In 2026, frontend applications are: long‑lived graph‑based shared across teams rebuilt continuously in CI At that point, forgetting becomes expensive. Build systems stop being scripts and start behaving like systems — whether we design them that way or not. The next step for frontend tooling isn’t just running faster. It’s remembering what’s already valid and reacting only to real change. That’s the problem space Ionify exists in. Not as another tool — but as a build intelligence engine that treats frontend builds as systems with memory. Curious how others here think about build tools once projects grow past “single app” scale.
What I Understood from Cracking the Coding Interview