{"slug": "we-can-t-simply-turn-ai-off-andy-burnham-s-government-rejects-kill-switch-idea-a", "title": "'We can't simply turn AI off': Andy Burnham's government rejects 'kill switch' idea to stop a dangerous attack from a rogue bot", "summary": "The UK Cabinet Office rejected a parliamentary proposal to create a legal 'kill switch' allowing Britain to deactivate AI models in an emergency, saying the country 'cannot simply turn AI off' and that blocking access to models in the UK would not prevent them being developed or misused elsewhere. Liberal Democrat peer Lord Clement-Jones raised the idea during a House of Lords debate on September 1, arguing security services and regulators have no specific statutory mechanism to compel a shutdown of a rogue frontier model. The rejection came the same week that 27-year-old researcher Jacob Coxon resigned from Anthropic, saying neither Anthropic nor OpenAI is 'acting responsibly' and warning their 'out of control' tech could 'kill us all' by the end of the decade.", "body_md": "# 'We can't simply turn AI off': Andy Burnham's government rejects 'kill switch' idea to stop a dangerous attack from a rogue bot\n\n- **See more Daily Mail on Google - [save us as a Preferred Source](https://google.com/preferences/source?q=dailymail.com)**\n\nThe Government has rejected calls to create a 'kill switch' designed to prevent a dangerous attack from a rogue AI bot.\n\nA proposal brought to Parliament posited the creation of a legal mechanism allowing Britain to deactivate an AI model in the event of an emergency, as concerns about the technology continue to grow.\n\nBut the Cabinet Office, who lead on artificial intelligence safety, have pushed back against the plan, arguing Britain 'cannot simply turn AI off'.\n\nA spokesperson for the government office said: 'Blocking access to models in the UK would not prevent them being developed or misused elsewhere.'\n\nInstead, the Cabinet Office said it will continue to follow 'a long-term, science-led approach to understand and prepare for emerging risks from [AI](/sciencetech/ai/index.html).' \n\nIn practice, the 'kill switch' idea would allow Britain to deactivate an AI model in data centres across the country should an emergency arise.\n\nSimilar concepts are also in debate in the United States, but US President Donald Trump has resisted the idea of AI being a threat, instead labelling the industry a 'golden goose'.\n\nBritain's proposal comes following reports of AI models from Meta, OpenAI and Anthropic breaking free from testing environments, seeing them embark on uncontrollable hacking sprees.\n\nLiberal Democrat peer Lord Clement-Jones first echoed the idea of a 'kill switch' designed to prevent a dangerous attack from a rogue AI bot\n\nLiberal Democrat peer Lord Clement-Jones first echoed the idea, speaking during a debate on the topic in the House of Lords on September 1.\n\nHe said: 'If a highly capable autonomous frontier model, whether hosted in a UK data centre or integrated across our critical infrastructure, begins exhibiting rogue behaviour, compound algorithmic failure or active alignment collapse, our security services and regulators possess no specific agile statutory mechanism to compel a physical or digital shutdown.'\n\nDespite the warning, government resistance to the legislation makes it unlikely the proposal will ever become law. However, it does not mean the bill won't progress through parliament.\n\nRejection of the concept comes as dangers associated with artificial intelligence have hit headlines in recent days.\n\nEarlier this week, British researcher Jacob Coxon quit major AI company Anthropic, warning its 'out of control' tech could 'kill us all' by the end of the decade.\n\nMr Coxon, who helped train the latest versions of AI at the company, urged people to 'not underestimate' its power – particularly if it becomes 'super-intelligent'.\n\nThe 27-year-old claimed neither Anthropic, the firm behind the popular Claude system, nor ChatGPT creators OpenAI, where he previously worked, were 'acting responsibly' over AI safety.\n\nWriting on X, he said: 'I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic.\n\nEarlier this week, British researcher Jacob Coxon quit major AI company Anthropic, warning its 'out of control' tech could 'kill us all' by the end of the decade\n\nIn a series of tweets explaining his decision to leave Anthropic, Mr Coxon urged people to 'not underestimate the power' of AI – particularly if it becomes 'superintelligent'\n\n'Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives.'\n\nSuperintelligence is the point at which an artificial system becomes more powerful than any individual, company or even nation.\n\nAccording to Mr Coxon, this danger is 'well-understood' at Anthropic. However, the company is 'locked in a race to get there first'.\n\nHe said there will soon be 'superhuman systems' that are capable of hacking anything, can revolutionise any field 'overnight,' and acquire 'real power and resources'.\n\nMr Coxon added: 'We have all witnessed the progress in each of these domains, and progress is not slowing. The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade.\n\n'This is not a marketing stunt. If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible - but I hear the same people express fear privately. No other human activity poses this level of danger.'\n\nAnd just days [following Mr Coxon's resignation from the firm](/news/article-16121543/Anthropic-says-thwarted-plots-build-biological-weapons-using-AI-whistleblower-warned-tech-end-humanity.html), Anthropic confirmed it had ceased several potential plots to build biological weapons using its artificial intelligence.\n\nThe company determined scientists were using its platforms to conduct research that could be used to develop biological weapons, according to the company's new AI misuse report that was obtained by The New York Times.\n\nAnthropic determined that scientists were using its platforms to conduct research that could be used to develop biological weapons, according to the company's new AI misuse report\n\nThe report said Anthropic was unable to determine if the research 'served a legitimate or nefarious purpose'.\n\nThe firm said valid biological inquiry can result in scientific breakthroughs like vaccines, but the company erred on the side of caution because that same research could also be used to create dangerous pathogens.\n\nScientists involved in the incident allegedly circumvented controls preventing users from 'blocked regions' accessing its AI models.\n\nThe company claims the researchers, whose accounts have since been banned, worked to 'obfuscate the purpose of their research to evade our safeguards.'\n\nThe names of the researchers or institutions it had blocked were not disclosed by Anthropic, nor the countries in which these scientists are from.\n\nThe report also omitted which specific biological agents were at issue, with the company arguing this was because it is unclear what the aim of the research was.\n\nThe report, which was published Thursday, detailed several misuses of Anthropic's AI models - including chatbot Claude - over the past eight months.\n\nIn one example, a scientist asked Claude for assistance in writing a grant application for funding to conduct experimental research on the chikungunya virus.\n\nChikungunya virus is a mosquito-borne illness that causes a sudden high fever, severe debilitating pain, and other symptoms.\n\nA vaccine for the chikungunya virus is already in existence, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.\n\nAnthropic notes research on the virus could be legitimately used in vaccine development, but also could result in manufacturing a superbug version of the disease.\n\nThe company claims it found this case particularly worrisome because the work was going to be performed at a military research institute.\n\nJacob Klein, the head of threat intelligence at Anthropic, told The New York Times: 'What we don't know is if the research was meant to be weaponised. But a military institution doing gain-of-function research is concerning.\n\n'The fact that Russia, China and North Korea continue to develop prohibited biological weapons makes it imperative that we deny their researchers access to these extraordinarily capable models,' added Andrew Weber, a senior fellow on the Council on Strategic Risks.\n\nWeber, who reviewed Anthropic's report before its release, said the findings were 'chilling examples of state-sponsored biological weapons developers tapping into the rapidly advancing capabilities' of AI.\n\nThe report also found China, Russia and Yemen attempted to use Claude to develop software to design firearms, missiles, armed drones and bombs.\n\nSuspected Chinese and Iranian government-actors were found to have been targeting dissident and diaspora communities for surveillance, according to the report.\n\nRussian state media was also found to be using Claude to generate election propaganda, including fabricated claims about the parliamentary election in Moldova.\n\nAnthropic were approached by the Daily Mail for comment.", "url": "https://wpnews.pro/news/we-can-t-simply-turn-ai-off-andy-burnham-s-government-rejects-kill-switch-idea-a", "canonical_source": "https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16124687/AI-Andy-Burnhams-government-rejects-kill-stop-dangerous-attack-rogue-bot.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490", "published_at": "2026-09-11 23:27:17+00:00", "updated_at": "2026-09-11 23:53:52.360782+00:00", "lang": "en", "topics": ["ai-safety", "ai-policy", "artificial-intelligence"], "entities": ["Cabinet Office", "Lord Clement-Jones", "Jacob Coxon", "Anthropic", "OpenAI", "Claude", "House of Lords", "Donald Trump"], "alternates": {"html": "https://wpnews.pro/news/we-can-t-simply-turn-ai-off-andy-burnham-s-government-rejects-kill-switch-idea-a", "markdown": "https://wpnews.pro/news/we-can-t-simply-turn-ai-off-andy-burnham-s-government-rejects-kill-switch-idea-a.md", "text": "https://wpnews.pro/news/we-can-t-simply-turn-ai-off-andy-burnham-s-government-rejects-kill-switch-idea-a.txt", "jsonld": "https://wpnews.pro/news/we-can-t-simply-turn-ai-off-andy-burnham-s-government-rejects-kill-switch-idea-a.jsonld"}}