cd /news/artificial-intelligence/using-large-language-models-for-rese… · home topics artificial-intelligence article
[ARTICLE · art-122561] src=github.com ↗ pub= topic=artificial-intelligence verified=true sentiment=· neutral

Using large language models for research in the natural sciences

A new guide by Danielle Loader, Jonathan Oppenheim, and Tobias J. Osborne describes workflows for using large language models in natural science research, emphasizing adversarial verification protocols and Lamport's structured proof format to improve and verify model output. The guide, titled 'train_your_slop_cannon_v1', spans 27 pages and is licensed under CC BY 4.0, aiming to help scientists diagnose common failure modes such as context rot, hyperfixation, and sycophancy.

read2 min views2 publishedSep 7, 2026
Using large language models for research in the natural sciences
Image: Michielbdejong (auto-discovered)

A short guide to using large language models for research in the natural sciences

Danielle , Jonathan Oppenheim, Tobias J. Osborne

Large Language Models are transforming mathematics and the physical sciences, allowing scientists to explore ideas quickly and raise their sights to grand challenges. But they also produce plausible but wrong text at industrial scale. Staying afloat in this torrent of slop requires scrutinising everything the model produces. We describe a number of workflows that improve and verify model output. These include using adversarial verification protocols, in tandem with Lamport's structured proof format. This exposes logical dependencies, and, by refining claims into sub-claims, spans a spectrum of rigour, from prose to formal verification.

Because an LLM performs best when its input only contains what its next step needs, we use wikis and notebooks that the model reads selectively. We try to avoid techniques which merely patch flaws in current models, instead aiming to amplify LLMs as they improve. We explain enough of the architecture so users can diagnose common failure modes such as context rot, hyperfixation, and sycophancy. This guide is intended for scientists whose experience of large language models is the chat window, which conceals many of the levers that can make LLMs more reliable. The goal is to make LLM output more open to inspection, without losing sight of AI's broader dangers.

File Description
train_your_slop_cannon_v1.tex LaTeX source (self-contained; bibliography is inline via thebibliography )
train_your_slop_cannon_v1.pdf Compiled PDF, 27 pages
claude-code-session.png Figure: a coding-agent session, included in Section 5
latexmk -pdf train_your_slop_cannon_v1.tex

Requires a TeX Live installation with amsmath, tcolorbox, tikz, listings, hyperref, dsfont, booktabs, enumitem, fancyhdr and geometry.

The manuscript is drafted on Overleaf; this repository is a snapshot of that source. The file was named structured-proofs.tex on Overleaf and is renamed here to match the title.

Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). See LICENSE.

── more in #artificial-intelligence 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @danielle loader 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/using-large-language…] indexed:0 read:2min 2026-09-07 ·