Photo: 三 点sky / Pexels
Scott Bessent frames the AI race with China as America's 'biggest risk,' with formal governance talks set for September
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent wants you to know what keeps him up at night. It’s not AI taking your job. It’s not Skynet. It’s Beijing.
Speaking at the Economic Club of New York on June 24, Bessent called China’s rapid progress in artificial intelligence the “biggest risk” facing the United States. While he noted the US currently leads “by a substantial amount,” his tone carried the urgency of someone watching a rearview mirror that’s getting crowded.
The geopolitical framing #
Bessent has positioned himself as a central figure in shaping both US AI policy and the economic relationship with China. By casting the AI competition in national security terms, he’s effectively arguing that dominance in frontier AI models is as strategically important as military superiority or energy independence.
He also raised the specter of intellectual property theft, warning that Chinese firms allegedly copying US AI models could trigger sanctions. Treasury controls the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), the agency that actually administers US sanctions. When the person who oversees that apparatus starts publicly floating the idea of using it against AI-related IP theft, companies on both sides of the Pacific tend to pay attention.
September talks loom large #
The backdrop for Bessent’s comments is an evolving diplomatic channel between Washington and Beijing on AI governance. Following the May 2026 summit between Presidents Trump and Xi Jinping, both sides agreed to formal bilateral discussions on AI. Those talks are scheduled to begin in September, timed to coincide with Xi’s planned visit to the US around September 24.
The agenda, at least as Bessent described it, will center on preventing advanced AI technologies from reaching non-state actors. It’s one of the rare areas where US and Chinese interests actually align, since neither government wants to see frontier AI capabilities floating around outside state control.
The Trump administration has consistently linked AI leadership to broader economic strategy, treating technological dominance as foundational to maintaining the dollar’s reserve status, attracting global capital, and ensuring that the rules governing AI deployment are written in Washington rather than Beijing.
What this means for markets and tech #
The explicit mention of potential sanctions against Chinese firms for AI-related IP theft introduces a new variable for investors to price in. Companies developing large language models and other frontier AI systems now face the possibility that their competitive landscape could be reshaped not just by technical innovation but by government enforcement actions.
For US-based AI firms, the administration’s posture could be a double-edged sword. On one hand, a government committed to maintaining American AI supremacy is likely to support favorable regulatory conditions, continued investment in research infrastructure, and aggressive protection of intellectual property. On the other hand, escalating tensions with China risk disrupting supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor space where manufacturing remains heavily concentrated in Asia. The September timeline creates a defined window for the governance discussions. Markets will likely spend the summer positioning around expectations for those talks, making every subsequent comment from Bessent, or his Chinese counterparts, a potential catalyst for sector-wide moves.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our