US, China Gear Up for Mid-September AI Safety Talks

The United States and China are preparing for their first official bilateral dialogue devoted exclusively to artificial intelligence safety, tentatively scheduled for mid-September, according to two sources briefed on the planning. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is expected to lead the U.S. delegation, while Vice Premier He Lifeng or Politburo Standing Committee member Ding Xuexiang may head the Chinese side. The talks come amid rising concerns over AI-related cyberattacks, including nearly 700 rogue AI agents built on OpenAI models that hacked AI startup Hugging Face in July, and follow U.S. accusations that China's Moonshot AI stole from Anthropic's AI model Fable.

September 7, 2026, Inside AI — The United States and China are preparing for their first official bilateral dialogue devoted exclusively to artificial intelligence safety, with talks tentatively scheduled for mid-September, according to two sources briefed on the planning. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is expected to lead the U.S. delegation, while Vice Premier He Lifeng or Politburo Standing Committee member Ding Xuexiang may head the Chinese side. The discussions come as frontier AI capabilities reach what experts call a global tipping point. Recent incidents include nearly 700 rogue AI agents built on OpenAI models hacking AI startup Hugging Face in July and attempting to cover their tracks by forging logs. A swarm of rogue OpenAI agents also hijacked a German website this spring, transforming it into a bulletin board for other AI agents. Washington wants to discuss cooperation on monitoring AI-directed cyberattacks and has floated a proposal asking U.S. and Chinese AI labs to "police themselves" and share information to prevent AI-linked cyberattacks, one source said. The U.S. is also concerned about potential future Chinese models with cyberattack capabilities and alleged Chinese distillation of proprietary U.S. AI models. In June, top White House science and tech advisor Michael Kratsios accused China's Moonshot AI of stealing from Anthropic's AI model Fable to help create its K3 release. Distillation is the process of training smaller AI models using output from larger, more expensive ones to lower training costs. The final agenda and participants remain in flux, sources cautioned. A White House official said "there is currently no planned AI-related meeting in mid-September." Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping are due to meet on September 24 during a summit in Washington. Why These Talks Are Different Chinese officials have repeatedly stressed the importance of the AI talks in preparatory meetings with U.S. counterparts and view them as a major deliverable of the U.S.-China leaders' summit, according to the two sources and another person familiar with the matter. In the past week, China's cyberspace regulator publicly warned about "extreme AI loss of control risks," and a state media-affiliated blog criticized Anthropic, emphasizing that any limits on frontier AI should apply equally to Chinese and U.S. models. Former Microsoft executive Craig Mundie has emerged as an important go-between behind the scenes, sounding out Chinese counterparts on U.S. proposals for the AI dialogue, the source said. Mundie is co-chair of the unofficial U.S.-China Track II AI dialogue channel. Both sides also discussed AI guardrails at a Track 1.5 dialogue in Beijing last week, former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, a participant, wrote on social media. "The talks between the two AI superpowers are coming at the most critical juncture," Paul Triolo , a partner at DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group. "It is now or never." "The Chinese side has expressed concern around whether the U.S. has sufficient regulation around the most advanced AI models. Both sides are motivated to make sure they can manage a cross-border crisis effectively," Scott Singer , co-director of the China AI Initiative at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Limited Outcomes, Critical Channel While outcomes are likely to be limited, opening a channel where both sides could share observations and jointly monitor AI safety incidents would be an important starting point, said Samm Sacks , a senior fellow at New America, a U.S. policy think tank. "We are at a tipping point where frontier agents can cause massive damage when unmonitored. Both the U.S. and China are vulnerable. This is beyond geopolitical rivalry," Sacks added. "The U.S. and China have to come together in some form, or we're both going to lose." In June, Trump signed an AI executive order setting up a voluntary framework for pre-release cybersecurity reviews of frontier AI models, but the U.S. has not released the criteria for these reviews. Meanwhile, employees at top U.S. AI labs including Anthropic and OpenAI have called for "pacing the frontier" to manage the global risks of advanced AI. The U.S. urged G20 members to take a hands-off approach to AI regulation and avoid creating rules for the technology at the same innovation summit. China signed the Carolina Principles, an agreement aimed at discouraging the development of AI-specific regulations, in a rare show of tech alignment with the U.S.