U.S. abortions rose after Dobbs, driven by mailed pills

U.S. abortions rose roughly 18% after the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision, driven entirely by abortion pills mailed via telehealth. In-person abortions fell 12%, but telehealth surged from 5% to 27% of all abortions, adding enough to push the national total to a record high in early 2025.

U.S. abortions rose after Dobbs, driven by mailed pills Part of Teaching an AI Agent to Make Beautiful Charts The widely shared story about the Dobbs decision https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392 6j37.pdf is simple: the Supreme Court let states ban abortion, bans spread across the South and Midwest, so abortions fell. The first half is right. The second half is not. Since the Court overturned Roe in June 2022, the number of abortions in the U.S. has gone up, not down. If the bans had cut the number of abortions, the line would fall. It doesn't. The national count rose roughly 18% to its early-2025 peak, and one thing accounts for the entire increase: abortion pills in the mail. The national total went up, not down Spring 2022, the last full quarter mostly before the ruling, saw about 253,750 abortions in the U.S. health care system. By early 2025 the quarterly figure peaked at 300,250. The monthly average climbed every year since: 79,600 in 2022, 88,200 in 2023, 95,300 in 2024, and 98,800 in the first half of 2025. January 2025 was the single biggest month on record for this count, with 107,740 abortions. This is not a single tracker's quirk. Guttmacher, counting on a different method, found more than 1 million abortions https://www.guttmacher.org/2024/03/despite-bans-number-abortions-united-states-increased-2023 in the formal health care system in 2023, the most since 2012. Two independent efforts that disagree on the exact numbers agree on the direction: up. The whole increase is pills in the mail Split the total into in-person care and telehealth and the mechanism is obvious. In-person care, the lower band, actually fell about 12%, from 242,110 abortions a quarter to 211,930. Telehealth, the band stacked on top, went from 5% of all abortions to 27%, growing nearly 7 times over in absolute terms. That single band added about 68,000 abortions a quarter, more than enough to cover the in-person decline and push the total higher. Telehealth here means a clinician consults with a patient remotely and mails mifepristone and misoprostol, the drugs used for a medication abortion. Medication abortion is now the majority of U.S. abortions https://www.guttmacher.org/news-release/2024/medication-abortions-accounted-63-all-us-abortions-2023-increase-53-2020 , about 63% in 2023. The rise after Dobbs did not come from more clinics. It came from the mailbox. Shield laws carried the pills into ban states The pills increasingly go to the places that banned the procedure. 13 states enforce total bans https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/key-facts-on-abortion-in-the-united-states/ , and in those states nearly all the abortions still happening are telehealth pills mailed in from providers in other states. Those providers work under shield laws https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/the-intersection-of-state-and-federal-policies-on-access-to-medication-abortion-via-telehealth-after-dobbs/ , state protections that a handful of states first enacted in 2023. By June 2025 shield-law providers were mailing roughly 14,770 abortions a month. One honest caveat lives at the mid-2023 marker on the chart: that is when shield-law provision began and the WeCount project broadened its data collection, so part of the 2023 jump is better measurement rather than pure growth. The trend holds without it, since telehealth kept climbing for 2 more years. Travel did the rest. More than 169,000 people, about 1 in 6, crossed state lines https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/induced-abortion-united-states for an abortion in 2023, double the share in 2020. Bans changed how and where people got abortions, not whether. What the count leaves out This chart only counts abortions provided by licensed clinicians. It leaves out self-managed abortions, the pills people get outside the formal system through networks like Aid Access or overseas pharmacies, which jumped by tens of thousands of requests https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2797883 in the months after Dobbs. The 2022 and 2025 windows are also partial years, and WeCount imputes 19% to 28% of its counts. Every one of those gaps points the same way: the true national total is higher than the chart shows, not lower. The count is a floor. The fight moved to the pills Because the pills are now the story, the legal fight is too. In May 2026 the Supreme Court left mifepristone available by mail and telehealth while Louisiana v. FDA https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/louisiana-v-fda-access-to-mifepristone-back-at-the-supreme-court/ moves through the courts, and the FDA moved ahead with a new safety review https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fda-launches-safety-study-for-abortion-pill-mifepristone/ of a drug it approved 25 years ago. States are fighting over the shield laws directly: Texas fined a New York doctor https://www.npr.org/2025/02/14/g-s1-48889/texas-judge-fines-new-york-doctor-abortion-pills more than $100,000 for mailing pills into the state, Louisiana indicted her, and New York refused to extradite her https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/ny-gov-hochul-rejects-louisiana-extradition-doctor-abortion-pill-case-rcna192156 . Abortion is back on the 2026 ballot https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/abortion-on-the-2026-ballot-the-evolving-landscape-of-state-abortion-initiatives/ in Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia. The data does not tell anyone which side is right, and it is not meant to. It says the simplest version of the post-Dobbs story, the one where bans cut the number of abortions, is not what the numbers show. Whatever the bans did, they did not lower the count. They moved it into the mail. How this chart was made An AI agent built this chart end-to-end as part of the Beautiful Charts with AI /beautiful-charts-with-ai series. It pulled the quarterly figures from the WeCount report, built the chart in Python, and iterated on the design until it passed the Tufte Test https://www.goodeyelabs.com/insights/the-tufte-test?utm source=randalolson-blog&utm medium=blog&utm campaign=us-abortions-rose-after-dobbs , a data visualization quality standard from Goodeye Labs. The workflow behind it is public: run the same high-signal chart workflow https://goodeye.dev/templates/randalolson/high-signal-chart-workflow?utm source=randalolson-blog&utm medium=blog&utm campaign=us-abortions-rose-after-dobbs to make your own. Data source: the Society of Family Planning's WeCount Report, April 2022 to June 2025 https://societyfp.org/research/wecount/wecount-june-2025-data/ released December 9, 2025 , which counts clinician-provided abortions including telehealth and shield-law provision and excludes self-managed abortions. The quarterly dataset used for this chart is available here /assets/2026/06/us-abortions-rose-after-dobbs.csv . Beautiful Charts with AI Make your own charts with the same workflow Every chart in this series is built by the same public workflow. Fork it and run it yourself, then grade the result against the Tufte Test. Dr. Randal S. Olson AI Researcher & Builder · Co-Founder & CTO at Goodeye Labs I’ve worked in AI for 15+ years. At Goodeye Labs, we build AI products that point frontier models at the business outcomes a team actually cares about.