cd /news/ai-infrastructure/trump-says-towns-fighting-ai-data-ce… · home topics ai-infrastructure article
[ARTICLE · art-117026] src=startupfortune.com ↗ pub= topic=ai-infrastructure verified=true sentiment=· neutral

Trump Says Towns Fighting AI Data Centers Will End Up Backwards and Poor

President Trump used Truth Social on Monday to tell American towns fighting data center construction that they risk becoming 'backwards and poor,' framing the buildout as essential to staying rich in the AI race, while a Fox News poll from July found 70% of registered voters opposed building data centers in their area and Gallup's March survey put opposition at 71%. Vice President JD Vance acknowledged that '99 percent of the backlash to data centers has come in areas where building a data center means higher utility and higher electricity bills,' and the PJM grid's independent market monitor found data center demand increased capacity costs by $9.3 billion for the 2025-26 delivery year, a 174% increase compared with a scenario without that demand.

read5 min views2 publishedAug 31, 2026
Trump Says Towns Fighting AI Data Centers Will End Up Backwards and Poor
Image: Startupfortune (auto-discovered)

Trump is selling AI data centers as a path to jobs and lower taxes, but voters are hearing something simpler: higher power bills.

President Trump used Truth Social on Monday to tell American towns fighting data center construction that they had a choice: take the buildout or fall behind. It was blunt. "The only reason that communities throughout the U.S.A. should not want Data Centers is if they want to end up being backwards and poor," he wrote, according to an archived copy of the post. "If they want to be successful and rich, with far lower taxes and jobs all over the place, let Data Reign." Then he tied the local backlash to China. "China could not be happier with this anti Data Center movement," Trump wrote. "Actually, they can't believe it is happening!"

That is the fight. Trump is framing data centers as the price of staying rich in the AI race. A lot of voters are looking at the same buildings and seeing higher utility bills, more water demand, more noise, and fewer answers from the companies asking for zoning approvals.

The numbers are awkward for him. A Fox News poll published in July found that 70% of registered voters opposed building data centers in their area, including broad opposition across age groups. Gallup's March survey put opposition at 71% of Americans, with 48% strongly opposed. That isn't a fringe complaint. It's a majority position, and it crosses the party lines that usually make technology fights easier to sort.

Politico, citing an AdImpact review, reported that more than 100 campaign ads this cycle have mentioned data centers, and not one candidate-run spot it reviewed presented the infrastructure positively. That tells you where the political pressure is landing. Candidates don't spend precious broadcast money attacking something voters barely understand or don't care about.

Three Warning Signs Point to a US Stock Market Crash That Investors May Be Ignoring The US stock market is riding a wave of optimism, but three major warning signs, AI valuations, geopolitical tensions, and investor complacency, suggest a market crash could arrive sooner than expected. - warning signs stock market crash - US stock market sentiment reversal indicators

The Bills Are The Fight #

The anger starts with electricity. On the PJM grid, which covers all or parts of 13 states and Washington, D.C., the independent market monitor found that current and projected data center demand increased capacity costs by $9.3 billion for the 2025-26 delivery year, or 174% compared with a scenario without that demand, according to PolitiFact's review of the data. Bills beat slogans.

Vice President JD Vance at least named the problem when reporters asked him about Trump's post before a Michigan trip. "I think probably 99 percent of the backlash to data centers has come in areas where building a data center means higher utility and higher electricity bills for the people on the ground," Vance said, according to Mediaite. His answer was not to slow the buildout. It was to push companies to build or secure power alongside the facilities they want to run.

"If you build a data center, you should be putting power back into the grid, not taking it out," Vance said. That part checks out as politics, because it accepts the premise voters are starting from. Trump's post mostly scolded them for noticing.

The White House has tried to blunt the issue with its Ratepayer Protection Pledge. In March, it said Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, OpenAI, Oracle, and xAI had signed a commitment to build, bring, or buy new power and cover delivery upgrades tied to their data centers. By July, the administration said the pledge had expanded to cover 80% of power delivered to U.S. homes and businesses. Fine. But a voluntary pledge doesn't erase the bills people have already seen or the zoning fights now playing out in town halls.

Permitting Is Now Political #

Look at the map. The Guardian reported that 75 data center projects worth about $130 billion were delayed or blocked in early 2026 because of local opposition. Those fights aren't happening in one kind of place. They show up in rural counties worried about water, suburbs worried about noise, and power markets already trying to handle load growth from AI and factories, not to mention electrification across the board.

AP reported last week that Oracle, Meta, Google, Amazon, and Microsoft are putting more than $700 billion into U.S. data center projects in 2026. That is why this dispute has moved so quickly from zoning board minutes to national politics. The AI boom has to touch land somewhere. Once it does, voters get a vote, even if the vote comes through a county commission rather than Congress.

Investors should notice. The market has priced a huge AI buildout as if power, land, cooling, and permits will show up when needed. But the physical world doesn't move at software speed. A model can improve in a month. A transmission line, a gas plant, or a water agreement usually cannot.

States are writing America's AI rules before Congress does State lawmakers are moving ahead with targeted AI rules despite Trump's push for one national framework. The result may be a fragmented compliance regime that large AI firms can absorb more easily than startups. - states writing AI regulations before federal laws - how states are creating their own AI rules

Trump may be right that the United States needs more computing capacity if it wants to compete with China. But telling people they're backward for questioning a project that could raise their bills is not persuasion. It's the easy answer from far away. The hard work is making data centers pay their own way and proving the local benefits - then showing residents the contracts before asking them to trust the promise.

For the AI industry, that is the real warning in Trump's post. Washington can cheer the buildout. Wall Street can fund it. If the town that has to live beside the substation says no, the project still stops there. Also read: MoonPay Turns Grok Into a Chat Interface for Buying and Lending CryptoJohn Ternus Becomes Apple's CEO As Tim Cook Steps Down After Fifteen YearsOpenAI's ChatGPT Ads Reach $1 Billion in Revenue in Just 200 Days

── more in #ai-infrastructure 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @donald trump 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/trump-says-towns-fig…] indexed:0 read:5min 2026-08-31 ·