The Problem Is the Problem: Towards Scalable Mathematical Discovery

A new human-AI discovery paradigm called Find, Attempt, and Recommend (FAR) automates the search for mathematical problems and filters candidate conjectures for expert review, according to a preprint on arXiv (2608.16977v1). In a combinatorics pilot, the pipeline started from 5,245 papers, recovered 6,453 candidate conjectures or open problems, filtered to 4,717 well-posed and still-open conjectures, surfaced 598 potential resolutions, and selected 77 for author-team review, yielding results on conjectures by Davies–Jenssen–Perkins–Roberts, Erdős–Straus, Ikenmeyer–Pak–Panova, and Lund–Saraf–Wolf.

arXiv:2608.16977v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI systems are increasingly capable of contributing to mathematical research. In research practice, frontier-model reasoning is a limited resource, and expert mathematical review is even more sharply constrained. Allocating these scarce resources well is therefore central to making AI-assisted mathematical discovery efficient. In most current AI-for-math workflows, human effort is concentrated at the beginning and end, in selecting suitable research problems and later reviewing the resulting artifacts. These two stages are becoming bottlenecks for research-level mathematics. We address them by proposing a new human-AI discovery paradigm. The human input is no longer a single problem selected in advance, but a research direction in which the experts have interest and expertise. The system then searches a broad literature corpus for candidate problems in that direction. Inspired by search and recommender systems, we build Find, Attempt, and Recommend FAR , a literature-to-review cascade that automates the search for suitable problems and focuses human attention on artifacts that have passed several stages of filtering. In a combinatorics pilot, the pipeline starts from 5,245 combinatorics papers, recovers 6,453 candidate conjectures or open problems, and filters them to 4,717 apparently well-posed and still-open conjectures. Subsequent reasoning and automated triage stages surface 598 potential resolutions and select 77 items for author-team review. Among them, we identify many interesting discoveries, including results on conjectures and questions of Davies--Jenssen--Perkins--Roberts, Erd\H{o}s--Straus, Ikenmeyer--Pak--Panova, and Lund--Saraf--Wolf. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of this new mode of human-AI collaboration for mathematical discovery.