Member-only story
A 1M-token window isn’t a 1M-token attention span. Here is the decision framework for RAG, memory, compaction, context editing, and subagents.
A 1M-token context window does not give your agent a 1M-token attention span. It gives your system a massive, expensive attic to hide stale tool output, obsolete decisions, and silent performance degradation until production reliability collapses. The real Claude 5 advantage is not more context — it is an operating system for deciding what the agent should forget.
If you are using free version of Medium, [Please consider]use link to access this article for free.[, share this article with your friends to support my work. Thank you.]following and subscribing
In this Article you’ll learn
· [The 1M-Token Trap: Capacity Is Not Attention](#7228)
· [The Context Routing Map: Five Jobs, Five Primitives](#294c)
· [Start With the Bottleneck, Not the Feature](#9db2)
· [Compaction Is a Handoff, Not a Trash Can](#da38)
· [Forget Selectively: Editing and Memory Need Governance](#02bd)
· [Subagents Earn Their Keep Only When Work Is Truly Separate](#43c1)
· [Make Context a Measured Product Surface](#3427)
· [Conclusion](#319d)