The Effective Altruists Reportedly Have Their Mojo Back Thanks to AI

Effective Altruism (EA) is experiencing a resurgence, driven by AI industry donations, according to a Financial Times report. Giving What We Can, an EA-affiliated charity, saw donations rise from $1.2 billion in 2024 to about $2 billion in 2025, with CEO Sjir Hoeijmakers saying the organization has "more than recovered" from the FTX hit. More than 60 current and former Anthropic employees have signed the 10% Pledge, and Anthropic's expected IPO could increase U.S. giving by $15 billion per year, a 2.5% rise.

The downfall of the world’s most famous adherent of the Effective Altruism EA movement, FTX co-founder Sam Bankman-Fried, was a cataclysmic astroid strike, dismantling one of Effective Altruism’s leading institutions https://gizmodo.com/sam-bankman-fried-ftx-effective-altruism-crypto-1849773116 and leaving the movement in ruins. After Bankman-Fried’s 2023 fraud conviction https://gizmodo.com/sam-bankman-fried-ftx-found-guilty-crypto-trial-1850986588 , and his broader heel turn https://gizmodo.com/sbf-floated-coming-out-republican-tucker-carlson-1851340731 , it’s become common to see people speak about effective altruism in the past tense https://davidzmorris.substack.com/p/effective-altruism-and-the-logic , as if it’s a dead religion or a fad that simply ran its course. But a new article in the Financial Times https://www.ft.com/content/938b4b82-06d2-4b92-a807-38d935d7d5c5 makes the case that, thanks to some well placed AI investment dollars, EA is back. Effective Altruists are basically high earners who make it their goal—or at least their overall rationalization—to earn a ton of money so they can funnel it to charities and other causes calculated to deliver what they perceive to be the greatest good for the world. This can mean saving the greatest possible number of vulnerably human lives, or, according to the Stanford EA Manifesto https://ea.stanford.edu/manifesto.html , having a positive impact on the future again, theoretically by, say, predicting pandemics or, as you might expect, by making AI safer. The manifesto credits EA with taking AI safety “from a fringe academic concern to mainstream research priority at every major lab.” As the FT notes, the overlap between AI and EA has only grown lately. It found that “more than 60” Anthropic employees past and present have signed onto the 10% Pledge https://www.givingwhatwecan.org/pledge from the organization Giving What We Can, which involves a tithing-like 10% donation scheme. It also notes that the company’s seven founders have all pledged to give away 80% of their fortunes. FT also claims there are well-placed EA adherents at “other fast-growing Silicon Valley groups such as OpenAI.” Consequently, the EA world is attracting, according to FT, “record levels of funding.” Giving What We Can apparently climbed from $1.2 billion in donations in 2024 to about $2 billion in 2025. The CEO of Giving What We Can, Sjir Hoeijmakers told the FT his organization experienced “ a hit from FTX,” and “a drop in general enthusiasm” but has “more than recovered from that by now.” Anthropic’s ties to EA appear to run deep. One of its co-founder’s, Daniela Amodei, is married to Holden Karnofsky, described by the New York Times as https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/18/technology/anthropic-dario-amodei-effective-altruism.html “one of the founders of the effective altruist movement.” As noted last month by Wired https://www.wired.com/story/nonprofits-are-getting-ready-for-the-funding-anthropalypse/ , analysts have crunched the numbers https://nanransohoff.substack.com/p/the-third-wave-of-american-philanthropy on what philanthropy-heavy Anthropic’s expected IPO might mean for future donations. They expect an increase of $15 billion per year—a 2.5% increase in total U.S. giving—just from one company.