{"slug": "the-data-centers-are-winning", "title": "The data centers are winning", "summary": "A Heatmap Pro and Embold Research survey found that only 15% of Americans support a data center being built in their area, down from 43% a year earlier, while 75% now oppose it. Despite this backlash, the data center boom continues, driven by strong economic forces, and is unlikely to be stopped without a national moratorium or a collapse in demand for computing power, according to Vox senior correspondent Eric Levitz.", "body_md": "In the United States, building a data center [now polls](https://heatmap.news/daily/data-center-opposition-poll-collapse) roughly as well as [abolishing the police](https://www.aei.org/commentary/attitudes-toward-the-police-five-years-after-george-floyds-death/). If current trends continue, server warehouses may soon be less popular with Americans than pizza topped with pineapple and shattered glass.\n\n# The data centers are winning\n\nWhy the AI buildout (probably) can’t be stopped.\n\n[Eric Levitz](/authors/eric-levitz)is a senior correspondent at Vox. He covers a wide range of political and policy issues with a special focus on questions that internally divide the American left and right. Before coming to Vox in 2024, he wrote a column on politics and economics for New York Magazine.\n\nIn an [August survey](https://heatmap.news/daily/data-center-opposition-poll-collapse) from Heatmap Pro and Embold Research, just 15 percent of Americans said they would support a data center being built in their area, while 75 percent expressed opposition. One year earlier, 43 percent of respondents in the same poll had approved of nearby data center development, while just 42 percent opposed it.\n\n```\nKey takeawaysData center projects are increasingly unpopular and vulnerable to local opposition.Nevertheless, the AI infrastructure buildout remains massive.The economic forces driving the data center boom are extremely strong.Since AI data centers can be located almost anywhere, it’s difficult to stop them from being built somewhere.\n```\n\nThis soaring backlash is visible in other surveys — and in the actions of elected officials. In recent weeks, Wisconsin’s gubernatorial candidates sparred over [who hates data centers more](/politics/499755/wisconsin-governor-race-data-centers-ai-crowley-tiffany), Pennsylvania’s center-left Gov. Josh Shapiro [enacted new restrictions](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2028-election/gov-josh-shapiro-executive-order-data-centers-pennsylvania-rcna593177) on AI infrastructure projects (after previously championing such investment), and even Texas’s [staunchly pro-business](https://www.politico.com/news/2026/08/23/greg-abbott-texas-data-centers-01046867) Republican government announced a temporary moratorium on new approvals.\n\nMeanwhile, data center projects are[ being canceled at a record rate](https://heatmap.news/politics/data-center-local-laws-bans-total), as local opposition mounts.\n\nThis has led some in the pro-tech minority to worry that the data center buildout [is about to collapse](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/faith-freedom-self-reliance/4653621/slowing-data-center-construction-need-reforms/) — and [take the US economy down with it](https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/banning-data-centers-would-blow-up). Anti-AI commentators, for their part, are cheering the [industry’s impending crisis](https://www.citact.org/news/citizen-power-june-2026).\n\nBut such panic and celebration are both premature.\n\nIn truth, despite exploding opposition, the data center boom is still going strong. Interviews with industry experts and recent construction data suggest that the economic forces driving the buildout remain more powerful than the political winds blowing against it. And unless Congress enacts a national moratorium, AI companies will almost certainly be able to continue finding jurisdictions willing to tolerate hyperscale campuses, in exchange for sufficient revenue and incentives.\n\nAmerica’s data center boom can be slowed and geographically shifted. But it probably can’t be killed, absent a collapse in demand for computing power or a *much* bigger revolution in American politics.\n\n**The boom is bigger than the backlash**\n\nThere are two fundamental facts about today’s data center boom: 1) The backlash against it is huge, and 2) the buildout is even bigger.\n\nThe climate news outlet Heatmap has kept a [tracker](https://heatmap.news/politics/data-center-local-laws-bans-total) of new data center restrictions and cancellations. As of late July, it found that more than 500 jurisdictions had enacted severe constraints or bans on data center construction. The vast majority of these measures had been enacted since the beginning of this year.\n\nThe publication also found that contested data center projects face a skyrocketing cancellation rate. In late 2024, 20 percent of disputed developments were canceled; in the first half of 2026, that figure was closer to 50 percent. By Heatmap’s tally, more than 100 data center projects have been nixed this year in the face of local opposition, while more than 200 are currently being fought.\n\nThis surge of mass resistance is remarkable. And yet, it is also nowhere near sufficient to *end *the AI buildout.\n\nAlthough the number of places with severe restrictions (or outright bans) on server farms is rapidly rising, more than [90 percent of US counties](https://heatmap.news/politics/data-center-local-laws-bans-total) had no significant constraints on data center development at July’s end.\n\nWhat’s more, many of the most eye-catching recent policy changes are less significant than they appear. For example, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s pause [does not actually](https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-rise-of-the-tough-on-data-centers-politician) halt data center construction in the Lone Star State. Rather, it essentially establishes a more thorough screening process, when server farms apply for electricity from the state’s grid. Projects that supply all of their own power through on-site natural gas — as [a rising share](https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2026-08-20/data-centers-going-off-grid-doesn-t-make-them-good-neighbors) of new data centers do — are exempt.\n\nPennsylvania and New York’s recently enacted restrictions on data center development are more substantial. Yet neither of those states are particularly important to the AI buildout. Taken together, New York and Pennsylvania host only about 6.5 percent of America’s data centers, according to [Data Center Map](https://www.datacentermap.com/usa).\n\nAnd their share of all *pending* developments is even more negligible, as the trade publication Construction Connect [has illustrated](https://news.constructconnect.com/august-2026-data-center-report-construction-starts-total-22.3-billion-second-highest-on-record):\n\nMeanwhile, although half of *contested* data center projects are now failing, many still go undisputed. In the aggregate, cancellations have not kept pace with construction or new development. In the first quarter of this year, at least [3.5 gigawatts of data center](https://heatmap.news/politics/local-opposition-data-center-cancellations) capacity were canceled amid local opposition, in Heatmap’s tally. During the same three months, at least 36 GW of capacity [were added to the US pipeline](https://www.woodmac.com/news/opinion/us-data-centre-developers-prioritise-existing-project-pipelines-as-new-pipeline-capacity-grows) of proposed and active projects, according to the analytics firm Wood Mackenzie. As of April 1, that pipeline contained a total of 106 GW worth of developments that had already survived the permitting gauntlet.\n\nTo be sure, cancellations have risen sharply since March. By Heatmap’s count, at least 13 gigawatts of capacity have been nixed so far this year. But the capacity of permitted projects has also grown since April 1. And the ratio between blocked and active developments has not radically changed, according to industry analysts.\n\n“At this point, we do not think the recent wave of opposition and policy intervention has materially changed our national capacity growth trajectory,” Maya Barkin, an analyst at the AI industry research firm [SemiAnalysis](https://newsletter.semianalysis.com/p/stop-saying-half-of-2026-us-datacenter), told me.\n\nIndeed, monthly [construction spending](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/monthly-spending-data-center-us?time=2022-11-01..latest) on data centers in the US hit a record high this June.\n\nIn short, data centers are marching forward despite taking heavy fire, like a pack of gut-shot zombies.\n\n**The secrets of the AI buildout’s success**\n\nWhy has the AI buildout proven so resilient? There are at least two reasons.\n\nFirst, and most importantly, demand for computing power remains astronomical. As frontier AI companies have built out larger models — and consumers and companies have increased their use of artificial intelligence and digital services — our economy’s appetite for computation has far outstripped supply. According to a [recent report](https://www.jll.com/en-us/newsroom/data-center-demand-exceeds-expectations-in-h1-2026) from the commercial real estate firm JLL, *99 percent* of North America’s data centers are occupied. What’s more, of the 66 GW of data center capacity currently being constructed in JLL’s count, 95 percent has already been reserved.\n\nSecond, data center projects are unusually location-flexible. If a housing developer gets chased out of San Francisco’s suburbs by zoning rules and local opposition, it can’t relocate its condo tower to a mostly [uninhabited stretch of Nevada desert](https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/05/20/1116287/ai-data-centers-nevada-water-reno-computing-environmental-impact/). By contrast, data centers can — and do — operate in the [middle of nowhere](https://www.semafor.com/article/01/26/2024/data-centers-in-the-middle-of-nowhere).\n\nFor certain purposes, these facilities need *some *proximity to the users they serve; you can’t adequately support online gaming in New York City with data centers on the West Coast. But even in such cases, servers merely need to be in the same broad region. The hyperscale facilities used to train AI models, meanwhile, can be located virtually anywhere with land, fiber optic cables, a modicum of labor, and electricity (and now that many data centers are powering themselves through on-site natural gas plants, even the latter is potentially expendable).\n\nTaken together, these two realities make data center construction extremely difficult to choke off. Sky-high demand for compute means that hyperscalers can afford to throw a lot of money at localities, in order to secure a project’s approval. And location flexibility makes it very difficult for data center developers to run out of host jurisdictions, particularly when so many rural counties throughout the United States are starving for revenue and investment. Thus, unless Congress imposes a national moratorium, development deals will almost certainly keep getting struck.\n\n“I think companies will need to open up their wallets and make sure that communities receive clear benefits,” John Arnold, a billionaire investor and philanthropist who sits on Meta’s board (and whose foundation has given funding to Vox), told me. “There will be places that raise their hands and say, ‘For X amount of benefit, we will welcome you into the community.’”\n\nJust this week, West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey [signaled that he was moving forward](https://www.foxnews.com/politics/west-virginia-looks-ai-data-center-boom-help-eliminate-state-income-tax) with plans to encourage data center development and use the consequent revenue to slash the state’s income tax.\n\n**Municipal permitting won’t preempt the robot apocalypse**\n\nOn one level, all this may seem to validate anti-data center activism: If there are countless potential locations for these facilities, then why should any community host one it doesn’t want?\n\nThis said, many oppose new data centers out of concern for their aggregate impacts, rather than their local ones. Climate activists fear that the AI buildout will generate [perilous increases](https://www.seedling.earth/en-us/post/the-carbon-footprint-of-data-centres-our-guide) in carbon emissions. Populists on [the right and left,](https://www.wired.com/story/how-data-centers-broke-american-politics/) meanwhile, want to slow the progress of artificial intelligence, so as to prevent the technology from [causing mass unemployment](/the-highlight/466025/ai-jobs-chatgpt-agi) — and/or [human extinction](/future-perfect/461680/if-anyone-builds-it-yudkowsky-soares-ai-risk).\n\nFor these factions, the buildout’s resilience has more complicated implications. If state and local bans are unlikely to end the boom, then green groups might be unwise to push for such measures in relatively climate-conscious areas. After all, doing so could shift development toward jurisdictions with less renewable energy, and/or fewer restrictions on carbon pollution. Given that risk, blue-state environmentalists may do more to mitigate AI’s climate impacts by regulating data center development than by banning it. Specifically, climate groups could demand that hyperscalers [help bankroll the vast expansions of clean energy](https://www.searchlightinstitute.org/research/seizing-the-data-center-buildout-for-grid-modernization/) and transmission infrastructure that the green transition has always required.\n\nFor AI doomers, on the other hand, local bans may have some instrumental value. Moratoria and other restrictions are surely slowing the data center buildout at the margin. Still, as long as hyperscale facilities remain location-flexible — and tech companies stay well-capitalized — AI infrastructure will get built *somewhere*. A national moratorium could buy significant time. But ultimately, humanity’s security from the risks of AI hinges less on whether data centers get built than on what companies are allowed to do with them — and how the wealth they generate is distributed.\n\nThe data center rebellion is among the most remarkable popular movements in recent memory. But it is arrayed against one of the largest investment frenzies in human history. Unless or until the AI industry’s alleged “[bubble](/podcasts/466649/ai-bubble-burst-data-centers-economy)” bursts, its buildout will be exceptionally difficult to stop. Yet where that buildout happens, how it’s powered — and what communities extract from it — are all up for grabs (and, increasingly, being grabbed).", "url": "https://wpnews.pro/news/the-data-centers-are-winning", "canonical_source": "https://www.vox.com/politics/501146/data-centers-bans-polls-ai", "published_at": "2026-09-01 10:45:00+00:00", "updated_at": "2026-09-01 10:52:52.980946+00:00", "lang": "en", "topics": ["ai-infrastructure"], "entities": ["Heatmap Pro", "Embold Research", "Vox", "Eric Levitz", "Josh Shapiro", "Pennsylvania", "Texas"], "alternates": {"html": "https://wpnews.pro/news/the-data-centers-are-winning", "markdown": "https://wpnews.pro/news/the-data-centers-are-winning.md", "text": "https://wpnews.pro/news/the-data-centers-are-winning.txt", "jsonld": "https://wpnews.pro/news/the-data-centers-are-winning.jsonld"}}