cd /news/generative-ai/the-building-where-i-grew-up-has-bee… · home topics generative-ai article
[ARTICLE · art-73959] src=ordinarymantrying.com ↗ pub= topic=generative-ai verified=true sentiment=· neutral

The Building Where I Grew Up Has Been Abandoned for 20 Years. I Used AI to See It Again.

A user tested four AI image tools—ChatGPT, Gemini, Doubao, and Kimi—to restore photos of their abandoned childhood home in China, finding ChatGPT best captured the era's furniture and details while Kimi performed worst.

read6 min views1 publishedJul 26, 2026
The Building Where I Grew Up Has Been Abandoned for 20 Years. I Used AI to See It Again.
Image: Ordinarymantrying (auto-discovered)

A few weeks ago, a relative sent me a photo on WeChat.

They had visited the place where I grew up — a five-story brick building about 55 years old. I hadn’t been back in years. The message came with three words: “It’s all gone.”

I looked at the photo for a long time.

Top: current state. Bottom: restored by Doubao (豆包) The building has been empty for more than 20 years. What was once a busy residential block — doors slamming, kids running, someone always cooking something — is now weeds through concrete, broken windows, staircases that lead nowhere.

My relative walked through the rooms and took photos. I could see the bones of the place I remembered: the layout, the windows, the green-painted walls that were in every building like this across China in the 1980s and 90s. But everything else was gone.

I had an idea.

What If AI Could Restore It? #

I have no old photos of the interior — nobody really took photos inside their apartments back then. But I had the current photos my relative took, and four AI image tools I wanted to test: ChatGPT, Gemini, Doubao (豆包), and Kimi.

Same abandoned rooms. Same prompt. Four AIs. Let them each guess what these rooms looked like when people actually lived in them.

The Result: A Clear Ranking

After testing all four across multiple rooms, the ranking was clear:

ChatGPT— best. Got the era right, the furniture style right, the details right.** Gemini**— second. Good on some rooms, completely wrong on others.** Doubao (豆包)— third. Usable but generic. Kimi**— worst. Didn’t understand the task well enough to produce anything close.

Here’s what that looked like in practice.

The Living Room: Where Gemini Failed #

I fed the current photo of the living room into Gemini first. The room in the photo is stripped bare — rubble on the floor, a few pieces of furniture left behind by whoever abandoned the place last. Gemini looked at it and missed badly.

Gemini — failed. The furniture style is wrong by 20 years.

The result looked like a modern apartment. Clean, yes — but wrong era, wrong style, wrong feeling entirely. I tried twice. Same result. Gemini kept imagining a version of China that didn’t exist in that building.

Then I tried ChatGPT.

ChatGPT — nailed the era: floral sofa, green metal bed frame, CRT TV in the corner.

It got it. The floral-patterned sofa. The green metal bed frame that Chinese families kept in the living room because space was short. The small CRT television on a wooden cabinet. The bare fluorescent tube hanging from the ceiling on two wires.

I don’t know how it knew. But it knew.

Room by Room #

Living Room

Left: current state. Right: ChatGPT restoration. Same window, ceiling wires, two-tone wall paint — it all matched.

The structural elements match almost exactly — the window position, the ceiling wiring, the green paint on the lower half of the walls. The AI added back the furniture and cleaned the floor.

Bedroom

Left: current state. Right: ChatGPT restoration. The wooden wardrobe survived 20 years — ChatGPT built the room around it.

The old wooden wardrobe is still standing in the abandoned version — same wardrobe, same position, in the AI restoration. ChatGPT built the rest of the room around it: a desk, a bed with a patterned quilt, a small lamp.

Kitchen

Left: current state. Right: Gemini restoration — its best result. Same tile pattern, same pipes, same floor. It cleaned the smoke stains off the ceiling.

Gemini got the kitchen right — its one success in this project. The white ceramic tiles, the same pipe configuration coming down from the ceiling, the red floor tiles, the small counter. You can see the exact same structural shapes in both photos. The AI cleaned the smoke stains off the ceiling and made it look like someone had just stepped out to go shopping.

Kimi: Last Place #

Kimi — last place. Barely different from the original ruin.

And here’s what Kimi produced — last place, and you can see why. The room is essentially unchanged. A slight brightening, maybe some edge cleanup. No furniture imagined, no era understood, no attempt to fill in what was missing. If you showed this to someone who’d never seen the original, they’d think the photo hadn’t been processed at all.

I Sent the Photos to My Relative #

I put the before-and-after comparisons together and sent them on WeChat.

My relative is in their 60s. Their understanding of AI, like most people their age in China, is basically: it’s the thing you chat with. They know about it the way you know about something you’ve heard of but never touched.

Their response: “This looks about 60% right. The layout is correct. The style is close. I didn’t know AI could do this.”

60% is an honest number. The AI didn’t know what color our curtains were, or that there was a bicycle in the corner of the living room for years, or the specific things my family had arranged in ways that made it ours. It filled in the gaps with what was statistically likely for a Chinese apartment of that era.

But 60% is also extraordinary. I fed a photo of a ruined room into a machine, typed a few sentences, and got back something that made someone say yes, that’s close to what I remember — about a place they hadn’t seen in decades.

What This Actually Is #

In China right now, a lot of ordinary people think of AI the way my relative does: you ask it questions, it answers. Maybe it helps you write a message or translate something. That’s the whole picture.

What almost nobody in that generation has seen is this: you give it a broken thing, and it imagines what the thing looked like whole.

That’s not chat. That’s something closer to memory. Imperfect, probabilistic, working from the evidence left behind — but memory.

The building is 55 years old. Parts of it will probably be demolished soon, or fall on their own. The photos my relative took might be the last record of what’s inside those rooms.

And now there’s another record — 60% accurate, made by a machine that has never been to that town and never will be.

I’ll take it.

AI image restoration ranking for this project:

🥇 ChatGPT (GPT-4o) — best, nailed the 1990s Chinese style 🥈 Gemini — strong on kitchen, failed twice on living room

🥉 Doubao (豆包) — decent but generic ❌ Kimi — worst result, didn’t capture the era at all

Related:

[ AI Life Simulator](https://ordinarymantrying.com/ai-startup-simulator-builder-ai-deepseek-founder-game/) — make the decisions of historical figures, see where they lead

[— built with three different AIs, compared side by side](https://ordinarymantrying.com/working-memory-test-built-with-three-ais/)

Working Memory Test

All Free Tools

── more in #generative-ai 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @chatgpt 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/the-building-where-i…] indexed:0 read:6min 2026-07-26 ·