cd /news/large-language-models/the-benchmark-illusion-pruned-llms-c… · home topics large-language-models article
[ARTICLE · art-30400] src=arxiv.org ↗ pub= topic=large-language-models verified=true sentiment=· neutral

The Benchmark Illusion: Pruned LLMs Can Pass Multiple Choice but Fail to Answer

Researchers found that pruned large language models can pass multiple-choice benchmarks but fail to answer the same questions in open generation, creating a 'benchmark illusion.' The study, using multilingual question answering and high-sparsity pruning methods like Wanda, showed that correct answers are often demoted rather than erased, reappearing with beam search or sampling. This suggests compressed models should be tested on production tasks, not just recognition, to avoid overstating their usability.

read2 min views1 publishedJun 17, 2026
[Submitted on 16 Jun 2026]


[View PDF](/pdf/2606.17609)

[HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2606.17609v1)

Abstract:Compressing large language models reduces memory use and inference cost, but it can also create failures that standard benchmarks miss. A pruned model may still perform well on multiple-choice evaluations, yet fail to answer the same question in open generation. We ask what pruning changes: does it erase the correct answer, or does it make the answer harder to produce as the top output?

We study this question with multilingual question answering, tracking the same questions before and after pruning. We find a benchmark illusion. Under high-sparsity pruning, especially Wanda, models often fail in greedy open generation while still selecting the correct answer under multiple-choice scoring. In these recognition-only errors, the answer is usually not gone, but demoted: it often reappears with beam search, sampling, or one in-context example. Overall, multiple-choice benchmarks can overstate the usability of compressed LLMs, creating an evaluation blind spot. Compressed models should be tested on what they can produce, not only on what they can recognize.

References & Citations

...

Bibliographic Explorer

(What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers

(What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps

(What is Litmaps?) scite Smart Citations

(What are Smart Citations?)# Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv

(What is alphaXiv?) CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers

(What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub

(What is DagsHub?) Gotit.pub

(What is GotitPub?) Hugging Face

(What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast

(What is ScienceCast?)# Demos Influence Flower

(What are Influence Flowers?) CORE Recommender

(What is CORE?)# arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

── more in #large-language-models 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @wanda 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/the-benchmark-illusi…] indexed:0 read:2min 2026-06-17 ·