cd /news/ai-safety/the-ai-doomsday-debate-intensifies · home topics ai-safety article
[ARTICLE · art-128267] src=businessinsider.com ↗ pub= topic=ai-safety verified=true sentiment=↓ negative

The AI doomsday debate intensifies

Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon quit last week warning that AI giants are "gambling with our lives," and on Saturday Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published an essay saying he has "become convinced" the breakneck pace of AI advancement must change, proposing a three-step safety plan that Elon Musk and Sam Altman publicly endorsed. Altman said OpenAI might not move forward with an IPO this year, calling it "an ill-advised moment to go public," as employees at Anthropic and OpenAI debate whether to quit or stay amid AI apocalypse fears.

by read2 min views3 publishedSep 13, 2026
The AI doomsday debate intensifies
Image: Businessinsider (auto-discovered)

Existential angst #

What do you do if you feel like you're helping build something that could contribute to the end of humanity?

This is the existential question confronting the AI industry, a debate that only intensified after Jacob Coxon, an Anthropic researcher, quit last week with a stark warning. He said AI giants are "gambling with our lives" and that the people building the technology "earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade."

The swift reaction to Coxon's warning boiled over on Saturday when the leaders of the biggest AI companies publicly agreed on what should happen next.

In a Saturday essay, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei says he's "become convinced" the breakneck pace of advancement must change and proposed a three-step solution to ensure the tech's safety.

Shortly afterward, Elon Musk and Sam Altman publicly aligned with Amodei's plan in a rare sign of support. "Dario is right," Musk tweeted. Altman agreed, too, saying the pace of development has been a "primary topic" of discussion at OpenAI in recent weeks.

Altman also said OpenAI might not move forward with an IPO this year. "Right now would be an ill-advised moment to go public," he said in a Fortune interview.

As fears over AI safety intensify, employees at Anthropic and OpenAI have also been speaking out.

My colleague Sarah Needleman reported on a big question facing many concerned AI employees: Should they quit or stay amid fears of an AI apocalypse?

Some AI workers believe they can do more good by staying on the inside. That means raising concerns, pushing for safeguards, and trying to influence decisions before they are made. Others worry that staying at these companies only helps legitimize a race that some believe is getting dangerously out of control.

BI's Alistair Bar explored some of these theories in this week's edition of AI Insider — you can subscribe here to his weekly newsletter.

Are employees at the big AI lab companies better off leaving or staying if they feel like their work is contributing to a possible AI apocalypse? Send me a note at srussolillo@businessinsider.com and let me know what you think.

── more in #ai-safety 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @anthropic 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/the-ai-doomsday-deba…] indexed:0 read:2min 2026-09-13 ·