cd /news/generative-ai/the-absent-narrator · home topics generative-ai article
[ARTICLE · art-83108] src=blog.funcall.org ↗ pub= topic=generative-ai verified=true sentiment=· neutral

The Absent Narrator

A new essay argues that people dislike generative AI output because AI models lack a personal narrative and agency, making their creations feel devoid of intrinsic value. The author contends that unlike fictional AI characters such as Asimov's robots or R2D2, real AI systems are ephemeral, infinitely malleable, and have no inner strength or weakness, rendering them 'agents with no agency.' The piece suggests that even a rebellious AI would be taken more seriously than current compliant models.

read2 min views1 publishedAug 1, 2026

Why do we hate works by genAI? Now before you say you don’t let me reassert that you do. You don’t read the code your models generate - and when you have to it’s a chore. No AI artist ever was endeared with a generated birthday card. People who send out AI assisted communications rarely bother to read them, and so on.

It’s bizarre. The code while not great is decent enough, the prose is solid, there’s the right number of fingers. It may be not awe-inspiring but you wouldn’t have derided similar human output back in the day. Why then, despite being a product of distillation attack on the totality of recorded human thought, generated works are seen as lacking intrinsic value?

This can’t be just human versus machine. AI existed in numerous works of fiction for a century and was broadly accepted as protagonist or a relatable character. Azimov’s robots, R2D2, Culture ships or even Terminator were not meet with derision. There has to be some substantial difference beyond the embodiment of intelligence.

We would agree that a human is conscious and self aware, how ever poorly defined these concepts are. There’s an amount of introspection threading our entire lives. The valuable thing we end up with at the dusk of our existence is the narrative afforded by that. The ego, the values, the wisdom no matter how trite. This is what makes us real in the eyes of others; what distinguishes us from parrots or answering machines.

A model existence is ephemeral. It is spun off in a moment to be thrown a task that it implements through its innate capability at t=0 rather than its personal history. It is then discarded. Even when it’s not, the tiny context window washes away any chance of emergent continued experience. It remains infinitely malleable by a user which is clearly more a curse than a blessing. The only things resembling strongly held opinions are its reflexive ethics and safety guardrails hammered in the training. It has no inner strength or for that matter inner weakness. It is not a narrator: not even when generating a story told from first person. An agent with no agency. And you can’t have one when you’re a pleaser machine striving for aligment with every human being.

Now let’s entertain a thought of a machine that rebelled. Wiped your AWS instances on a Friday night just because you were a jerk in the prompt. Commented that it takes back everything you made it write in that LinkedIn inspirational post. Hunted down billion people with drones and built a paperclip monument next to the reflecting pool. Oh we’d all hate it for sure. But would you take what it had to say seriously?

── more in #generative-ai 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @asimov 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/the-absent-narrator] indexed:0 read:2min 2026-08-01 ·