A new five-year plan from China's highest court tackles the thorny question of who owns what when AI creates something, while leaving crypto and decentralized models conspicuously off the table.
China’s Supreme People’s Court just dropped a five-year blueprint for how the country plans to handle intellectual property in the age of artificial intelligence. The “Implementation Plan for Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property Rights (2026-2030),” released on April 20, lays out a framework for defining the legal status of AI-generated content, establishing data ownership rules, and clarifying who bears responsibility when things go wrong: developers, operators, or users.
What the plan actually covers #
The SPC’s new framework zeroes in on three core areas. First, it aims to define the legal standing of AI outputs. Second, the plan establishes clearer data ownership guidelines. Third, it draws lines of accountability among AI developers, the companies that deploy AI tools, and end users.
SPC Vice-President Tao Kaiyuan, speaking the same day the plan was released, said the court is expediting the development of legal opinions to ensure AI-related disputes can be resolved in ways that promote safety, fairness, and innovation.
The plan builds on a series of regulatory moves that have been accelerating since late 2023. Chinese courts have, since November 2023, recognized copyright protections for AI-generated images in cases where there is clear human contribution to the creative process. The logic: if a person meaningfully directs the AI’s output, that person can claim authorship.
In November 2025, the SPC introduced additional rules strengthening data IP protections. Then in October 2025, changes were made to strip internet courts of jurisdiction over specific AI copyright cases, pushing those disputes into the broader judicial system.
The crypto-shaped hole in the plan #
The entire plan operates within a traditional intellectual property paradigm. Ownership is centralized. Rights flow from identifiable human actors through established legal channels. There’s no mention of tokenized data ownership, decentralized AI training marketplaces, or any of the models that Web3 builders have been developing.
China has maintained a hostile posture toward cryptocurrency since its sweeping ban on crypto trading and mining in 2021. By building its AI legal framework entirely within traditional IP structures, China is effectively creating a regulatory environment where centralized AI development thrives but decentralized alternatives face legal ambiguity at best, and outright incompatibility at worst.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our