Supreme Court ruling blocks thousands of lawsuits against maker of Roundup weedkiller

The Supreme Court ruled that Bayer cannot be sued in state courts over claims that its Roundup weedkiller failed to warn users of cancer risks, blocking thousands of lawsuits. The decision, a victory for Bayer and the Trump administration, found that federal regulations preempt state failure-to-warn claims because the EPA has determined glyphosate is not likely carcinogenic when used as directed.

Getting your Trinity Audio //trinityaudio.ai player ready...By LINDSAY WHITEHURST WASHINGTON AP — The Supreme Court sided with the maker of the Roundup weedkiller Thursday in a ruling expected to block thousands of lawsuits alleging it failed to warn people the product could cause cancer. The case came before the justices after a tidal wave of litigation https://apnews.com/article/roundup-lawsuits-cancer-bayer-monsanto-1db291fd66566fe090983f5f848e3366 that included some multibillion-dollar verdicts https://apnews.com/article/roundup-monsanto-cancer-lawsuit-2-billion-7f903acb350dd6f6ce09b102914eabc1 against the global agrochemical manufacturer Bayer, which acquired Roundup when it bought its original manufacturer Monsanto in 2018. The decision is a victory for the Trump administration, but one that could be tricky politically since allies in the Make America Healthy Again https://apnews.com/article/rfk-jr-kennedy-trump-health-hhs-maha-5e1e9e3208c42b6a185facad26e3b457 movement want to rein in pesticide use. The high court https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court found that the company can’t be sued in state courts because federal regulations have found a cancer link unlikely. The case before the court https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-roundup-monsanto-c08ef6e35ccc166a4793dd76748ccce2 was filed by Missouri resident John Durnell. He developed a cancer called non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma after more than 20 years of serving as the neighborhood association’s “spray guy,” using Roundup on parks in his historic St. Louis community. A jury agreed that the company failed to warn him about possible cancer dangers and awarded him $1.25 million. It’s one of thousands of similar cases, including some multibillion-dollar damage awards. There’s still fierce debate about cancer and Roundup’s key ingredient, glyphosate. The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer classified the chemical as “probably carcinogenic” in 2015. The Environmental Protection Agency has determined that it’s not likely to cause cancer in humans when used as directed. The agency approved a label without a cancer warning, and Bayer argues that it’s required to follow those federal standards — not the state laws that Durnell and others have sued under. The ruling could allow other suits alleging problems with the way the product was designed, his attorney Ashley Keller has said. Bayer disputes the cancer claims but previously set aside $16 billion to settle cases, and earlier this year proposed a $7.25 billion class-action settlement to resolve many of the remaining claims. A federal judge recently ruled that the proposed settlement will be heard in a Missouri state court, where many of the lawsuits have been filed. At the same time, the company has tried to persuade states to pass laws shielding it from liability https://apnews.com/article/bayer-roundup-pesticide-cancer-lawsuits-35a9e6d8773b5145c920d919a28fdb83 in failure-to-warn lawsuits, and three states have agreed. About 200,000 Roundup-related claims have been made against Bayer, mostly from home users. It has stopped using glyphosate in Roundup sold in the U.S. residential lawn and garden market. The company has said it might have to consider pulling glyphosate from U.S. agricultural markets if it keeps getting sued. Agricultural industry group say could have a devastating effect on the food supply. But pesticides have also created a rift between the Trump administration and members of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy’s MAHA movement, adding to their frustration with an executive order aimed at boosting glyphosate’s production. Kennedy himself has said repeatedly that glyphosate causes cancer, even as he says he recognizes the executive order was necessary for food supply and national security reasons.