SPEC.md: 3Blue1Brown-style explainer videos made entirely by Claude. The explaining rules (term budget), look, voice, music recipe, mix, export, and a paste-in prompt to build your own. A developer used Claude Code with Opus 5.5 to produce four 3Blue1Brown-style explainer videos on materials science, including a superconductor video, without ever opening a video editor. After an initial version that introduced 50 new terms in seven minutes, the developer had Claude analyze Grant Sanderson's explanation style and codify it into rules, including a budget of one new term per roughly 150 spoken words, which cut the second version to six new terms across 979 words. The writeup publishes the full recipe — visual look, voice, music, mix, export settings and a paste-in prompt — for rebuilding the pipeline. I wanted to finally understand materials science, so I had Claude make me 3Blue1Brown-style explainer videos about it. Dark canvas, formulas that write themselves on in color, a calm narrator, a soft piano score. Four videos so far 6 to 15 minutes each , a few evenings with Claude Code + Opus 5.5. I never opened a video editor. The first version was unwatchable. It introduced 50 new terms in 7 minutes and I did not understand half of it myself. So I had Claude study how Grant Sanderson actually explains things, measure it, and turn it into rules. The rules are the part worth sharing. The rest of this file is every setting you need to rebuild the whole thing: look, voice, music, mix, export, and a prompt to paste into Claude Code. | | 3Blue1Brown, ch. 1 | My v1 | My v2 after these rules | |---|---|---|---| | Spoken words | ~3,800 | 1,111 | 979 | | New terms and names | ~25 | 50 | 6 | | Words per new term | ~150 | 22 | 163 | | Running examples | 1 | ~10 | 1 | Contents: 1 How to explain · 2 The look · 3 The voice · 4 The music · 5 The mix · 6 QA · 7 Export · 8 The pipeline · 9 Build your own paste-in prompt · 10 Credits Source studied: 3Blue1Brown's own text versions of two of his most-watched lessons, "But what is a neural network?" deep learning ch. 1 and "Gradient descent, how neural networks learn" ch. 2 , at 3blue1brown.com/lessons. This is an analysis with a few short quotes. It is not a copy of his text; his work is copyrighted. | | 3Blue1Brown ch. 1 | 3Blue1Brown ch. 2 | My superconductor video v1 | |---|---|---|---| | Spoken words | ~3,800 ~19 min | ~2,500 | 1,111 7.3 min | | New terms and names | ~25 | ~13 | 50 | | Words per new term | ~150 | ~190 | 22 7× too dense | | Words before the first jargon | ~400 | recap of ch. 1 | ~30 | | Running examples | 1 handwritten digits | the same one | ~10 | 1. Term budget: one new term per ~150 spoken words. A 6–7 minute video ~900 words gets at most 6 new terms . 2. Name only what you will use three more times. Say everything else in plain words: "a very sensitive magnet sensor", not "magnetometer"; "swap in a few different atoms", not "doping"; "a fusion company", not the company's name. 3. Picture first, then the name. Show it, let it sink in, then say "this is what physicists call X." He does it the same way: "We call this additional number a bias." Never say a name for something the viewer has not already seen. 4. One running example carries the whole video. He uses one digit recognizer for 19 minutes. Pick one concrete thing a magnet floating over a cold disk and return to it in every chapter. 5. Open on something the viewer already knows, with no jargon for the first ~60 seconds. He opens with a working demo and how effortless reading digits is for a person. 6. Give a simple mental model by decree, and say it is a simplification: "all I want you to think is 'a thing that holds a number.'" 7. Ask the viewer a question, then answer it. "Why not just…?", "How sure does this feel?" One per chapter. 8. Give big numbers a physical anchor. 13,002 parameters become "knobs and dials"; 10,000 km of tape becomes "a quarter of the way around the Earth". 9. Intuition first, then the formula, said in words first. At most one formula per idea. 10. Admit what is hard or skipped. "It's kind of reassuring that this looks complicated." 11. Three proper nouns per video, max. No lists of companies, cities, materials or years. One year per era. 12. Callbacks and one recap. Start each chapter by reminding the viewer where we are. End on the one idea, not a list. 13. Slow enough to think. He spends ~150 words on each idea. If a chapter has more than one new idea, split it or cut one. Give the model the script alone, in a fresh context: You are a curious non-expert hearing this script once, at normal speed. List every word or name you would not use at dinner, in order of first appearance, with its word position. List the proper nouns separately. Then report: total spoken words, new terms, words per new term, proper nouns. PASS only if words per term ≥ 150 and proper nouns ≤ 3. For each term over budget, propose the plain-words replacement. Over budget means rewrite the script. Do not narrate it and hope. - Term audit PASS: ≥ 150 words per new term, ≤ 3 proper nouns - One running example named in chapter 1 and seen again in every chapter - Every term appears on screen as a picture before it is said - Each chapter answers one question the viewer can repeat in one sentence | Piece | Setting | |---|---| | Canvas | 1920×1080 HTML