I’ve been building Sol0mon, an experimental system that coordinates independent AI models to research problems, identify disagreements, debate competing approaches, verify claims and carry decisions into optional implementation and testing.
The goal is to explore whether structured disagreement and verification can make AI-assisted engineering more reliable than relying on a single model.
The MVP is developed, and the project is available for inspection:
I’d appreciate feedback from people working on AI agents, orchestration, evaluation and developer tooling.
In particular: Is this a problem worth solving, and what would you want to see demonstrated before considering using a system like this?
Those are interesting feedbacks, thank you! I will try to get it fixed. I had ran out if credits just before testing the credibility of the verified results against a frontier model. I was able to complete the mvp. So I wanted feed back before investing more in something that might not be viable.
The browser provides low cost alternative to apis but it doesn’t break the tos only if used for individual purposes. I might add the api usage for enterprise use if needed.
This is actually based on a research paper that said multi model debate creates better results. But frontier models have progressed so rapidly, it needs to be tested.