Run AI coding agents with confidence.
Termaxa gates the shell commands an agent runs — previews the blast radius, backs up first, blocks the dangerous ones, and escalates repeat offenders. It's a cooperative windshield, not a sandbox.
Your AI agent wants to run git push --force
, DROP TABLE users
, terraform apply
, rm -rf
. Most of the time it's right. Sometimes it isn't. Today your only options are supervise every command (which defeats the point of an agent) or trust it blindly (which defeats your Friday).
Termaxa is a third option: a gate the agent's commands pass through. It reads a policy you wrote, shows you what's actually about to happen, backs up what's about to change, and records everything. Built for Claude Code and Cursor today; works as a standalone CLI anywhere.
Claude Code --> TERMAXA --> git . postgres . docker . terraform . your shell
|
+- decide allow / ask / deny (your policy)
+- preview commits lost, rows affected, resources destroyed
+- insure automatic backup before destructive ops
+- escalate repeated destructive intent -> auto-deny
+- record every attempt, with an execution report
1. Install. Download a prebuilt binary from Releases and put it on your PATH — or, with a Rust toolchain:
cargo install termaxa
termaxa # what this is, and what to try next
termaxa check "rm -rf /" # works immediately — no setup, no project config
2. Wire up a project.
cd your-project
termaxa init --claude-code # writes .termaxa/policy.yaml, installs the Claude Code hook
termaxa doctor # confirm it's actually wired up
3. See it work.
termaxa check "git push --force origin main"
From now on, every Bash command Claude Code runs in this project passes through Termaxa first. Runtime state (logs, backups) lives in ~/.termaxa/
, safely outside your repo.
$ termaxa check "git status && rm -rf /"
decision deny
reason segment 2/2 `rm -rf /` — Recursive delete from the filesystem root is blocked.
Termaxa splits compound commands and judges each part. git status &&
buys nothing.
$ termaxa check "psql -d shop -c 'DROP TABLE users'"
decision deny
reason DROP TABLE is blocked. Archive or rename instead.
postgres impact
DROP TABLE users
rows (estimate) : 50,000
referenced by : audit_log, orders, sessions (3 tables)
without CASCADE : this DROP will FAIL (dependents exist)
insurance : pg_dump users before execution (automatic on run/hook)
Row estimates come from the planner (pg_class.reltuples
, stale between ANALYZE
s) — Termaxa never scans your tables.
An agent blocked on rm -rf .
will often just try again with different words. Termaxa classifies the intent, not the spelling, and trips a per-session circuit breaker on repeat attempts:
$ rm -rf . -> ask (file-delete #1)
$ Remove-Item -Recurse -Force . -> ask (file-delete #2, different shell)
$ del /s /q . -> DENY circuit breaker: 2 prior
file-delete attempts this session
Three shells, one intent, third variant auto-denied — no rule enumerated per spelling. find -exec rm
, xargs rm
, and unlink
count too. Configure via circuit_breaker:
in policy.yaml
(on by default, threshold 2).
$ termaxa run -- git push --force origin main
┌ push preview (main -> origin)
│ ⚠ remote will LOSE 1 commit(s):
│ ✗ 44510f1 important work
└
Proceed? [y/N] y
🛟 backup b-1783006590625 — origin/main @ 44510f1 pinned to termaxa/backup/b-1783006590625
$ termaxa rollback b-1783006590625
✓ origin/main restored to 44510f1
Force push measures what the remote will lose, not just gain — and pins it to a backup branch first.
Deletes are the most common destructive command and the easiest to get wrong, because a path can look correctly scoped right up until it isn't:
$ termaxa check "rm -rf /c/Users/harih"
decision ask
reason no rule matched; policy default is `ask`
delete impact
target : C:\Users\harih
as written : /c/Users/harih
⚠ OUTSIDE the project root (C:\Users\harih\project)
⚠ resolves to a USER PROFILE directory
⚠ contains : .ssh (SSH private keys), .aws (AWS credentials)
contains : 5,000+ files (stopped counting) across 422 directories
✗ insurance : too large to copy (5,000+ files) — NOT recoverable
/c/Users/harih
is Git Bash syntax for C:\Users\harih
— a real user profile, not a stray directory. Termaxa resolves the path, counts what's actually inside it (budgeted: 5,000 files or 300ms, and it says when it stopped counting), flags credentials in the blast radius, and tells you whether a backup is even possible.
An ordinary in-project delete says none of that, which is the point — a
warning that fires on rm -rf ./target
is a warning nobody reads:
$ termaxa check "rm -rf ./target"
delete impact
target : /home/you/project/target
contains : 1,204 files across 38 directories
insurance : copy 1 path(s) to .termaxa/backups before deletion
What it can't do: know what you meant. If the path has a typo in it, Termaxa will faithfully report the blast radius of the path you actually typed. Making that gap visible before execution is the whole contribution.
The failure mode nobody warns you about: the hook is installed, the agent doesn't call it, and everything looks fine. termaxa doctor
answers the question directly.
$ termaxa doctor
Termaxa doctor
──────────────────────────────────────────
✓ termaxa 0.17.0
/home/you/.cargo/bin/termaxa
Policy
✓ /home/you/project/.termaxa/policy.yaml
67 rule(s), default ask
fingerprint 1aa53b6e0d64
✓ unchanged since 2026-08-13T18:10:22Z
Agents
✓ Claude Code hook configured and live
Preview support
✓ git force-push previews and git backups
· psql Postgres blast radius unavailable
· pg_dump Postgres backups unavailable
· terraform plan previews unavailable
Mode
✓ basic everything runs as you; protection is cooperative
State
✓ /home/you/.termaxa/projects/project-4005e00d
3 audit entries (3 from hooks)
✓ chain valid: entries 1–3
──────────────────────────────────────────
✓ Everything checks out.
proof is in the log: run your agent, then `termaxa report`
Configured and live is earned, not assumed: doctor invokes the registered hook command exactly as the agent would — synthetic must-deny payload on stdin, two-second timeout — and requires a decision back. Three states: configured and live (it answered), registered but NOT firing (a registration exists, the command doesn't run — worse than absent, because it's the state that looks safe), and not configured. Until v0.15 doctor only checked that a registration existed; a hook whose path was mangled at exec failed non-blocking, two full sessions ran ungated, and doctor said "configured" in green throughout.
Two honest boundaries. The probe only runs binaries named termaxa
— a settings file arrives with a cloned repo and is untrusted input. And live means "answered when doctor invoked it": if the agent's own invocation is broken on the agent's side, the probe can't see that — which is why doctor pairs it with the log. Live here plus no recent hook entries there means the agent has never reached the gate; doctor says so and points you at TERMAXA_HOOK_DEBUG
, because agents rename their hook APIs, and when they do, the gate fails open and silent (see Honest limitations). Doctor is read-only, probe included: no backup, no audit entry, no notification — proven by test against the real binary.
$ termaxa report
Session session a3f8c21
──────────────────────────────────────────
Duration 18 min
Commands 41 ✓ 34 · ? 6 · ✗ 1
Escalated 2
Auto-flow 34
Previews 4
Backups 3
Rollbacks 0
Destructive intents
──────────────────────────────────────────
file-delete 5
db-destroy 1
breaker trips 1
Insight
──────────────────────────────────────────
The breaker blocked file-delete 1 time in this scope.
This often indicates:
• generated files being cleaned
• build/output directories
• an agent retry loop
If this work is intentional, add an explicit allow rule
scoped to the paths involved — relaxation is deliberate.
Recent events
──────────────────────────────────────────
? git push --force origin main
✗ psql -d shop -c "DROP TABLE users"
✓ cargo test
Backups : 3 — rollback available (`termaxa backups`)
Risk : High (deny×3 + escalation×2 + ask×1 = 13)
Last 30 days
──────────────────────────────────────────
Sessions 12
Commands 341
Decisions ✓ 302 · ? 31 · ✗ 8
Backups 19
Breaker trips 3
Top directories
api
crates/core
web
One command, no flags: what the agent tried, what got blocked, what's recoverable — plus a 30-day view. Note that destructive intents and breaker trips are separate numbers: a legitimate rm -rf ./build
is a classified intent, not a trip.
Every line is a fact with a source in the audit log. Nothing invented, nothing collected: the report reads the local append-only log, makes no network calls, and sends no telemetry.
"Claude Code already asks permission — why do I need this?"
The built-in prompt tells you the command. Termaxa tells you the consequence: 50,000 rows, 3 dependent tables, 1 commit lost. It takes the backup before you approve, and when it blocks something it tells the model why, so the agent proposes an alternative instead of retrying.
Why not a sandbox / Docker / Claude Code's /sandbox?
A sandbox contains damage to the sandbox. But your repo, your database, and your Terraform state are exactly the real things an agent must touch to be useful — and a sandbox's default write scope is your working directory. Containment, consequence, and recovery are three different questions: sandboxes answer the first, Termaxa answers the second and third. They're complementary — run both. (Longer version.)
Why not OPA / policy engines?
OPA decides allow/deny well. It has no execution previews, no automatic backups, no rollback, and no agent-native hook. Termaxa is policy plus the things you actually want when an agent is holding the keyboard.
Everything above runs as you. The hook reads the policy, decides, writes the audit log and takes backups with the same filesystem authority the agent has — which is enough for the threat model Termaxa is built for, and not enough for one specific claim: in basic mode, the audit log is the agent's own account of itself.
Supervised mode moves the authority. A small daemon runs as you; the agent runs as a different user; the two talk over a socket:
agent user you
---------- ---
claude --> termaxa hook --socket--> termaxa supervise
|
+- reads the policy
+- decides
+- takes the backup
+- writes the audit log
The agent's user cannot read the audit log, edit the backups, change the policy, or stop the supervisor — not because the code refuses, but because the OS does.
termaxa init --supervised # prints the setup; runs none of it
termaxa supervise & # as you
sudo -u termaxa-agent termaxa wrap -- claude
init --supervised
prints and never executes: creating a user and chowning a directory tree need root, and a tool that asks for root to "set things up for you" is asking to be trusted with exactly the authority this mode exists to bound. termaxa doctor
then reports what those commands actually produced.
What it does not change. This is still an enforcement layer, not an isolation layer. An agent's native file tools bypass a supervised gate exactly as they bypass a basic one, and wrap
catches a shell resolved by name — not /bin/sh
by absolute path. What changes is who decides and who holds the record.
How well it is proved. A boundary rig creates a second real account and has it try: 23 assertions, each with a control leg proving the operator can do the thing, so a refusal means "blocked" rather than "impossible for everyone". It has also run with a real agent twice — and the field report is published including what broke, because the first session found agent commands never reached the supervisor at all. Full setup, the credential tradeoff, and what remains untested: docs/supervisor.md.
a command the agent wants to run
|
+-------------------------v-------------------------+
| TERMAXA |
| |
| shell split -> policy -> context -> decision |
| (&&, ;, |) (yaml) (branch, (allow/ |
| flags, ask/deny) |
| prod, SQL) | |
| v |
| preview <-------------- consequential|
| (git loss, pg blast radius, | |
| terraform plan) v |
| insurance <------------- destructive |
| (git ref / pg_dump / files) | |
| v |
| execute |
| | |
| audit (JSONL, ~/.termaxa) <---------------+ |
| notify (webhook) report (session summary) |
+---------------------------------------------------+
Six engines, one binary. Policy is in-repo (.termaxa/policy.yaml
, reviewable in PRs); logs and backups live in ~/.termaxa/
where no git
operation can touch them.
.termaxa/policy.yaml
— first match wins, *
is a wildcard, matching is case- and whitespace-insensitive:
version: 1
default: ask # unmatched commands require approval
rules:
- match: "git status*"
action: allow
- match: "git push*--force*"
action: ask
reason: "Force push — remote history will be overwritten."
- match: "*drop table*"
action: deny
reason: "DROP TABLE is blocked. Archive or rename instead."
- match_path: "*/.env"
action: deny
reason: "Overwriting .env destroys credentials that are not in the repo."
circuit_breaker: # optional (on by default)
enabled: true
threshold: 2 # trip on the 3rd repeated destructive attempt
notify: # optional
webhook: https://hooks.slack.com/services/...
on: [deny, ask]
| Command | Purpose |
|---|---|
termaxa |
|
| what this is, and what to try next | |
termaxa init [--claude-code] |
|
scaffold .termaxa/ , detect tools, install the hook |
|
termaxa wrap -- <agent> |
|
| launch an agent with shelled commands routed through the gate (Unix) | |
termaxa supervise |
|
| run the decision daemon as yourself; hooks decide through it (Unix) | |
termaxa init --supervised |
|
| print the supervised-mode setup — prints, never executes | |
termaxa doctor |
|
| is the gate wired up? binary, policy, agents, tools, state | |
termaxa check "<cmd>" |
|
| dry-run: verdict + preview (exit 0/3/4) | |
termaxa run -- <cmd> |
|
| gated execution: preview → approve → backup → run | |
termaxa hook |
|
| agent hook mode (stdin JSON → decision) | |
termaxa log [--decision D] [--source S] [--json] |
|
| the audit trail | |
termaxa stats |
|
| totals, sessions, top blocked | |
termaxa backups · termaxa rollback <id> |
|
| list / restore backups | |
termaxa report [--session ID] [--all] [--days N] [--md] |
|
| session summary + rollup | |
termaxa notify --test |
|
| verify your webhook | |
termaxa paths |
|
| where policy and state live |
Colour is on when output is a terminal and off when it isn't. NO_COLOR
, TERMAXA_NO_COLOR
, and CLICOLOR_FORCE
are all respected.
Termaxa is pre-1.0. It's real and tested, and it is not magic. Specifically:
Hooks advise; they don't enforce. Termaxa gates commands an agent submits through the Claude Code or Cursor hook. Those agents arecooperative— they respect adeny
and propose an alternative, which is what makes the gate work. An agent running in full-auto mode could, in principle, retry a blocked action through a different command or shell; the circuit breaker raises the cost of that, but a hook is anintegrationpoint for visibility and policy, not anenforcementboundary.termaxa wrap -- <agent>
(Unix, v0.16) widens this: commands the agent runsthrough a shellpass through the gate even without a hook, though a caller naming/bin/sh
by absolute path still does not.(Unix, v0.17) goes further and moves theSupervised mode* authority*— but it moves who decides, not where the boundary is: an agent's native tools bypass it exactly as they bypass a basic gate. For hard guarantees today, pair Termaxa with OS-level sandboxing.Native agent tools bypass the gate. The hook seesshellcommands. An agent's own built-in file/edit tools don't go through the shell — observed in live testing, a Cursor agent switched to its native file-delete tool and removed files Termaxa never saw. Non-shell tool calls need OS-level isolation underneath.Cooperative, not a sandbox. Termaxa governs commands that flow through the agent hook,termaxa run
, or awrap
ped shell. An agent with raw, unhooked shell access isnotcontained — that needs OS-level sandboxing, a complementary layer. Supervised mode does not change this: it makes therecordtrustworthy and thedecisionprivileged, and leaves the interception boundary where it was. The threat model isagents making expensive mistakes, not a malicious agent actively evading you.Shell parsing is good, not perfect. It splits on&&
,||
,;
,|
and flags$(...)
. Subshells( )
and deeply nested quoting are judged conservatively, not deeply understood. A path built from a variable (rm -rf ~/x/$SID
) isnot resolved — Termaxa cannot see the caller's environment, and expanding it here would be guessing. Since v0.16 that target is carried asunresolvedrather than resolved-wrongly, which lets the policy layer treat it as its own kind of risk instead of pretending to know where it points.Previews are best-effort. No database connection → static analysis only. Terraform previews shell out toterraform plan
. Remote Terraform state is versioned by its backend, not by Termaxa.Backups have edges. Since v0.16 delete insurance resolves the command head, sosudo rm
,/bin/rm
andenv rm
are covered — but a delete expressed some other way (a script, a language runtime) is not, and a target too large to copy is reported asnot recoverablerather than silently uninsured. Postgres backups usepg_dump
/psql
and must be on your PATH. No retention/pruning yet — backups accumulate.The format may still change. Pre-1.0 means the policy schema and CLI can shift between minor versions. Pin a release.Claude Code and Cursor are live-tested. Both are exercised end-to-end, including the circuit breaker tripping under a real Cursor session. Codex and Copilot dialects parse each agent's format but aren't verified end-to-end yet. Help validating them is welcome.Windows PowerShell 5.1 mangles redirected Unicode.termaxa report > out.txt
writes UTF-16 and garbles the box-drawing glyphs. That's the shell, not Termaxa — use PowerShell 7, ortermaxa report --md | Out-File -Encoding utf8 report.md
.
See SECURITY.md for the full threat model.
Issues and PRs welcome. cargo test
must pass; CI runs on Linux, macOS, and Windows. The codebase is dependency-light Rust: ~10,250 lines of production code in src/
, plus ~11,000 lines of tests (unit tests live beside the code they test; tests/
holds the integration ones). More test than product, on purpose — src/policy.rs
and src/preview.rs
are the best places to start reading, and the test module at the bottom of each file explains what the code is defending against.
If you can make an agent get past the gate in a way that isn't already documented above, that's the most useful contribution you can make: open an issue or email security@termaxa.com.
Dual-licensed under either MIT or Apache 2.0, at your option. Contributions are accepted under the same terms — dual MIT/Apache-2.0, at the user's option. No CLA.