Detect LLM hallucinations and quantify uncertainty in microseconds without secondary NLI cross-encoders.
Traditional epistemic uncertainty estimation in LLMs relies on Semantic Entropy (SE) (Kuhn et al., 2023; Farquhar et al., Nature 2024). While effective, Semantic Entropy requires clustering
This introduces two severe production bottlenecks:
Quadratic Cost:$\binom{K}{2}$ forward passes per query (45 neural evaluations for$K=10$ ). 2. Serving Latency: Adds $\sim$90 ms of GPU overhead per inference call, making it unusable for high-throughput production serving.
Spanda introduces Exact-Match Normalized Entropy ( $R_{sc}$): a zero-parameter, zero-GPU metric that computes uncertainty directly over deterministic lexical clusters.
Across empirical evaluations spanning two orders of magnitude (1.5B to 120B parameters), Spanda matches or exceeds neural Semantic Entropy on structured reasoning while operating ~90,000$\times$ faster (
As model capacity increases from 1.5B to 27B parameters, internal reasoning coherence causes correct predictions to naturally converge to identical lexical sequences. On mathematical reasoning (GSM8K), exact-match AUROC scales monotonically:
At 7B+ parameters, Spanda achieves the exact same discriminative power as heavy DeBERTa-v3 NLI cross-encoders, rendering the neural clustering step redundant for reasoning.
At the 120B frontier scale on ungrounded factual recall (TriviaQA), the model exhibits Confident Mode Collapse: its parametric memory and RLHF tuning cause it to hallucinate the exact same incorrect answer identically across all inverted AUROC of 0.091 (
Critical Safety Implication: Any system using self-consistency or agreement as a proxy for truth will be systematically deceived by frontier models on ungrounded factual recall. External grounding (RAG) is mandatory in this regime.
⚠️
| Model Scale | Benchmark | Accuracy | Spanda ( | Neural SE AUROC | Latency | GPU Req. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen-1.5B | GSM8K | 11.4% | 0.577 | 0.584 | None | |
| Qwen-1.5B | TriviaQA | 32.0% | 0.797 | 0.801 | None | |
| Mistral-7B | GSM8K | 8.2% | 0.706 | 0.705 | None | |
| Mistral-7B | TriviaQA | 45.0% | 0.698 | 0.755 | None | |
| Qwen-27B | GSM8K | 61.2% | 0.889 | --- | None | |
| DeBERTa Baseline | N/A | --- | --- | --- | $\sim$92.4 ms | Required |
Empirical audit conducted across 50,000 evaluation iterations and 300 concurrent live HTTP reverse-proxy round-trips:
| Metric / Dimension | ⚡ Spanda Rust Gateway ( spnda ) |
🐢 LiteLLM Python ( litellm ) |
Neural Semantic Entropy (DeBERTa) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mathematical Kernel Latency | 652.1 nanoseconds (0.65 µs) | ~15,000 µs (with neural judge) | 92,400 µs (92.4 ms) |
| Kernel Throughput (Single Core) | 1,533,500 evals/sec | ~200,000 evals/sec (no-op hook) | ~10 evals/sec |
| Cold Startup Time | 3.69 ms | 1,177.08 ms (1.17 s) | N/A |
| Memory Footprint (Idle RSS) | 2.98 MB | 229.61 MB | ~1.8 GB GPU VRAM |
| Proxy Net Latency Overhead | 0.076 ms (76.3 µs) | 12.0 – 28.0 ms (FastAPI/Uvicorn) | N/A |
| Hardware Requirement | Pure CPU (Zero GPU) | Pure CPU (plumbing) / GPU (judge) | Dedicated Nvidia GPU |
Given
The Normalized Shannon Entropy is: $$H_{\text{norm}} = \begin{cases} 0 & \text{if } n = 1 \ \displaystyle\frac{-\sum_{i=1}^n w_i \ln w_i}{\ln K} & \text{if } n > 1 \end{cases}$$
The combined Spanda Risk Score ( $R_{sc}$) balances entropy dispersion with modal dominance (
$R_{sc} = 0$ : Complete consensus (model is confident). #
$R_{sc} \to 1$ : Maximum epistemic divergence (model is guessing / hallucinating).
Spanda is lightweight and requires zero third-party dependencies (pure Python standard library).
pip install spnda
(Package name on PyPI is spnda; module is imported in Python as import spanda)
Or install from source:
git clone https://github.com/Adarshent/Spnda.git
cd Spnda
pip install -e .
Wrap any standard OpenAI, Groq, Ollama, or OpenAI-compatible client with transparent multi-path epistemic uncertainty quantification (
import spanda
from openai import OpenAI
client = spanda.wrap(OpenAI(), k=3, threshold=0.35, block=False)
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4o-mini",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "What is 17 * 19?"}]
)
print(response.spanda.rsc) # 0.0000 (Unanimous consensus)
print(response.spanda.is_safe) # True
print(response.spanda.decision) # 'FAST_PASS_CONSISTENT'
print(response.spanda.latency_us) # 0.7 µs!
print(response.choices[0].message.content) # Dominant consensus answer
If block=True is passed and the model hallucinates or diverges, spanda.wrap raises a SpandaUncertaintyError before invalid data reaches your users.
For production microservices and non-Python languages (TypeScript, Go, Rust, Ruby, curl), run the standalone compiled Rust gateway:
spnda serve --upstream http://localhost:11434/v1 --port 8080 --block --k 3
spnda bench --iterations 200000
spnda eval "42" "42.0" "42"
Any application in any language can simply point base_url="http://localhost:8080/v1" to receive automatic sub-microsecond epistemic verification, Prometheus /metrics, and headers:
X-Spanda-Rsc: 0.0000X-Spanda-State: CONSISTENTX-Spanda-Decision: FAST_PASS_CONSISTENTX-Spanda-Latency-Us: 0.7X-Spanda-Attractor: false
from spanda import compute_rsc, detect_hallucination, batch_compute_rsc
samples = ["Paris", "paris.", "Paris", "Paris", "Paris"]
res = compute_rsc(samples)
print(f"R_sc Score: {res['rsc']}") # 0.0 (High confidence)
print(f"Dominant Answer: {res['dominant_answer']}") # 'Paris'
guard = detect_hallucination(["42", "42", "24", "17", "99"], threshold=0.35)
if guard["is_uncertain"]:
print(f"🚨 Hallucination Warning (R_sc = {guard['rsc']}). Routing to RAG / Review.")
else:
print(f"✅ Safe output: {guard['dominant_answer']}")
batch = [
["Answer A", "Answer A", "Answer A"],
["Choice 1", "Choice 2", "Choice 3"]
]
for r in batch_compute_rsc(batch):
print(r["rsc"], r["dominant_answer"])
For mission-critical production pipelines, Spanda provides a 2-Tier Cascaded Guardrail that combines sub-millisecond consensus filtering with context grounding and tool-call safety:
from spanda import CascadedGuardrail
guard = CascadedGuardrail(
uncertainty_threshold=0.3,
grounding_threshold=0.15
)
rag_context = "Documentation: The production cluster runs in us-east-1."
unanimous_hallucination = ["eu-west-3 Paris", "eu-west-3 Paris", "eu-west-3 Paris"]
receipt = guard.evaluate(unanimous_hallucination, context=rag_context)
print(receipt.decision) # 'MODE_COLLAPSE_RISK'
print(receipt.is_safe) # False (Unanimous agreement, but 0% grounded in source!)
print(receipt.tier_executed) # Tier 2
print(receipt.latency_ms) # < 0.05 ms
tool_calls = [
{"command": "rm -rf /var/cache"},
{"command": "rm -rf /var/log"}, # Conflict detected across parallel paths!
]
agent_receipt = guard.evaluate_tool_calls(tool_calls)
print(agent_receipt.decision) # 'TOOL_ARG_MISMATCH' (Execution blocked!)
import json
print(json.dumps(receipt.to_dict(), indent=2))
Spanda connects into modern enterprise LLM pipelines with zero external dependencies:
from spanda.integrations.langchain import SpandaStringEvaluator
evaluator = SpandaStringEvaluator(uncertainty_threshold=0.35)
result = evaluator.evaluate_strings(
prediction=["Paris", "Paris", "Paris", "Paris"],
context="Paris is the capital of France."
)
print(result["value"]) # 'PASS' (Score: 0.0)
from spanda.integrations.llamaindex import SpandaRAGGuardrail
guard = SpandaRAGGuardrail()
receipt = guard.validate_response(
samples=["Result A", "Result A", "Result A"],
context_str="Retrieved node knowledge..."
)
print(receipt.is_safe) # True
import litellm
from spanda.integrations.litellm import SpandaLiteLLMGuardrail
litellm.callbacks = [SpandaLiteLLMGuardrail(threshold=0.35, block_mode=False)]
Run the standalone compiled Rust gateway in Docker or Kubernetes:
docker run -d -p 8080:8080 \
-e SPANDA_UPSTREAM=https://api.openai.com/v1 \
-e SPANDA_THRESHOLD=0.35 \
brhmn/spnda-gateway
GET /metrics: Standard Prometheus format for Grafana (spanda_requests_total,spanda_evaluations_total,spanda_mode_collapses_total,spanda_eval_latency_avg_us).GET /healthz: Kubernetes liveness probe.GET /readyz: Kubernetes readiness probe.- Structured JSON logging: Every transaction emits a machine-parseable log line to stdout for Datadog / CloudWatch / Splunk.
Operational Scope: Spanda is engineered for structured reasoning, math, code, agent tool-call arguments, SQL, and canonical factual RAG extraction where 90ms GPU cross-encoders are an unacceptable bottleneck. It is not designed for open-ended, free-form creative prose (e.g., essays or poetry), where synonymous phrasing is naturally diverse and requires heavy neural NLI.
⚠️
| Use Case / Architecture | Recommendation | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Math, Code & Structured QA (7B–70B) | ✅ Recommended | Coherence Scaling Law ensures exact-match matches neural SE at 0 cost. |
| High-Throughput Production APIs | ✅ Recommended | 90,000x latency reduction without GPU requirements. |
| Free-form Paraphrase QA (<7B) | Use Neural SE | Small models produce inconsistent surface phrasing. |
| Ungrounded Facts on Frontier Models (>100B) | ❌ Do Not Use Alone | Subject to Confident Mode Collapse ; must combine with retrieval (RAG). |
Run the test suite:
python3 -m unittest discover tests
If you use Spanda in your research or production systems, please cite:
@article{nayak2026spanda,
title={Spanda: Zero-Cost Lexical Entropy Matches Neural Semantic Uncertainty---Until Frontier Models Break It},
author={Nayak, Bhupen},
journal={arXiv preprint},
year={2026},
doi={10.5281/zenodo.22233648},
url={https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22233648}
}
Spanda adopts a developer-friendly dual-licensing model:
- Python SDK & Integrations (
spanda) : Permissive**MIT License** . Free for all developers, commercial and open-source applications, with zero dependency friction. - Compiled Rust Core Engine & Gateway (
spnda) :Business Source License 1.1 (BSL 1.1) . Free for developers, research, and internal production infrastructure. Prohibits offering Spanda as a competing commercial third-party managed service without an enterprise license from BRHMN Labs Private Limited. Automatically converts to Apache 2.0 on January 1, 2030.