cd /news/developer-tools/show-hn-i-canceled-my-ai-code-review… Β· home β€Ί topics β€Ί developer-tools β€Ί article
[ARTICLE Β· art-101405] src=github.com β†— pub= topic=developer-tools verified=true sentiment=Β· neutral

Show HN: I canceled my AI code reviewer and wrote a free local one

Mukund Zha released Avouch, a free, Git-aware static analysis CLI for Python that reviews only changed files before a commit, using the standard library's ast module and requiring Python 3.10+ and Git. The tool, available via pip install avouch, reports structural problems against configurable limits in avouch.toml and exits with code 0 for clean, 1 for violations, or 2 for errors, without gating commits.

read27 min views1 publishedAug 18, 2026
Show HN: I canceled my AI code reviewer and wrote a free local one
Image: Michielbdejong (auto-discovered)

Review the Python you changed, not the Python you inherited.

Avouch is a lightweight, Git-aware static analysis CLI for Python. It asks Git which files your next commit will touch, parses each changed .py

file with the standard ast

module, and reports structural problems against limits you configure in avouch.toml

.

No daemon. No network. No path lists to maintain. Run it in the seconds before git push

, fix what it flags, push.

pip install avouch
cd your-repo
avouch

Why it existsInstallationQuick startJSON outputQuiet modeGitHub ActionsOther CI systemsConfigurationRulesHow it worksRepository layoutAdding a ruleTestingRoadmapFAQContributingLicense

The review set is the diff, not the repository. Avouch computes the review set from Git at run time (git diff HEAD --name-only

plus untracked files). Every finding is attributable to work you are about to push β€” never to the legacy you inherited.Metrics are exact. Parameter counts, nesting depth, and line spans come from the AST, not regex. If a metric cannot be computed exactly, Avouch does not claim it.Errors are data. An unreadable or syntactically broken file becomes anERROR

entry in the report. One broken file never cancels the review of the others.Avouch reviews; it does not gate. The exit code signals the outcome β€”0

clean,1

violations found,2

Avouch error β€” but enforcement belongs in an opt-in interface, not in a tool you run before every push.The runtime is the standard library. Threegit

subprocess calls andast

/tomllib

. No daemon to keep alive; runtime is bounded by the size of your diff, not your repository.

Requires Python 3.10+ (rules use ast.Match

; configuration uses tomllib

) and Git on PATH.

pip install avouch

or from source:

git clone https://github.com/mukundzha/avouch.git
cd avouch
pip install -e .

Both register the avouch

console script (avouch.cli:main

).

The interface is one command with a small set of optional flags:

cd your-repo
avouch            # human report
avouch --json     # one JSON document on stdout
avouch --docs     # built-in documentation; no review performed
avouch --version  # print the version and exit
avouch --verbose  # step-by-step review details on stderr
avouch --quiet    # analyze, print no report; exit code only
avouch --changed  # compact added/deleted view of changed files vs HEAD
avouch --staged   # review only files staged for the next commit
avouch --all-files  # review every eligible Python file, not just the diff
avouch --not-git  # review every eligible .py file on disk; no Git repo needed
avouch --help     # every flag

The review set is defined by Git, so there is nothing to configure at invocation time. With --not-git

, Avouch skips the Git requirement and reviews every eligible .py

file found by walking the current directory instead (skipping Git, cache, and virtual-environment directories). Avouch reviews:

  • tracked files modified vs. HEAD

(git diff HEAD --name-only

), and - untracked .py

files (git ls-files --others --exclude-standard

).

Deleted paths and non-.py

files are skipped. Committed, untouched files never appear in the output. Files that look generated (generated.py

, *_generated.py

, codegen.py

, autogen.py

, … β€” see src/avouch/utility/is_generated.py

) are skipped too.

The review-scope flags --changed

, --staged

, and --all-files

are mutually exclusive β€” pick at most one. The output flags --json

, --verbose

, and --quiet

combine freely with any review scope.

$ avouch

AVOUCH Β· 2 FILES Β· 4 WARN
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

bad.py:1: SCR002: Bare except detected. Catch a specific exception instead, e.g. except ValueError:.
  β”‚
1 β”‚ def connect(host, port, user, password, db, timeout):
  β”‚     ^^^^^^^ SCR002
2 β”‚     try:
  β”‚

bad.py:1: SCR014: Too many parameters (6/5). Group related parameters into a data class or dictionary.
  β”‚
1 β”‚ def connect(host, port, user, password, db, timeout):
  β”‚     ^^^^^^^ SCR014
2 β”‚     try:
  β”‚

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
BY RULE

  SCR002 Bare except          1
  SCR014 Too many parameters  1

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
PASSED
  βœ“ src/util.py

Headerβ€”AVOUCH Β· N FILES Β· W WARN Β· E ERR

: file and per-severity counts, followed by the per-file findings.Findingsβ€” each finding renders compiler-style: afile:line

header with the rule id and full message, then the offending code region with dimmed line numbers and a caret^^^^^

under the flagged name (rule id in blue on a TTY).BY RULE summaryβ€” findings counted per rule, most common first, with counts aligned on the right. Rendered only when findings exist.** PASSING grid**β€” compliant files, compressed to a few lines with a[+N more]

note when there are many.- Identical (component, rule)

findings are deduplicated per file β€” the header counts every finding, so with overlapping rule IDs (SCR004 / SCR006 duplicate-branch) the row count can be lower than the header count.

$ avouch

All clean.
bash
$ cd /tmp/somewhere-without-git
$ avouch
error: no Git repository found
hint: run Avouch from inside a Git repository, or use --not-git to review files without Git

$ cd ~/fresh-checkout   # e.g. a CI runner
$ avouch
error: nothing to review
hint: nothing changed vs HEAD (CI checkouts are clean); use --all-files for a full review

Colors are ANSI codes emitted only when stdout is a TTY. Piped output is plain, so avouch | tee review.log

and CI capture work cleanly. Runtime errors are written to stderr, so stdout stays clean for piping and --json

capture. The exit code is 0

when the review is clean, 1

when findings are reported, and 2

when Avouch cannot run.

avouch --docs

prints terminal documentation derived from this codebase β€” what Avouch does, the Git-aware workflow, every rule with its scope, every configuration key with its default, both output formats, and realistic examples β€” then exits 0

without running a review. It works anywhere, even outside a Git repository. In a real terminal it opens as an interactive browser (H

elp, G

o, M

ain screen, Q

uit); when stdout is piped it prints the plain text instead.

For automation and CI, --json

prints the review as a single JSON document on stdout, with no human-readable text mixed in:

avouch --json
{
  "version": 1,
  "tool": "avouch",
  "violations": [
    {
      "rule": "SCR014",
      "severity": "WARNING",
      "message": "Too many parameters (6/5). Group related parameters into a data class or dictionary.",
      "file": "buggy.py",
      "name": "extra",
      "kind": "func",
      "line": 4
    }
  ],
  "summary": {
    "total": 1,
    "errors": 0,
    "warnings": 1,
    "files_with_violations": 1
  }
}

Each violation carries the rule id (or a human-readable label when the finding has none), its severity, the message, the file, the component name, its kind (func

, class

, or file

), and the line the finding refers to (null

for file-level findings) β€” the same component and kind shown in the human table. files_with_violations

is the number of distinct files containing at least one violation.

The document is a stable, versioned contract for automation: version

is the schema version (independent of the Avouch package version), tool

identifies the emitter, and the same input always produces the same JSON β€” no colors, timestamps, or diagnostics leak in. Exit codes behave exactly as in normal mode, so avouch --json

can gate CI: parse stdout for the findings and react to the exit status (0

clean, 1

violations, 2

Avouch error).

--quiet

runs the exact same analysis but prints no report; only the exit code signals the outcome (0

clean, 1

violations, 2

Avouch error), which makes it fit hooks and scripts that need only the status. Errors are never silenced: messages such as "error: no Git repository found" still print, --json

still emits its document, and --verbose

diagnostics still go to stderr.

Avouch can run as a GitHub Actions check on every pull request and push.

For an existing project, a minimal workflow installs the published package and reviews the whole checkout on every PR and push:

name: Avouch

on:
  pull_request:
  push:

jobs:
  avouch:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    permissions:
      contents: read

    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v6

      - uses: actions/setup-python@v5
        with:
          python-version: "3.12"

      - name: Install Avouch
        run: python -m pip install avouch

      - name: Run Avouch
        run: avouch --all-files --json

actions/checkout

puts the pull request's code in the runner's working tree β€” Avouch analyzes the files that checkout provided, nothing more.actions/setup-python

provides a Python runtime; Avouch requires Python 3.10+.python -m pip install avouch

installs the latest published release. Pin a version (avouch==0.3.1

) for reproducible runs.avouch --all-files --json

reviews every eligible.py

file and prints the machine-readable document to the job log.permissions: contents: read

is the only permission needed β€” the workflow makes no API calls.

The default review set is files changed vs. Git HEAD

, so a freshly checked-out working tree β€” clean by construction β€” has nothing to review: avouch

would print error: nothing to review

and exit 2

. The same applies to --changed

and --staged

; they only make sense locally, against your own working tree. Whole-repository review is the mode that works in CI:

Command Purpose In CI
avouch
review files changed vs HEAD
empty set; don't use
avouch --changed
diff view of changed files empty set; don't use
avouch --staged
review staged changes empty set; don't use
avouch --all-files
review every eligible Python file the CI mode
avouch --json
machine-readable document on stdout combine with --all-files
avouch --quiet
suppress report; exit code only fine for gating

Avouch's exit code behaves in CI exactly as it does locally: 0

is clean, 1

means findings were reported, 2

means Avouch could not run. GitHub Actions fails a job when a step exits non-zero, so --all-files --json

fails the check on any finding, and the JSON document in the job log shows why. Nothing is hidden with || true

; findings already present in the repository fail the check until they are fixed or excluded with ignore_paths

in avouch.toml

.

The Avouch repository itself ships .github/workflows/avouch.yml

; enable it in the repository's Actions tab and it runs on its own. It installs the repository's own source with pip install -e .

, so it tests the code in the pull request rather than a published release, then reviews the whole checked-out repository with --all-files --json

.

Avouch is a plain console command with a documented exit code, so any CI system can run it with the same three steps:

  • Install: python -m pip install avouch

  • Run: avouch --all-files --json

  • Treat the exit code as the result: 0

pass,1

findings,2

error.

The JSON document on stdout is stable and versioned (see JSON output), so it can be parsed for job annotations, summary comments, or dashboards.

Configuration is optional, partial, and declarative. Avouch looks for a avouch.toml

in the current working directory β€” no upward search, so configuration is repository-local. Any subset of keys is merged over the built-in defaults; a missing or empty file simply means defaults, with no warning.

[limits]        # numeric thresholds per rule
[rules]         # on/off toggle per rule
ignore_paths = ["tests", "migrations"]   # top-level: paths to skip

Name and format:avouch.toml

in your working directory, plain TOML.Scope: the current directory only. Avouch never searches parent directories, so each project configures itself.Missing or empty: defaults are used silently β€” there is no "no configuration found" warning.Environment variables: none. Configuration comes only fromavouch.toml

(theAVOUCH_FONT

variable only selects a terminal font).

List the limit you want under [limits]

; only the keys you name change, everything else stays at its default:

[limits]
max_parameters = 8    # allow up to 8 parameters instead of 5
max_file_lines = 2500 # tolerate larger files

Put the rule under [rules]

and set it to false

:

[rules]
nested_function = false   # stop reporting SCR015

A one-line [rules]

section is a complete, valid configuration.

Key Default Rule
async_without_await
true
SCR001
bare_except
true
SCR002
max_boolean_conditions
true
SCR003
detect_duplicateb
true
SCR004
max_large_comprehensions
true
SCR005
empty_except
true
SCR006
max_if_else_chain
true
SCR007
max_lambda_nodes
true
SCR008
max_local_variables
true
SCR009
max_class_lines
true
SCR010
max_file_lines
true
SCR011
max_function_lines
true
SCR012
max_nesting
true
SCR013
max_parameters
true
SCR014
nested_function
true
SCR015
max_return_statements
true
SCR016
mutable_default_args
true
SCR017
max_complexity
true
function/class complexity

Setting a toggle to false

disables that rule's findings.

Key Default Rule Meaning
max_parameters
5 SCR014 Max positional + keyword params
max_nesting
5 SCR013 Max block nesting depth
max_function_lines
300 SCR012 Max function line span
max_class_lines
200 SCR010 Max class line span
max_file_lines
1000 SCR011 Max file line count
max_complexity
40 β€” Max cyclomatic complexity
max_boolean_conditions
5 SCR003 Max operands in one chain
max_if_chain
5 SCR007 Max if/elif links in a chain
max_local_variables
30 SCR009 Max distinct assigned names
max_return_statements
6 SCR016 Max return s per function
max_lambda_nodes
10 SCR008 Max AST nodes in a lambda body
max_large_comprehensions
40 SCR005 Max AST nodes in a comprehension

Limits are applied by key. A rule whose limit key is absent from the merged config falls back to the limit hardcoded in its own module, so a partial [limits]

never turns a rule off. Every limit key in the table above lives in DEFAULT_LIMITS

and can be tuned from avouch.toml

.

Two mechanisms exclude files, both matching repository-relative paths component-wise β€” tests

skips tests/

and tests/x.py

but not tests.py

; a bare "."

skips the whole repository:

avouch --ignore-path PATH

β€” repeatable CLI flag, orignore_paths = ["tests", "migrations"]

at the top level ofavouch.toml

(must be a list; anything else raises).

CLI and TOML paths are combined and de-duplicated before analysis. Matching is purely string-based (src/avouch/utility/is_ignored.py

) β€” no filesystem access.

Run avouch --verbose

: when there is a review set, the first diagnostics line reports the config source and the active ignore-path count:

avouch: config: avouch.toml, 2 ignore path(s)
avouch: ignore paths: tests, migrations

Without a avouch.toml

the line reads config: defaults (no avouch.toml), 0 ignore path(s)

. avouch --docs

prints the same limits and rule defaults for reference.

  • Malformed TOML (or a non-list ignore_paths

) printserror: invalid avouch.toml configuration: ...

on stderr and exits2

. - Unknown keys are accepted and ignored silently β€” a typo makes the intended setting silently ineffective, and Avouch does not warn ( --verbose

shows only the file name and the ignore-path count). - Limit values are not type-checked: a non-numeric value such as max_parameters = "eight"

is not rejected and fails at analysis time with an internal error (exit2

).

--ignore-path

appends to the TOMLignore_paths

(combined and de-duplicated); there is no CLI override for[limits]

or[rules]

.- Configuration applies equally to every review mode β€” --changed

,--staged

, and--all-files

β€” and to every output mode:--json

,--quiet

, and--verbose

. - Severity is not configurable: rule findings are WARNING

;ERROR

is reserved for files that cannot be read or parsed. --docs

renders the built-in documentation and exits before any configuration is read, so it is unaffected byavouch.toml

.

ignore_paths = ["tests"]

[limits]
max_parameters = 5
max_nesting = 5
max_function_lines = 300
max_class_lines = 200
max_file_lines = 1000
max_complexity = 40
max_boolean_conditions = 5
max_if_chain = 5
max_local_variables = 30
max_return_statements = 6
max_lambda_nodes = 10
max_large_comprehensions = 40

[rules]
max_parameters = true
max_nesting = true
max_function_lines = true
max_class_lines = true
max_file_lines = true
max_complexity = true
max_boolean_conditions = true
max_local_variables = true
max_return_statements = true
max_lambda_nodes = true
max_large_comprehensions = true
mutable_default_args = true

Avouch ships 17 rule identifiers (SCR001–SCR017) plus two cyclomatic complexity checks on functions and classes sharing the max_complexity

limit. Every rule finding is a WARNING

; ERROR

findings exist only for files that cannot be read or parsed. Rules with a threshold render measured/limit

; presence-based rules render detected

.

ID Rule Limit Scope Metric
SCR001 Async without await β€” async funcs detected
SCR002 Bare except β€” funcs detected
SCR003 Boolean expression too complex 5 funcs, classes N/limit
SCR004 Duplicate branch β€” funcs detected
SCR005 Large comprehension 40 funcs N/limit
SCR006 Duplicate branch β€” funcs, classes detected
SCR007 Long if/elif chain 5 funcs, classes N/limit
SCR008 Lambda too complex 10 funcs N/limit
SCR009 Too many local variables 30 funcs N/limit
SCR010 Class too large 200 classes N/limit
SCR011 File too large 1000 files N/limit
SCR012 Function too long 300 funcs N/limit
SCR013 Nesting too deep 5 funcs N/limit
SCR014 Too many parameters 5 funcs N/limit
SCR015 Nested function definition β€” funcs detected
SCR016 Too many return statements 6 funcs N/limit
SCR017 Mutable default argument β€” funcs detected
β€” Function too complex 40 funcs N/limit
β€” Class too complex 40 classes N/limit

Flags async def

functions that never await

. An async function without an await

runs synchronously while still incurring event-loop overhead. This is the only rule applied to async def

functions; the other function rules do not run on them.

async def fetch_config():
    return json.load(open("config.json"))

def fetch_config():
    return json.load(open("config.json"))

Flags except:

handlers that catch every exception β€” including KeyboardInterrupt

and SystemExit

.

try:
    return json.loads(raw)
except:
    return None

try:
    return json.loads(raw)
except (ValueError, TypeError):
    return None

Flags a single and

/or

chain with too many operands. Nested chains sum their operands, so a and (b or c)

scores 3.

if a and b and c and d and e and f:
    launch()

if is_ready(a, b, c) and has_clearance(d, e, f):
    launch()

Flags if

/elif

branches whose bodies are identical β€” a copy-paste or a condition that never varies. The trailing else

body is excluded from the comparison. Two rule IDs cover the same detection: SCR004 (detect_duplicateb

) runs on functions; SCR006 (empty_except

) runs on functions and classes. Both emit the same finding, and the report deduplicates identical rows, so one violation renders once.

if kind == "csv":
    rows = read_csv(path)
elif kind == "json":
    rows = read_csv(path)      # copy-paste

if kind in ("csv", "json"):
    rows = read_csv(path)

Flags list/set/dict comprehensions and generator expressions whose AST node count exceeds max_large_comprehensions

(default 40). Past a few nested clauses a comprehension stops being an expression and becomes a program.

result = [
    [x * 100 for x in row if x != 0]
    for row in matrix
    if row and any(v > limit for v in row)
]

def scale_row(row, factor):
    return [x * factor for x in row if x != 0]

result = [scale_row(row, 100) for row in matrix if row]

Flags if/elif chains longer than max_if_chain

(default 5); the trailing else

clause does not add to the chain length.

if status == "ok":
    ...
elif status == "warn":
    ...
elif status == "error":
    ...
elif status == "fatal":
    ...
elif status == "timeout":
    ...
else:
    ...

status_actions = {"ok": ok_action, "warn": warn_action}
status_actions.get(status, unknown_action)()

Flags lambda

bodies exceeding max_lambda_nodes

(default 10) AST nodes.

transform = lambda v: v.strip().lower().split(",") if "," in v else [v]

def transform(v):
    return v.strip().lower().split(",") if "," in v else [v]

Flags functions assigning more than max_local_variables

(default 30) distinct names β€” every new name is cognitive load and a chance for shadowing. The count covers plain x = ...

assignment targets only (ast.Assign

with ast.Name

targets); augmented and unpacked assignments are not counted. Assignments inside nested functions count toward the enclosing function's total. Fix: extract groups of assignments into helpers.

Flags classes whose line span exceeds max_class_lines

(default 200). A class past ~200 lines is usually several classes; fix by splitting by responsibility.

Flags files exceeding max_file_lines

(default 1000). Fix: split into modules with single concerns.

Flags functions whose line span exceeds max_function_lines

(default 300). Fix: extract helpers β€” process_order

becomes validate

, reserve

, and send

.

Flags maximum nesting depth of block nodes above max_nesting

(default 5). Depth counts if

, for

, while

, async for

, with

, async with

, try

, and match

only. Comprehensions, lambdas, and nested def

s do not add depth; sibling blocks do not stack β€” the metric is maximum depth, not block count.

with open(path) as f:               # 1
    for row in f:                   # 2
        if row.startswith("#"):     # 3
            try:                    # 4
                parse(row)          # 5

def line_ready(row):
    if not row:
        return False
    if row.startswith("#"):
        return False
    return True

with open(path) as f:
    for row in f:
        if line_ready(row):
            parse(row)

Flags functions with more than max_parameters

(default 5) positional or keyword parameters. The count is node.args.args

, so *args

and **kwargs

are excluded; self

on methods counts as a parameter.

def connect(host, port, user, password, db, timeout):
    ...

@dataclass
class Connection:
    host: str
    port: int
    user: str
    password: str
    db: str

def connect(cfg: Connection, timeout: int) -> None: ...

Flags a function defined inside another function. Closures that capture their enclosing scope run once per outer call and defeat unit testing. Only plain def

definitions are flagged; a nested async def

is not.

def process_all(data):
    def normalize(value):
        return value.strip().lower()
    return [normalize(x) for x in data]

def normalize(value):
    return value.strip().lower()

def process_all(data):
    return [normalize(x) for x in data]

Flags functions with more than max_return_statements

(default 6) return

s β€” every exit point is a path to maintain. Returns inside nested functions count toward the enclosing function's total.

Flags default parameter values that are mutable β€” list/dict/set literals ([]

, {}

, {1, 2}

) or mutable constructor calls (list()

, dict()

, set()

, bytearray()

, defaultdict()

, OrderedDict()

). Defaults are evaluated once at definition time, so the same object is shared across every call that omits the argument β€” state leaks between unrelated calls.

def add_item(item, items=[]):
    items.append(item)
    return items

def add_item(item, items=None):
    if items is None:
        items = []
    items.append(item)
    return items

The rule inspects only the function's own defaults β€” a mutable default on a nested function is reported once, by that function's own finding, never duplicated in the enclosing function's report. Immutable defaults (None

, strings, numbers, tuples, frozenset()

) are never flagged.

Flags functions and classes whose McCabe cyclomatic complexity exceeds max_complexity

(default 40). Base 1, then +1 for every if

, for

, async for

, while

, try

, except

handler, match

, ternary, assert

, with

, async with

, and every and

/or

chain β€” an and

/or

chain counts 1 regardless of how many operands it combines, so a and (b or c)

adds 2 (one per chain). The walk covers the whole subtree: a class's complexity is the sum over its entire body, methods included.

The codebase is deliberately small: a CLI orchestrator, four pipeline modules, two config modules, and one rule per file. The governing rule is that ** cli.py only orchestrates** β€” every function it calls lives in another module, and nothing imports

cli.py

.Execution flow β€” this is the full path of a run (--docs

and --version

short-circuit before configuration):

flowchart TD
    M["avouch.cli:main()"] --> P["argparse<br/>--json Β· --quiet Β· --verbose Β· --ignore-path Β·<br/>--changed Β· --staged Β· --all-files Β· --not-git"]
    P --> PD{"--docs?"}
    PD -- "yes" --> D["utility/docs.py<br/>render_docs()"]
    D --> X0["exit 0"]
    PD -- "no" --> C["config/.py<br/>load_config(): avouch.toml merged over defaults"]
    C --> G{"Git repository?"}
    G -- "no Β· without --not-git" --> EX2A["exit 2<br/>error: no Git repository found"]
    G -- "yes, or --not-git" --> S{"Selection mode"}
    S -- "--not-git" --> F4["git.py: get_all_files_on_disk()<br/>*.py walked from CWD"]
    S -- "--all-files" --> F3["git.py: get_all_files()<br/>git ls-files"]
    S -- "--staged" --> F2["git.py: get_staged_files()<br/>git diff --cached --name-only"]
    S -- "default" --> F1["git.py: get_changed_files()<br/>git diff HEAD --name-only + untracked"]
    F1 --> R["git.py: get_reviewable_files()<br/>existing .py Β· not generated Β· not ignored"]
    F2 --> R
    F3 --> R
    F4 --> R
    R -- "none left" --> EX2B["exit 2<br/>error: nothing to review"]
    R -- "files" --> A["analyzer.py: analyze_file()<br/>read file β†’ ast.parse β†’ walk cache β†’ rules"]
    A --> O{"Output mode"}
    O -- "--json" --> J["report.py: render_json()"]
    O -- "--quiet" --> Q["no report"]
    O -- "default + --changed" --> DIF["report.py: render_diff_view()<br/>git diff of the review set"]
    O -- "default" --> H["report.py: generate_report()<br/>terminal report"]
    J --> E{"Any findings?"}
    Q --> E
    DIF --> E
    H --> E
    E -- "no" --> EX0["exit 0"]
    E -- "yes" --> EX1["exit 1"]

Module dependencies β€” what imports what (each arrow is a real import

):

flowchart LR
    CLI["cli.py<br/>orchestration only"] -->|load_config, DEFAULT_RULES| CFG["config/.py"]
    CLI -->|DEFAULT_LIMITS| DEF["config/default.py"]
    CLI -->|review-set computation| GIT["git.py"]
    CLI -->|analyze_file| AN["analyzer.py"]
    CLI -->|render_json Β· render_diff_view<br/>generate_report Β· vlog| REP["report.py"]
    CLI -->|render_docs| DOC["utility/docs.py"]
    CFG --> DEF
    AN --> RULES["rules/*.py<br/>one analyze(node, limits) per rule"]
    AN --> COM["rules/complexity.py<br/>calculate_complexity"]
    RULES -->|walk| WAL["utility/walk.py<br/>cached ast.walk, reset per file"]
    GIT --> IG["utility/is_generated.py"]
    GIT --> II["utility/is_ignored.py"]
    REP -->|get_file_diff| GIT
Module Role Key exports
cli.py
Pipeline wiring main()
docs.py (in utility/ )
Built-in --docs text
DOCS
git.py
Git interaction is_gitrepo , get_changed_files , get_staged_files , get_reviewable_files
analyzer.py
AST analysis read_file , analyze_file
rules/*.py
One rule per module analyze(node, limits)
utility/walk.py
Cached AST traversal walk , reset_walk_cache
report.py
Terminal + JSON rendering render_report , generate_report , render_json
config/default.py
Default limits DEFAULT_LIMITS
config/.py
TOML load + merge load_config , merge_limits , merge_rules , DEFAULT_RULES

cli.main()

loads config (limits

+rules

merged over defaults).git.is_gitrepo()

β€”git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree

; exits the run with a message if not a repo.git.get_changed_files()

β€”git diff HEAD --name-only

plus untracked files;git.get_staged_files()

β€”git diff --cached --name-only

β€” is used with--staged

;get_reviewable_files()

keeps existing.py

paths that are neither generated (is_generated

) nor covered by ignore paths (is_ignored

); if none remain, prints a message and exits2

.- Per file, analyzer.analyze_file(path, limits, rules)

:- reads UTF-8 ( OSError

β†’ERROR

report), parses withast.parse

(SyntaxError

β†’ERROR

report; the rest of the run continues), - resets the walk cache ( utility/walk.py

), then walks the AST, dispatchingFunctionDef

,AsyncFunctionDef

, andClassDef

nodes to their rules (rule toggles are checked before dispatch, so disabled rules never run), - returns (function_reports, file_reports, class_reports)

.

  • reads UTF-8 ( report.render_report(...)

groups issues by file in a single pass and renders theAVOUCH

header, per-file findings, the BY RULE summary, and the[PASSING]

grid.

cli.py

with --docs

short-circuits before config and calls docs.render_docs()

, so no Git or analysis code runs. In a TTY that renders an interactive browser over docs.DOCS

; piped stdout prints the plain text.

Terminal rendering is hand-rolled ANSI in src/avouch/report.py

β€” the rich

dependency declared in pyproject.toml

is not imported. Colors are emitted only when stdout is a TTY; piped output is plain. Each finding renders compiler-style: a file:line

header with rule id and message, the offending code region with dimmed line numbers, and a caret under the flagged name. Identical (component, rule)

findings are deduplicated per file, and the BY RULE summary counts deduplicated findings, sorted most common first. The [PASSING]

grid collapses to at most a few lines, with a [+N more]

note when it overflows. AVOUCH_FONT=name

is an opt-in OSC 50 font switch honored only by capable terminals.

avouch/
β”œβ”€β”€ pyproject.toml          # packaging, console script
β”œβ”€β”€ avouch.toml              # limits this repo lives by
β”œβ”€β”€ src/avouch/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ cli.py              # entry point; orchestration only
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ git.py              # review-set computation
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ analyzer.py         # AST walk, rule dispatch
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ report.py           # terminal report UI
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ rules/              # one module per rule
β”‚   β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ complexity.py           # cyclomatic metric (no issues itself)
β”‚   β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ max_nesting.py          # get_depth + BLOCK_NODES
β”‚   β”‚   └── ...                     # one analyze(node, limits) per rule
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ utility/
β”‚   β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ walk.py         # cached ast.walk + per-file cache reset
β”‚   β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ docs.py         # --docs terminal documentation text
β”‚   β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ is_generated.py # generated-file patterns
β”‚   β”‚   └── is_ignored.py   # ignore-path matching
β”‚   └── config/
β”‚       β”œβ”€β”€ default.py      # DEFAULT_LIMITS
β”‚       └── .py       # load_config, merge_limits, merge_rules
└── tests/
    └── test_git.py         # 74 tests, incl. a real-git end-to-end run

A rule is a module in src/avouch/rules/

exposing analyze(node, limits) -> list[issue]

, where an issue is:

{"rule": "SCR017", "severity": "WARNING",
 "message": "Description (value/limit). Remediation guidance."}

Plus a [rules]

toggle in DEFAULT_RULES

(and a limit in DEFAULT_LIMITS

if the rule has a threshold). Wire the dispatch into analyze_file

with a toggle guard, then write the tests: one for the violation, one for the boundary. The renderer displays any (severity, message)

pair it receives, so no report code changes.

All 74 tests run in a fraction of a second β€” no network, no package installs:

pip install -e .
python -m pytest tests/

Coverage includes the git helpers, config merging, every nesting block type, every complexity decision point, boolean-chain measurement, rule boundaries, analysis failure paths (unreadable/syntax-error files), report output, the --docs

flag (asserted to exit cleanly without touching Git, inside or outside a repository), and an end-to-end run against a real temporary git repository β€” Git itself is not mocked. Mocking is limited to subprocess.run

where a real Git isn't needed.

The detailed implementation plan for the next release lives in roadmap.md β€” v0.3.3 ships eight new capabilities under the theme "first run clean, every run relevant" (

avouch init

, a findings baseline, parallel review, CI-native output formats, rule man pages, a pre-commit hook, and inline diff annotations).Beyond v0.3.3, informed by documented limitations, ordered by the pain they remove:

0.4 β€” Configuration hardening

  • Validate avouch.toml

values with readable errors (today: a malformed file raises) - Search upward from the working directory for avouch.toml

(today: CWD only)

1.0 β€” CI-grade interface

  • Configurable exit codes, so enforcement thresholds can be tuned without changing avouch's review-only default

New rules must survive the philosophy section β€” the ceiling is raised deliberately, not by accretion.

Why only changed files? Pre-existing issues are noise. A whole-repo run buries the few findings you introduced under hundreds you didn't. The review set is the diff, so the output is always relevant to the next push.

Why git diff HEAD and not git diff? Plain

git diff

covers only unstaged changes. HEAD

covers staged plus unstaged β€” the complete set of files about to be pushed β€” and avouch adds untracked files on top, so brand-new files are never missed.Why AST instead of regex? Regex cannot count parentheses across lines, measure nesting, or distinguish a definition from a call. The AST answers structural questions exactly for every valid Python file.

What are the exit codes? Avouch returns 0

when the review is clean, 1

when findings are reported, and 2

when Avouch cannot run. It still reviews rather than gates β€” enforcement stays in whatever calls it β€” but CI can now react to the outcome directly.

Does it need a network or a daemon? No. Three git

subprocess calls and the standard library. Runtime is bounded by the size of your diff, not your repository.

Tests before code. A fix that cannot be expressed as a failing test first is not a fix yet.Keep the diff small. A change that touches more than two modules needs a justification in the PR description.The standard-library runtime is the contract. No new runtime dependencies without a written case that survives the philosophy section.The README is the spec. If the behavior changed, the README changes in the same commit.

Setup:

git clone https://github.com/mukundzha/avouch.git
cd avouch
pip install -e .
python -m pytest tests/

MIT β€” see LICENSE

.

── more in #developer-tools 4 stories Β· sorted by recency
── more on @mukund zha 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain β€” perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
β†’ Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host βœ“
Get free account β†’ Pricing
from €0/mo Β· no card required
LIVE [news/show-hn-i-canceled-m…] indexed:0 read:27min 2026-08-18 Β· β€”