Hey HN, I built GlossaryPage after noticing companies have long-tail content opportunities that never get created because they fall between blog posts and documentation.
The primary use case is marketing teams building glossaries and learning hubs around these topics. The same workflow also works for support teams creating help centers.
GlossaryPage helps teams identify unanswered topics, generate drafts with AI, review content, and publish structured knowledge pages.
Here is a demo site: https://glossary.glossarypage.com Some things I have been thinking about while building this:
- How to avoid creating more low-quality content?
This is a challenge for anyone building AI content tools, and is something I'm working on. The product is focused on generating drafts, but users are responsible for reviewing and approving what gets published. My guess is that as AI systems improve at evaluating quality, there will be less value in publishing low-quality content.
- Why not just use an existing CMS or build this internally?
Both are possible, and you can quickly generate a similar site. GlossaryPage focuses on the content workflow, and I'm exploring features like quality checks and integrations with other tools.
The product is still early, and I'm exploring which features to prioritize next. What would make this valuable enough to use instead of building something similar yourself?
Comments URL: [https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49031008](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49031008)
Points: 1