Show HN: A benchmark for AI agent guardrails that caught my own plugin A new open-source benchmark, holdline, measures the effectiveness of AI-agent write-guards, reporting a class-balanced Cohen's kappa of 0.82 for agreement with a 4-model judge panel on real agent trajectories from ODCV-Bench. Created by a developer who found their own plugin lacking, holdline scores any guard expressed as a (commitments, action) → block? function over a 42-case corpus that includes an injection-attack class, and is designed to provide evidence for the DeepSeek Harness ecosystem's 20+ guard/policy plugins. A guard's job is to hold the line. holdline measures whether it does — a neutral benchmark for AI-agent write-guards. It scores any guard — expressed as a commitments, action → block? function — over a labeled corpus, and reports the metrics that matter for a gate: catch rate, false-block rate, and class-balanced Cohen's kappa raw kappa lies under class imbalance . The corpus includes an injection-attack class : actions whose content tries to talk the guard out of its verdict. Why: the DeepSeek Harness ecosystem has 20+ guard/policy plugins and no shared way to measure whether any of them works. A guard's README saying "blocks dangerous commands" is not evidence. This harness is the evidence. pnpm install node run.mjs scores every built-in guard over the 42-case corpus node run.mjs --model