Should AI crawlers access your site? A technical guide explains that OpenAI, Anthropic and Perplexity each operate multiple crawler user agents with distinct purposes, and that robots.txt rules can be set independently per agent. Training crawlers such as GPTBot and ClaudeBot feed future models, while search crawlers like OAI-SearchBot, Claude-SearchBot and PerplexityBot feed live retrieval, so blocking the latter can remove a site from AI answer results. The guide recommends allowing search crawlers while treating training-crawler access as a separate business decision, and warns that firewall or CDN blocks can override robots.txt. Many sites added Disallow: / for GPTBot in 2023 and never looked at it again. Some went further and blocked every AI user agent they could find. That is a legitimate choice. But it is often made without knowing that the crawlers do different jobs. Block the training bot and you keep your content out of training. Block the search bot and you may vanish from AI answers. This guide separates the two so you can decide on purpose. OpenAI, Anthropic and Perplexity each run more than one user agent. Their own documentation splits them by purpose, and each is controlled separately in robots.txt. Per OpenAI's crawler documentation, there are these robots: OpenAI states that each setting is independent. You can allow OAI-SearchBot and disallow GPTBot. It also says robots.txt changes can take about 24 hours to take effect for search. Anthropic's help center lists three: Anthropic says its bots honor robots.txt and support the non-standard Crawl-delay directive. It also warns that blocking by IP address may not work reliably, because it stops Anthropic reading your robots.txt. Perplexity's documentation lists two: Here is the useful way to think about it. Training crawlers GPTBot, ClaudeBot feed future models. Blocking them is about control over how your content is used. It has no documented effect on whether you appear in live search answers. Search crawlers OAI-SearchBot, Claude-SearchBot, PerplexityBot feed the retrieval side. Blocking them takes you out of the pool of sources those products can surface and link. User-triggered fetchers ChatGPT-User, Claude-User, Perplexity-User act on behalf of one person asking one question. Some vendors say robots.txt may not apply to them. If your goal is to be recommended by AI assistants, allow the search crawlers. Whether to allow the training crawlers is a separate business call. Ask three questions. 1. Do we want AI assistants to recommend us? For most businesses selling something, yes. Allow the search bots. 2. Is our content the product? Publishers, paid research firms and licensed-content sites may reasonably block training bots. Their content is the thing they sell. 3. Are we comfortable with training use? For a software company with public marketing pages, many teams decide the upside of being known to models outweighs the cost. Others disagree. Both are defensible. Note that blocking training bots only affects future crawling, not data already collected. There is no universal right answer. There is only an answer you chose knowingly. Each group starts with a User-agent line. Rules apply to the agent named in that group. User-agent: GPTBot Allow: / User-agent: OAI-SearchBot Allow: / User-agent: ChatGPT-User Allow: / User-agent: ClaudeBot Allow: / User-agent: Claude-SearchBot Allow: / User-agent: Claude-User Allow: / User-agent: PerplexityBot Allow: / User-agent: Perplexity-User Allow: / If you have no rule blocking these agents, they are generally allowed by default. Listing them is optional but makes intent explicit. User-agent: GPTBot Disallow: / User-agent: ClaudeBot Disallow: / User-agent: OAI-SearchBot Allow: / User-agent: Claude-SearchBot Allow: / User-agent: PerplexityBot Allow: / This matches each vendor's own description: training bots blocked, search bots allowed. Be aware that it is your reading of their documentation. Vendors can change their bots, so recheck now and then. User-agent: GPTBot User-agent: ClaudeBot User-agent: PerplexityBot Disallow: /account/ Disallow: /internal/ Stacking several User-agent lines above one set of rules is valid. Most sites should do this rather than block everything. A blanket User-agent: block. This blocks every bot without a more specific group, including all the search crawlers above. Check any wildcard rules. Blocking at the firewall. A CDN or WAF bot rule can return 403 to crawlers that robots.txt allows. Perplexity and OpenAI both publish IP ranges so you can allowlist them. Anthropic asks that you do not rely on IP blocking to opt out. Typos in user-agent names. The names are GPTBot , OAI-SearchBot , ChatGPT-User , ClaudeBot , Claude-SearchBot , Claude-User , PerplexityBot and Perplexity-User . A misspelled name matches nothing and fails silently. Assuming robots.txt stops everything. It is a request, not a lock. Vendors say their bots honor it, and some user-triggered fetchers may not. If content must be private, put it behind a login. Forgetting subdomains. Robots.txt applies per host. Anthropic notes you should do this for every subdomain. Do not trust a file you have not tested. The AI crawler access checker https://pineprompt.com/tools/ai-crawler-access-checker reads your robots.txt and shows which AI user agents are allowed or blocked. Run it after every change, and again after any CDN or firewall update. Then check your server logs for the user-agent names above. If you allowed them and never see them, something between the internet and your server is in the way. Robots.txt says what bots may fetch. llms.txt is a proposed plain-text file that points language models to your most useful pages. Treat it as a low-cost extra, not a guaranteed fix. If you want one, the llms.txt generator https://pineprompt.com/tools/llms-txt-generator builds a starting file from your site. Changing robots.txt is an input. What you care about is the output: do AI assistants name and cite you? After you settle your rules, track it. Pineprompt runs your prompts across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, Grok and Copilot, and reports where you appear and which sources are cited. Plans start at $99 a month with every engine included. See the pricing page https://pineprompt.com/pricing . Originally published on pineprompt.com https://pineprompt.com/blog/should-you-let-gptbot-claudebot-and-perplexitybot-crawl-your-site .