Send the arXiv AI-generated slop, get a yearlong vacation from submissions

The arXiv preprint server will ban authors for one year and permanently require peer review for future submissions if they submit AI-generated content that violates scholarly communication standards. Thomas Dietterich, an arXiv editorial advisory council member and moderator, announced the policy in a social media thread, stating it stems from existing moderation rules requiring careful preparation of submissions. The move aims to curb the influx of fake citations, unedited AI responses, and nonsensical diagrams that have increasingly appeared in scientific literature.

AI-generated slop has shown up everywhere, including in the peer-reviewed literature. Fake citations, unedited prompt responses, and nonsensical diagrams https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/02/scientists-aghast-at-bizarre-ai-rat-with-huge-genitals-in-peer-reviewed-article/ have all slipped past editors and peer reviewers, and it’s not always clear if there are any consequences for the people responsible. Now, it appears that a number of scientific fields will be enforcing rules against AI-generated problems even before peer review or journals get involved. One of the people involved in the physics and astronomy preprint server arXiv used a social media thread to announce that any inappropriate AI-produced content submitted to the server will result in a one-year ban and a permanent requirement that future publications undergo peer review before the arXiv will host them. Thomas Dietterich, in addition to being an emeritus professor at Oregon State University, is heavily involved with arXiv, serving on its editorial advisory council https://info.arxiv.org/about/people/editorial advisory council.html section-editorial-committees and on its moderation team https://arxiv.org/moderators/ . So he’s in a good position to understand the organization’s policies, although we have also reached out to arXiv leadership for confirmation, but have not yet received a response. In a thread on X https://x.com/tdietterich/status/2055000956144935055 also screenshotted on Bluesky https://bsky.app/profile/aniloza.bsky.social/post/3mltoq2cnhc2u , for those without X accounts , Dietterich described the new policy as arising directly from the arXiv’s moderation standards https://info.arxiv.org/help/moderation/index.html . “Submissions to arXiv must comply with appropriate standards of scholarly communication in form, including appropriate and carefully prepared sections, figures, tables, references, etc.,” those standards read. “General scrupulousness and care of preparation are required.”