cd /news/large-language-models/sanitfy-check-my-qwen3-8-5090-result… · home topics large-language-models article
[ARTICLE · art-107989] src=forum.level1techs.com ↗ pub= topic=large-language-models verified=true sentiment=· neutral

Sanitfy check my Qwen3.8 5090 Results; new to Local AI

A user running Qwen3.8-27B on an NVIDIA RTX 5090 32 GB with LM Studio reports decode speeds ranging from 12.38 to 47.4 tok/s depending on quantization and multi-token prediction settings, with the Q4_K_M quant achieving the fastest speed at ~47.4 tok/s and ~22.9 GB VRAM usage. The user, who works in AI adoption, governance, and cybersecurity, is building a 20-40b MCP server for red/blue teaming with Kali and seeks feedback on whether their setup and results are optimal.

read2 min views1 publishedAug 23, 2026

Hey Everyone! First post, kinda shy, be gentle

So - I don’t have a TON of experience in Local AI - I do work in the AI Adoption / Governance / Cybersecurity Space, and am lucky enough to have active subscriptions across every major frontier model - however, I haven’t messed with Local AI in about 8 months. But - I’ve been hearing a ton about Qwen3.8-27b, so I loaded it up on my rig at the house in LM Studio, and ran a few tests with a harness doing some pentesting on a dev vm, and was pretty happy with the initial results, though it did get stuck in a few loops which ate through my context. So - I’m now in the process of building a 20-40b focused MCP server specifically for red teaming / blue teaming with Kali.

Before I get too deep in that process (I’m around 15ish hours in so far) - I want to get some opinions on if my initial testing is “Stupid” or “The old way”.

This is my current setup:

HW Spec
CPU Intel Core i9-13900K
GPU NVIDIA RTX 5090 32 GB
RAM 64 GB 7200 MT/s DDR5
OS Windows

I’m using LM Studio right now - which I’m sure isn’t great - but this is the only thing I’ve used for tasks like these - open to suggestions if this is the wrong setup.

Below is the performance I have been getting - this is another area I want a sanity check on. Before that, a bit of context for my decisions - this test was scoped specifically for a phased, agentic red team assessment on a single device. Below are my results:

| Model / GGUF | Quant | MTP Max | Decode | Prompt Eval | Approx. VRAM | Relative Speed |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
`chimingw/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-OrcaRouter-GGUF` |

Q6_K | 2 | 12.38 tok/s | 1,016.55 tok/s | ~28 GB | 1.00× | JonathanColetti/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-GGUF | Q6_K | 1 | ~22.3 tok/s | — | ~27.5–28.5 GB | 1.80× | JonathanColetti/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-GGUF | Q6_K | 2 | 31.60 tok/s | ~1,844.91 tok/s | ~27.5–28.5 GB | 2.55× | JonathanColetti/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-GGUF | Q5_K_M | 2 | ~44.7 tok/s | ~2,045.19 tok/s | ~26.3–26.5 GB | 3.61× | JonathanColetti/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-GGUF | Q4_K_M | 2 | ~47.4 tok/s | ~2,267.78 tok/s | ~22.9 GB | 3.83× |

So - open ended question; give me your feedback. Should I switch away from LM Studio? Are my speeds decent? Am I leaving some performance on the table?

── more in #large-language-models 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @qwen3.8-27b 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/sanitfy-check-my-qwe…] indexed:0 read:2min 2026-08-23 ·