{"slug": "sanctuary-policies-are-keeping-prisoners-in-local-jails-away-from-ice", "title": "Sanctuary policies are keeping prisoners in local jails away from ICE", "summary": "A Stateline analysis of ICE data from Jan. 20, 2025, to March 10, 2026, found that states with strict non-cooperation policies—Oregon, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, and Washington—have the lowest rates of immigration arrests in local jails, while states limiting sanctuary policies, such as Wyoming, West Virginia, Mississippi, and Alabama, have the highest. The analysis also showed that cooperative states like Florida did not see reduced street arrests, with Florida ranking 40th in street arrests, similar to Washington state.", "body_md": "**Getting your**\n\n[Trinity Audio](//trinityaudio.ai)player ready...**By Tim Henderson, Stateline.org**\n\nAs more states seek ways to limit immigration enforcement, a Stateline analysis shows one tactic has had an effect: making it more difficult for local law enforcement to hand over people they are holding in city or county jails to federal immigration authorities.\n\nThe analysis found that states with strict non-cooperation policies — Oregon, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York and Washington state — have the lowest rates of immigration arrests in jails.\n\nThe highest rates were generally in states that limit or bar so-called sanctuary policies. Those states include Wyoming, West Virginia, Mississippi and Alabama.\n\nNew Mexico, a border state, also was one of the five states with the highest local jail arrest rate despite having some statewide policies limiting cooperation. The state ethics commission [sued](https://sourcenm.com/2026/07/10/new-mexico-state-ethics-commission-sues-state-corrections-secretary-over-probation-ice-referrals/) the state corrections department in July charging violations of a state law banning most cooperation.\n\nHowever, early threats from the Trump administration to target sanctuary states for more street arrests had uneven results through March 10, the latest data released by Immigration and Customs Enforcement and obtained by the California-based [Deportation Data Project](https://deportationdata.org/index.html). The analysis includes arrests since Jan. 20, 2025, the first day of the second Trump administration.\n\nPresident Donald Trump announced March 5 he would replace high-profile Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and that Markwayne Mullin would take over March 31. Mullin has pledged a more low-key approach to ramping up immigration enforcement.\n\nStateline’s analysis doesn’t reflect a new wave of arrests starting in June that has pushed arrests to new highs, or new airport arrests in recent months cracking down on people with expired visas. But the data does show an administration struggling to get arrest numbers up everywhere, said Jacob Kang-Brown, a criminologist who did a similar [analysis](https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/jails_immigration.html) in October for the Prison Policy Initiative, a Massachusetts-based think tank that seeks to reduce incarceration.\n\nLast year border czar Tom Homan said he would “flood the zone” with extra street enforcement in sanctuary cities. States without sanctuary policies, such as Florida, would be treated differently, he said. “We don’t have that problem in Florida, where every sheriff is working with us,” Homan said.\n\nBut Kang-Brown said cooperative states did not get a break from street operations and raids.\n\n“They don’t stop doing stuff in the community just because they can get in the jails. It was very widespread arrests around the country, even in states that collaborated enthusiastically and were pushing ICE for even more enforcement, like Florida.” Kang-Brown said.\n\nIn the Stateline analysis, Florida’s rate of street arrests ranked 40th, about the same as Washington state, which has [restrictions](https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=10.93.160) on immigration arrests at jails, and higher than Connecticut, which has similar restrictions. Connecticut Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont [rejects](https://portal.ct.gov/governor/news/press-releases/2025/08-2025/governor-lamont-statement-on-letter-from-the-department-of-justice?language=en_US) the sanctuary label, calling the restrictions “clear rules for cooperation with federal immigration authorities.”\n\nSome states with policies restricting jail transfers to ICE did see high rates of street arrests last winter amid attacks on what the administration often calls “sanctuary politicians” in those states. [Maine](https://www.dhs.gov/news/2026/01/21/ice-launches-operation-catch-day-targeting-worst-worst-criminal-illegal-aliens), [Minnesota](https://www.dhs.gov/news/2026/02/04/dhs-reaches-more-4000-arrests-illegal-aliens-including-murderers-sex-offenders-gang) and the [District of Columbia](https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/03/making-the-district-of-columbia-safe-and-beautiful/) were among the 10 states with the highest rates of street arrests as a share of noncitizens, and many of those arrested did not have criminal records.\n\nOperation Metro Surge, concentrated in Minnesota’s Minneapolis-St. Paul over the winter, ended in two killings by federal agents and hundreds of millions of dollars in business losses.\n\nBut cooperative states also saw high rates of street arrests: Seven of the 10 states with the highest rates of street arrests as a share of noncitizens were ones with cooperative policies. The very highest was West Virginia, where there were only 17,100 noncitizens counted in 2024 but hundreds were arrested in a single “surge team” [operation](https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/ice-arrests-650-illegal-aliens-west-virginia) in January.\n\nAfter criticism from the Trump administration, some states have backed off some of the more far-reaching sanctuary policies, but others have been emboldened by the unpopularity of Trump’s mass deportation agenda.\n\nStateline’s analysis underscores the fact that local jails, and how they handle ICE detainer requests to hold inmates for immigration arrests, are a powerful tool.\n\nICE often criticizes cities and states with sanctuary policies for releasing violent criminals, but only a small fraction of arrestees are violent criminals and a large number have only immigration violations.\n\n“Generally if someone poses a real threat to safety, public safety or national security, that detainer is generally respected,” said Colleen Putzel-Kavanaugh, an associate policy analyst for the Migration Policy Institute, a Washington, D.C., think tank specializing in immigration research.\n\nBut, she added, “if someone got a ding on a speeding ticket and otherwise has a clean record, then there are some places that are not going to hand that person over or hold that person for ICE.”\n\nICE made a record 51,000 arrests in July but hasn’t released detailed information by state since March.\n\nFor all ICE arrests combined, the highest rates were in Wyoming, West Virginia, Mississippi, Alabama and New Mexico, all having more than 300 arrests per 10,000 noncitizens through March.\n\nThe street arrests pulled in more people without criminal records — 81% of the Washington, D.C., street arrests were for immigration-related offenses only and the share was about two-thirds or more in 14 other states with statewide sanctuary policies.\n\nSome states have tried to strike a balance, allowing jail transfers to ICE for a list of crimes, including charged crimes as well as convictions, and for court orders of removal, which can be issued for some immigration offenses.\n\nIn [New Jersey](https://newjerseymonitor.com/2026/03/09/how-a-nj-bill-to-protect-migrants-has-morphed-since-ex-governors-veto/), the state legislature backed off some proposed changes that would have made it harder for ICE to make arrests in local jails. The law as signed in March maintained controversial exceptions for immigrants with removal orders and for immigrants facing charges and well as convictions among a list of serious crimes.\n\nPassage of the law came after the Trump administration in March highlighted the case of a New Jersey man charged with sex crimes against a child younger than 15 years old, calling it a “New Jersey nightmare” and claiming the man might have qualified for release under state policies at the time, despite a detainer request. Court records indicate the man was never released and remains in an Ocean County jail after pleading guilty pending sentencing in September.\n\nIn some states, including [Maryland](https://marylandmatters.org/2026/07/10/trump-administration-sues-the-state-over-passage-of-the-community-trust-act/), the Trump administration and local sheriffs have challenged policies against extending local jail time or responding to immigration detainers. Courts have ruled that such detainers are voluntary requests that states and cities may turn down legally, and there are preliminary injunctions in [California](https://mainemorningstar.com/2025/08/29/cities-respond-to-trumps-sanctuary-threats-as-judge-extends-protection-from-threatened-cuts/) and [Washington state](https://stateline.org/2025/07/14/more-cities-counties-join-lawsuit-seeking-to-block-new-conditions-on-federal-funding/) against withholding some or all federal funding because of it. Those injunctions are under appeal.\n\nA similar lawsuit by the administration against New Jersey cities was [dismissed](https://newjerseymonitor.com/2026/06/24/judge-trump-challenge-sanctuary-policies-immigrants/) in June.\n\nThat hasn’t stopped the Trump administration from hectoring state and municipalities it sees as overly lax on detainer policies.\n\n“Sanctuary policies continue to disregard U.S. immigration law and put communities at risk by releasing illegal aliens prone to criminal activity into our communities,” said Robert Guadian, the Washington, D.C., field office director for ICE’s enforcement and removals office, in an Aug. 6 statement. Guadian [complained](https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/ice-arrests-2-criminal-illegal-aliens-prince-georges-county-detention-center-after) that two young men had been released from a Maryland jail in Prince George’s County after criminal charges were dismissed. They were later arrested by ICE in separate traffic stops.\n\nDelaware’s legislature in June approved a [bill](https://legis.delaware.gov/BillDetail/143280), now awaiting Democratic Gov. Matt Meyer’s signature, with exceptions only for certain crime convictions.\n\nEven as the Trump administration has been frustrated by legal attempts to force more compliance with detainers, it’s been more successful with encouraging participation in the 287(g) program that allows local officers to investigate immigration themselves and help turn prisoners over to ICE. The [programs](https://www.ice.gov/identify-and-arrest/287g) are in 39 states, but are heavily concentrated in Texas and Florida.\n\n“ICE is actually paying the salaries of some local sheriffs or law enforcement, and that’s a huge savings for their jurisdictions,” said Putzel-Kavanaugh, of the Migration Policy Institute. “For a local town or sheriff that could be huge.”\n\nThe tension between federal immigration authorities and local jail authorities has been around for decades, noted Graber, of the Immigrant Legal Resource Center. Local and state authorities have the best possible awareness of local crime, she noted, and fingerprints from their arrest get transmitted automatically to immigration authorities to choose candidates for arrest and deportation.\n\n“ICE has been pursuing the local law enforcement’s broad reach into communities and their ability to surveil the public at a much greater level for a long time,” Graber said. “That’s why they want instant information about every person who’s arrested.”\n\n*Stateline reporter Tim Henderson can be reached at* *thenderson@stateline.org**.*\n\n*©2026 States Newsroom. Visit at stateline.org. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.*", "url": "https://wpnews.pro/news/sanctuary-policies-are-keeping-prisoners-in-local-jails-away-from-ice", "canonical_source": "https://www.ocregister.com/2026/08/31/sanctuary-policies-local-jails-ice/", "published_at": "2026-08-31 16:40:41+00:00", "updated_at": "2026-08-31 16:53:33.735193+00:00", "lang": "en", "topics": ["ai-policy"], "entities": ["Stateline", "Immigration and Customs Enforcement", "Deportation Data Project", "Donald Trump", "Kristi Noem", "Markwayne Mullin", "Jacob Kang-Brown", "Prison Policy Initiative"], "alternates": {"html": "https://wpnews.pro/news/sanctuary-policies-are-keeping-prisoners-in-local-jails-away-from-ice", "markdown": "https://wpnews.pro/news/sanctuary-policies-are-keeping-prisoners-in-local-jails-away-from-ice.md", "text": "https://wpnews.pro/news/sanctuary-policies-are-keeping-prisoners-in-local-jails-away-from-ice.txt", "jsonld": "https://wpnews.pro/news/sanctuary-policies-are-keeping-prisoners-in-local-jails-away-from-ice.jsonld"}}