{"slug": "routerpark-status-flipped-to-degraded", "title": "RouterPark status flipped to degraded", "summary": "RouterPark's status has flipped to degraded, according to the monitoring site's own dashboard for unofficial and free AI model relays. RouterPark catalogues third-party Claude and GPT proxies and offers its own any.routerpark.com entry point, which advertises a $20 signup credit but probes report roughly $2, with quota depending on the third-party relays it lists. Uprouter rates RouterPark as high risk, citing aggregated community-run proxies without formal SLAs, opaque sourcing of claude-opus-4-x models, and data privacy exposure for user code and business data.", "body_md": "# > RouterPark\n\n[routerpark.com](https://routerpark.com)\n\nRouterPark is a directory and monitoring site for unofficial and free AI model relays. It catalogues third-party Claude and GPT proxies, providing a dashboard for status and latency while offering its own unified entry point for multiple 'free' upstreams.\n\n### // pros\n\n- Directory plus live monitoring dashboard, centralizing many free relays' status and latency to find working nodes\n- Login-free, no payment, low barrier to try\n- Supports Claude/ChatGPT/Codex, OpenAI/Anthropic-compatible\n\n### // cons\n\n- Essentially a directory/monitor whose usability depends entirely on the third-party free relays it lists; stability is uncontrollable\n- Its own proxy exposes high-end claude-opus-4-x models with opaque sourcing—risk of stolen upstream keys / model downgrade\n- The aggregated free relays are mostly anonymous individuals without corporate credentials and may wipe and vanish anytime\n- User code/business data is sent out via third-party relays, high privacy risk\n\nUsable as a directory/monitoring reference to discover free relay nodes, but never for sensitive code or production; behind it are anonymous third-party relays that can fail or abscond anytime—fall back to official channels for anything important.\n\n## community_reputation\n\nRouterPark has an author self-recommendation on V2EX and a clear positioning (free-relay directory + monitoring), but the community is broadly wary of the third-party free relays it aggregates, citing poor control, data exfiltration and sudden runaways.\n\nimported analysis — independent third party, not Uprouter editorial · verify before relying on it\n\nHow we estimated this: the free allowance is converted to a dollar value using the provider’s own pay-as-you-go rates for the models a typical developer would reach for. When the allowance is metered in requests, tokens or minutes rather than dollars, we assume median usage of the cheapest capable model. Because assumptions are involved, the figure carries the est. flag — treat it as an order of magnitude, not a quote.\n\nnote: Directory is free/login-free; any.routerpark.com proxy (ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL) signup credit: site advertises $20 but probes report ~$2 (+~$10 for posting). Conservative: $2; quota depends on third-party relays.\n\n| Plan | Type | Monthly | Input /1M | Output /1M | Note | \n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| Free tier (source-reported) | free | — | — | — | The directory itself is free and login-free; its own any.routerpark.com proxy claims a $2 signup credit and can be used directly as ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL, but quota and sourcing depend on the third-party relays it lists. | \n| Community Free | free | — | — | — | Access to aggregated free relays without signup. | \n\n[official pricing page](https://routerpark.com)\n\nPricing normalized from public sources — always verify with the provider.\n\n### // model prices\n\n| Model | Input /1M | Output /1M | Context | \n|---|---|---|---|\n| [claude-opus-4-6](https://www.uprouter.online/models/claude-opus-4-6) | — | — | 1M | \n| [claude-opus-4-7](https://www.uprouter.online/models/claude-opus-4-7) | — | — | 1M | \n| [claude-opus-4-8](https://www.uprouter.online/models/claude-opus-4-8) | — | — | 1M | \n\n## $ Does RouterPark have a free tier?\n\nYes — RouterPark offers a free tier that we value at roughly $2.00 in free credits (estimate — derived from rate-limited usage at pay-as-you-go prices). Always confirm current limits on RouterPark's official pricing page — free tiers change without notice.\n\n## $ How much does RouterPark cost per 1M tokens?\n\nRouterPark does not publish simple per-1M-token pricing (it may bill per request, per output, or via a subscription plan). Check their official pricing page for exact figures.\n\n## $ Is RouterPark safe to use?\n\nUprouter rates RouterPark as high risk. Aggregates unofficial relays and community-run proxies which lack formal SLAs and may pose data privacy risks. The 'free' models are often forwarded from third-party sources without explicit permission from the original model providers. Risk ratings are editorial, evidence-based, and never influenced by affiliate relationships.\n\nRaw community sentiment, shown unblended. Votes never feed into objective data fields like price, risk, or status — and never into sort order.\n\nNo published reviews yet — be the first.\n\n## // more_informationprice history · live status · risk & confidence · code snippets\n\n### price_history\n\nNo recorded changes yet.\n\n### live_status\n\n[full history →](https://www.uprouter.online/s/routerpark-com/uptime)\n\n[7/30-day charts →](https://www.uprouter.online/s/routerpark-com/uptime)\n\nbest-effort probes · not a guarantee · last 56m ago\n\n| Checked | Status | Latency | \n|---|---|---|\n| 56m ago | degraded | 199ms | \n| 1d ago | up | 269ms | \n| 2d ago | up | 207ms | \n| 2d ago | up | 304ms | \n| 3d ago | up | 225ms | \n| 4d ago | up | 321ms | \n| 5d ago | up | 268ms | \n| 6d ago | up | 255ms | \n| 6d ago | up | 176ms | \n| 7d ago | up | 276ms | \n| 8d ago | up | 251ms | \n| 9d ago | up | 197ms | \n| 10d ago | up | 228ms | \n| 10d ago | up | 532ms | \n| 11d ago | up | 281ms | \n| 12d ago | up | 360ms | \n| 13d ago | up | 279ms | \n| 14d ago | up | 177ms | \n| 14d ago | up | 316ms | \n| 15d ago | up | 242ms | \n| 16d ago | up | 199ms | \n| 17d ago | up | 214ms | \n| 17d ago | up | 288ms | \n| 18d ago | up | 280ms | \n| 19d ago | up | 305ms | \n| 20d ago | up | 196ms | \n| 21d ago | up | 312ms | \n| 21d ago | up | 269ms | \n| 22d ago | up | 362ms | \n| 23d ago | up | 280ms | \n\nUprouter runs its own probes; best-effort, not a guarantee. Probe results depend on our network location and cadence — for production, always use the provider’s own status page.\n\n### risk_&_confidence\n\nAggregates unofficial relays and community-run proxies which lack formal SLAs and may pose data privacy risks. The 'free' models are often forwarded from third-party sources without explicit permission from the original model providers.\n\nConfidence reflects how much verifiable evidence (official docs, probe history, community reports) backs this entry. Risk is our editorial assessment of operator reliability and terms — not financial advice.\n\n### code_snippets\n\n```\n# RouterPark's own API — get a key from their dashboard\ncurl https://YOUR-PROVIDER-ENDPOINT/chat/completions \\\n  -H \"Authorization: Bearer THEIR_API_KEY\" \\\n  -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n  -d '{\n    \"model\": \"claude-opus-4-6\",\n    \"messages\": [{ \"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"Hello\" }]\n  }'\n```\n\nDirect to the provider — Uprouter receives nothing; verify their current pricing before purchasing.\n\n[Hvoy.aifree $1.49 est.pricing n/aLow risk](https://www.uprouter.online/s/hvoy-ai)\n\n[All API Hubfree tier (n/q)pricing n/aLow risk](https://www.uprouter.online/s/all-api-hub-qixing1217-top)\n\n[HvoyAIfree tier (n/q)pricing n/aLow risk](https://www.uprouter.online/s/hvoyai-com)\n\n[Modelocfree tier (n/q)pricing n/aHigh risk](https://www.uprouter.online/s/modeloc-com)\n\nRanked by neutral similarity signals only — live status, free-tier shape and free-credit proximity. Commercial relationships never influence this list.", "url": "https://wpnews.pro/news/routerpark-status-flipped-to-degraded", "canonical_source": "https://www.uprouter.online/s/routerpark-com", "published_at": "2026-10-10 00:00:43+00:00", "updated_at": "2026-10-10 00:57:23.311302+00:00", "lang": "en", "topics": ["ai-products", "ai-tools", "ai-infrastructure", "large-language-models"], "entities": ["RouterPark", "Claude", "ChatGPT", "Codex", "OpenAI", "Anthropic", "Uprouter", "V2EX"], "also_reported_by": [], "alternates": {"html": "https://wpnews.pro/news/routerpark-status-flipped-to-degraded", "markdown": "https://wpnews.pro/news/routerpark-status-flipped-to-degraded.md", "text": "https://wpnews.pro/news/routerpark-status-flipped-to-degraded.txt", "jsonld": "https://wpnews.pro/news/routerpark-status-flipped-to-degraded.jsonld"}}